Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

DataContractGate

NPM · @NIGHTMOOSE/CONTRACTGATE-MCP-SERVER

Infer, dry-run, deploy, and inspect DataContractGate semantic data contracts.

+18 this week 91 Trust /100

Last scanned (3 hours ago)

Scores higher than 93% of npm servers

Category Testing and QA

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 0 of 3 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to nightmoose/contractgate). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 3 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability85
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 618 tokens (~103/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management57
  • Stability observed for 17 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage98
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 95% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • All 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 16 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 14 Oct 26 +51
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Known CVEs: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Stability: unverified → 0.47 ▲ functional
    • Schema quality: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
    • Dependency health: unverified → 1.00 ▲ functional
    • Package version: 0.3.0 → 0.4.0 functional
  • 13 Oct 26 −50
    • Known CVEs: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.40 → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Dependency health: 1.00 → unverified ▼ functional
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • Schema quality: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • Package version: 0.3.0 → 0.4.0 functional
    • Package version: 0.3.0 → 0.3.2 functional
    • Package version: 0.3.0 → 0.3.1 functional
  • 12 Oct 26 +16
    • Provenance: fail → pass ▲ security
    • The attested source repository moved: nightmoose/contractgate security
    • Stability: unverified → 0.40 ▲ functional
    • Package version: 0.2.0 → 0.3.0 functional
  • 1 Oct 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 30 Sept 26 58

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 17 Oct 2026 · Analysed npm/@nightmoose/contractgate-mcp-server@0.4.0

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo nightmoose/contractgate
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/nightmoose/contractgate/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/tags/v0.4.0
Rekor log index 3245397630
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:36f35336d121d90d26ec3cc5cb823c860d1e0f9889c8bf3a2a7636ac87a5fd4b0a662531768f59edb17c2f49ac92ea805418288125892aba48167c22a

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 3 packages
Packages resolved 3
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~618 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
deploy_contract ~118

POST /contracts/deploy — find-or-create by name, insert YAML as stable, deprecate prior stable. 409 if that (name, version) exists: bump version in the YAML. Refused while quarantine is pending. Save the returned contract_id.

NameTypeReqDescription
deployed_bystring–Actor recorded on the version row
namestringyesContract name matching the YAML name: field
sourcestring–Logical feed name, e.g. app-backend
yaml_contentstringyesFull contract YAML

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

egress_validate ~174

POST /egress/{contract_id}. Validates an outbound payload against a deployed contract. dry_run defaults true — no audit row or quarantine. Returns the full response body (200/207/422) so you can read violations and repair the payload. Forward response.payload only — never the original body after a block or fail.

NameTypeReqDescription
contract_idstringyesDeployed contract UUID
dispositionstring–Default block. block = drop failing records from payload; fail = reject entire batch; tag = pass through with flags.
dry_runboolean–Default true. Set false only after a successful dry run — live calls write audit and quarantine rows.
eventsarrayyesOutbound payload objects to validate
versionstring–Pin a specific contract version. Default: latest stable.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_quarantine ~63

GET /quarantine — rejected events for the caller's org, newest first, with violation details.

NameTypeReqDescription
contract_idstring–Restrict to one contract
limitinteger–Default 100, max 500
offsetinteger––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

infer_contract ~91

Generate draft DataContractGate YAML from real JSON sample events via POST /contracts/infer. Does not persist. Review and write the YAML to contracts/<name>.yaml before deploying.

NameTypeReqDescription
descriptionstring–Optional contract description
namestringyesContract name, snake_case, e.g. user_events
samplesarrayyes1–20 real event objects. Do not invent them.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_contracts ~20

GET /contracts — identities the API key can see.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

validate_events ~152

Validate events. Pass contract_id to hit POST /v1/ingest/{id} (dry_run defaults true — no audit, quarantine, or usage). Pass yaml_content to hit POST /playground/validate per event (never persists). Exactly one of contract_id or yaml_content. 207/422 responses are returned as data so you can apply each violation's suggestion.

NameTypeReqDescription
contract_idstring–Deployed contract UUID from deploy_contract
dry_runboolean–Ingest only. Default true. Set false only after a successful dry run.
eventsarrayyesEvent objects to validate
yaml_contentstring–In-flight contract YAML; uses the playground, never persists

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the DataContractGate MCP server?

DataContractGate runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @nightmoose/contractgate-mcp-server. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @nightmoose/contractgate-mcp-server

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add nightmoose-contractgate -- npx -y @nightmoose/contractgate-mcp-server
Common questions

What is the DataContractGate MCP server?

DataContractGate is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.nightmoose/contractgate. Infer, dry-run, deploy, and inspect DataContractGate semantic data contracts. This page covers its npm package (@nightmoose/contractgate-mcp-server).

Is the DataContractGate MCP server safe to use?

DataContractGate scores 91 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 17 October 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the DataContractGate MCP server expose?

DataContractGate exposes 6 tools: infer_contract, validate_events, deploy_contract, get_quarantine, list_contracts, egress_validate. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 618 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the DataContractGate MCP server still maintained?

DataContractGate is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 17 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the DataContractGate MCP server under?

DataContractGate declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.