Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

LNX QR codes

REMOTE · QR.LNX.NET

Styled, print-ready QR codes for links, text, email or phone, with frames and custom colors.

Available components

+4 this week 79 Trust /100

Last scanned (13 hours ago)

Scores higher than 82% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 23 Oct 2026.

Category Design and Media

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability61
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 449 tokens (~449/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management73
  • Stability observed for 22 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage97
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 90% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 2 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 19 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 17 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 15 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 10 Oct 26 +2

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 6 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 23 Oct 2026 · Probed https://qr.lnx.net/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=qr.lnx.net CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 1 Oct 2026 30 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 5000a787ff617b5adcb2987d1dabdcb010c
SANs: qr.lnx.net
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of qr.lnx.net. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
net. present 37331 13 Verified
lnx.net. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
x-content-type-options nosniff

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://qr.lnx.net/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://qr.lnx.net/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://qr.lnx.net/mcp
MCP tools · 1 exposed · ~358 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
create_qr_code ~358

Creates a styled QR code for a link, text, email address or phone number and returns the image, a print-size PNG link and a link to edit it in the LNX QR studio. Choose a style and an optional frame with a short call to action (e.g. "SCAN FOR MENU").

NameTypeReqDescription
backgroundstring–Optional hex background color, e.g. #ffffff. Must be light.
colorstring–Optional hex color for the code itself, e.g. #1e3a8a; overrides the style's colors. Must be dark.
contentstringyesWhat the code opens: a URL, a text, an email address or a phone number (max 900 characters).
content_typestring–url (default), text, email (opens a new email) or phone (starts a call).
email_bodystring–email only: prefilled message.
email_subjectstring–email only: prefilled subject.
framestring–Frame around the code. none (default) or outline have no text; label-bottom, label-top, button, solid-card, ticket, tag, bubble, banner, arrow, corners, minimal, phone, double show frame_text.
frame_fontstring––
frame_textstring–Call to action shown in the frame, max 24 characters, e.g. "SCAN ME", "SCAN FOR MENU".
stylestring–Design. classic = plain black squares; rounded / dots = soft black shapes; violet, peach, forest, sunset = color gradients; sand, sky, rose, mint = single brand-like colors; ink-dots = black dots.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the LNX QR codes MCP server?

LNX QR codes is a hosted endpoint at https://qr.lnx.net/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · qr.lnx.net

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http net-lnx-qr 'https://qr.lnx.net/mcp'
Common questions

What is the LNX QR codes MCP server?

LNX QR codes is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as net.lnx/qr. Styled, print-ready QR codes for links, text, email or phone, with frames and custom colors. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://qr.lnx.net/mcp).

Is the LNX QR codes MCP server safe to use?

LNX QR codes scores 79 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the LNX QR codes MCP server expose?

LNX QR codes exposes 1 tool: create_qr_code. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 358 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the LNX QR codes MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to LNX QR codes without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the LNX QR codes MCP server still maintained?

LNX QR codes is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 23 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.