no_human
PYPI · NO-HUMAN
File a task with your local no_human and check on it: task_add and task_status over stdio.
Available components
Last scanned (4 hours ago)
Scores higher than 46% of PyPI servers
Category Workflow Automation
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security94
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Declares code that runs automatically (build-time code we could not rule out (a Hatch, PDM or setuptools build hook, a dynamic version we could not read statically, shipped VCS metadata or a stray root module)) and that we could not recognise. It may be perfectly ordinary, but we have not established what it does. View diagnostics → Partial
- 3 of 46 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency100
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to no-human-ai/no_human). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 48 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema quality not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Protocol version not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified
Unverified: 5 categories
Categories scored 0 because our sandbox has not given us the schema these checks need to read. That is a gap on our side rather than a finding about the package, and we only credit what we can confirm, so the score stands at 0 until the capture succeeds. We are working through the fleet, so this normally clears without any action from you. How we score packages →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 3 Nov 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 30 Oct 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 29 Oct 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 24 Oct 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 23 Oct 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 14 Oct 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 13 Oct 26 +11
- Known CVEs: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Dependency health: unverified → 0.98 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/no-human@0.2.3
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | no-human-ai/no_human |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/no-human-ai/no_human/.github/workflows/publish-pypi.yml@refs/tags/v0.2.3 |
| Rekor log index | 2834425111 |
| Predicate type | PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha256:1a2417af2e4a4957d1ad75c10fd41799f3c925c35a9798ce88cfdcb9e2428675 |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 2 scripts
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | hatchling.build |
| build_hook | unreviewed | hatch_build.py,tool.hatch.build.targets.sdist.hooks.custom,tool.hatch.build.targets.wheel.hooks.custom |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 46 packages
| Packages resolved | 46 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 2 |
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. The most recent sandbox run could not capture a tool list from this package.
How do I install the no_human MCP server?
no_human runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx no-human. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · no-human
claude mcp add no-human-ai-no-human -- uvx no-human
What is the no_human MCP server?
no_human is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.no-human-ai/no_human. File a task with your local no_human and check on it: task_add and task_status over stdio. This page covers its PyPI package (no-human).
Is the no_human MCP server safe to use?
no_human scores 48 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
Is the no_human MCP server still maintained?
no_human is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the no_human MCP server under?
no_human declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.