Nomina
MCPB · NOMINA.MCPB · 2 COMPONENTS
Read-only markets research from public data: on-chain prices, Treasury yields, macro, SEC filings.
Available components
Last scanned (6 hours ago)
Scores higher than 87% of MCPB servers
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security12
- No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
- Known CVEs were checked across the 31 of 31 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree.Partial
- Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
- 1 of 31 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 0 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 891 tokens (~148/item across 6 items; 5 tools + 1 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management60
- Stability observed for 18 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage83
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 42% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 16 Oct 26 +1
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Stability: 0.53 → unverified ▼ security
- Schema quality: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Package version: 2.0.6 → 2.0.7 functional
- 15 Oct 26 +37
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Schema quality: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.53 ▲ functional
- 7 Oct 26 −30
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Stability: Stability not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to compare. security
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- Schema quality: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- 29 Sept 26 +30
- Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
- First check of Judged manipulation: pass security
- Stability: Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window). security
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- Schema quality: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- First check of Schema quality: fail functional
- First check of Tool coverage: 42 functional
- First check of Destructive annotations: pass functional
- First check of Schema quality: fail functional
- First check of Schema quality: good functional
- First check of Tool coverage: 100 functional
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 −4
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 21 Sept 26 17
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 17 Oct 2026 · Analysed mcpb/https://github.com/nomina-xyz/nomina-mcp/releases/download/v2.0.7/Nomina.mcpb@2.0.7
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | mcpb |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 31 packages
| Packages resolved | 31 |
|---|---|
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
company_fundamentals Company fundamentals ~103
Latest reported financials and filings for a US-listed SEC registrant, from EDGAR XBRL. Example: AAPL, NVDA, TSLA. Returns latest annual (10-K) and quarterly (10-Q) revenue, net income, operating income, diluted EPS, assets, liabilities, equity, cash and operating cash flow with period dates, plus recent filing links. No prices, estimates or valuations.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticker | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
compare_assets Compare assets ~126
Compare 2–6 symbols over shared observation dates, each in its own unit. Example: ['BTC/USD', 'ETH/USD', 'SPY/USD'] or ['US2Y', 'US10Y']. Prices compare in percent, yields in percentage points; mixed selections are flagged as not directly comparable. Give start and end (YYYY-MM-DD) for an exact window instead of period.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| end | – | – | ISO date, inclusive; requires start. |
| period | string | – | – |
| start | – | – | ISO date, inclusive; requires end. |
| symbols | array | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
market_overview Market overview ~56
Snapshot of BTC, ETH, SOL, gold, SPY, QQQ, EUR/USD, US 2y/10y yields and CPI with period changes. Read-only; not a recommendation.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| period | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
research_asset Research an asset ~161
Research one symbol: latest value, period change, drawdown/volatility, dated history, headlines. Symbols: on-chain feeds like BTC/USD, ETH/USD, SPY/USD, EUR/USD, XAU/USD (BTC, btc-usd, BTCUSD also work); Treasury yields US1M..US30Y (e.g. US10Y); macro CPI, UNRATE, PAYEMS, AHE. Daily observations, weekly beyond two years, monthly for macro series. Give start and end (YYYY-MM-DD) for an exact window instead of period.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| end | – | – | ISO date, inclusive; requires start. |
| period | string | – | – |
| start | – | – | ISO date, inclusive; requires end. |
| symbol | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
search_markets Search markets catalog ~131
Find symbols in Nomina's catalog and recent headlines for an asset, company or topic. Catalog: Chainlink on-chain feeds (crypto, FX, gold, SPY/QQQ/NVDA/TSLA), Treasury tenors (US2Y, US10Y), BLS macro series (CPI, UNRATE), SEC registrants (for company_fundamentals). Examples: 'bitcoin', 'gold', 'nvidia', 'inflation'. Returns headlines, not article text.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | Maximum instruments per source and headlines. |
| query | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Nomina MCP server?
Nomina ships as an MCPB bundle, a single file you download and open in an MCP host that supports MCPB bundles, such as Claude Desktop. The host reads the launch command from the bundle's own manifest, so there is no command to copy. Before opening it, check the file's SHA-256 matches the one the MCP registry declares for it, f99e09dc9b39e207e10562080e5eec86b1bb9c82133a7dcd313da08b4bada832; the commands to do that are on this page. If it does not match, do not open it.
mcpb · Nomina.mcpb
Download bundleCheck the download matches the SHA-256 the MCP registry declares before you open it. If it does not match, do not open the file.
SHA-256
f99e09dc9b39e207e10562080e5eec86b1bb9c82133a7dcd313da08b4bada832
macOS / Linux
echo "f99e09dc9b39e207e10562080e5eec86b1bb9c82133a7dcd313da08b4bada832 Nomina.mcpb" | shasum -a 256 -c
Windows (PowerShell)
(Get-FileHash -Algorithm SHA256 .\Nomina.mcpb).Hash -eq "f99e09dc9b39e207e10562080e5eec86b1bb9c82133a7dcd313da08b4bada832"
Run it in the folder you saved the bundle to, then open the file with an MCPB-capable host such as Claude Desktop.
What is the Nomina MCP server?
Nomina is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.nomina-xyz/nomina-mcp. Read-only markets research from public data: on-chain prices, Treasury yields, macro, SEC filings. This page covers its MCPB bundle (https://github.com/nomina-xyz/nomina-mcp/releases/download/v2.0.7/Nomina.mcpb).
Is the Nomina MCP server safe to use?
Nomina scores 51 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Nomina MCP server expose?
Nomina exposes 5 tools: search_markets, research_asset, compare_assets, market_overview, company_fundamentals. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 577 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
What licence is the Nomina MCP server under?
Nomina declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.