kebiao 课标
REMOTE · WWW.KEBIAO.ORG
Search and cite China's compulsory-education curriculum standards (2022, rev. 2025), 14 subjects.
Available components
Last scanned (21 minutes ago)
Scores higher than 60% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Education and Research
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability65
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1981 tokens (~198/item across 10 items; 10 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management7
- Stability observed for 2 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 10 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 11 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +2
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “find_textbook_chapter” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_standard” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “get_textbook_links” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “search_standards” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 155 → 198 ▼ functional
- MCP protocol: fail → pass ▲ functional
- Schema quality: good → excellent functional
- MCP protocol version: 2025-06-18 → 2026-07-28 functional
- Server version: 1.1.0 → 1.2.0 functional
- “find_textbook_chapter” added an optional parameter “edition” cosmetic
- “find_textbook_chapter” added an optional parameter “volume” cosmetic
- “find_textbook_chapter” reworded the description of “grade” cosmetic
- “find_textbook_chapter” reworded the description of “query” cosmetic
- “find_textbook_chapter” reworded the description of “subject” cosmetic
- Tool “find_textbook_chapter” changed its title: 从教材章节找课标 → 从教材的一课找课标 cosmetic
- 4 Nov 26 0
- Tool “find_textbook_chapter” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 1319 → 1558 ▼ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- New tool “check_objectives” functional
- 3 Nov 26 71
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.kebiao.org/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=*.kebiao.org | CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 12 Sept 2026 | 11 Dec 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 60dc8eedc35962599d1224f9f9e51e37607 |
| SANs: *.kebiao.org, kebiao.org | ||||||
| CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319 |
| CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of www.kebiao.org. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| org. | present | 725, 26974 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| kebiao.org. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000 |
| content-security-policy | object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'; frame-ancestors 'self' |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | no-referrer |
| permissions-policy | geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=() |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.kebiao.org/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.kebiao.org/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://www.kebiao.org/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_objectives 目标体检 ~222
老师已经写好的学习目标，逐条对照课标要点体检：依据哪条要点、出自要点原文的哪几个字、程度比要点高还是低、缺不缺条件/行为/程度，并给一条「学生能……」的改写；另查看不见的动词、主语不是学生、课标「不包括」的内容。给出学科、年级和课题（或要点编码）。Check a teacher's own learning objectives against the standards.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| codes | array | – | 这节课依据的要点或标准编码，可选；给了就按这些对照 |
| grade | string | – | 年级，例如「五年级」「8」 |
| objectives | string | yes | 老师写的学习目标，一行一条 |
| subject | string | yes | 学科，例如「数学」或 math |
| topic | string | – | 课题或教学内容，例如「分数的基本性质」，可选 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
compare_versions 2022 与 2025 修订对照 ~69
查看一条标准在 2025 修订版中改了哪些地方：改动的要点、修订版原文和其中新写入的文字。List what the 2025 revision changed in a standard.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| code | string | yes | 标准或要点编码 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
find_textbook_chapter 从教材的一课找课标 ~306
老师说的是教材里的一课时用它。把老师的原话放进 query 即可，例如「人教版 八年级上册 光的反射」「统编版四年级上册《观潮》」「五下 分数的基本性质」，工具会认出版本、年级、册次和学科。返回这一课「主要在教」「也涉及」的课标要点：要点原文和课标页码、教材里的原话和出处、这一课的课堂学习目标；再列机器按目录对齐的章节。对应关系是 AI 逐课判断，引用时注明「待核验」。找不到时如实告诉老师，不要编造。Find a textbook lesson the way teachers name it, with the standards it teaches.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| edition | string | – | 教材版本，可选，例如「人教版」「统编版」「北师大版」 |
| grade | string | – | 年级，可选，例如「八年级」「8」 |
| query | string | yes | 老师对这一课的说法，可以带版本和年级册次，例如「人教版 八年级上册 光的反射」；只写课题也可以 |
| subject | string | – | 学科，可选，例如「物理」 |
| volume | string | – | 册次，可选：上册、下册、全一册 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_check_questions 课堂诊断题 ~281
取课堂诊断题（语文、数学、英语、道德与法治、历史、地理、科学、物理、化学、生物学、信息科技、体育与健康、音乐、美术、劳动）：全班用手势、拇指或举草稿纸一起作答的题，每个错误答案对应一种常见错法（为什么会错、课上怎么接），附正确做法和三级阶梯练习，可直接投影放映。按学科、课标要点或标准编码、年级、或关键词查。kebiao 编写，对应教材单元或课标学段。Whole-class diagnostic questions with misconception-tagged wrong answers, every subject.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| code | string | – | 课标要点或标准编码，如 MA-S3-NA-01.3、PH-S4-MA-02.3 |
| grade | integer | – | 年级 1–9 |
| limit | integer | – | 最多返回几题，默认 3，最多 8 |
| subject | string | – | 学科，如「英语」或 english；不填时按编码判断，或在所有学科里找 |
| topic | string | – | 关键词，如「通分」「密度」「一般过去时」 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_stage_goals 学段目标 ~106
查看一门学科各学段的学段目标（体育为水平目标），课标原文，按核心素养或学科分组。语文、英语的学段要求/学段目标已是标准本身，请用 list_standards；初中新增五科只有一个学段。Stage goals of a subject.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| stage | string | – | 学段或年级，可选 |
| subject | string | yes | 学科 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_standard 查看一条标准 ~155
按编码查看一条课标：标准句（标明是课标原文还是 kebiao 整理）、全部要点原文和页码、学业要求、链接。接受标准编码（MA-S2-NA-02）、要点编码（MA-S2-NA-02.1）和 2022 年版旧编码（MA-D2-AL-005，会说明它并入了哪条新标准）。编码请从其他工具的结果里复制，不要自己拼；编码不存在时，会返回同学科同学段的真实编码供选择。Look up one standard by code.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| code | string | yes | 标准、要点或旧编码 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_textbook_links 标准对应的教材 ~108
从一条课标反查教材：查看一条标准或要点在哪些教材的哪一课教（人教版、统编版等）：AI 逐课读了教材原文判断，每条附这一课教材的原话和页码；没有逐课结果的，再列机器对齐的单元。都待核验。Textbook lessons and chapters for a standard.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| code | string | yes | 标准或要点编码 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_standards 列出一门学科的标准 ~87
列出一门学科（可限定一个学段）的全部标准：编码、名称、领域、要点条数。适合先看全貌再用 get_standard 看细节。List a subject's standards.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| stage | string | – | 学段或年级，可选 |
| subject | string | yes | 学科，例如「历史」或 history |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_subjects 列出学科 ~61
列出 kebiao 收录的义务教育课程标准学科（14 门，2022年版2025年修订）、各学科的学段和标准、要点条数。List the subjects, their stages and counts.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_standards 检索课标 ~210
老师说的是教学内容或主题时用它：用一句话检索义务教育课程标准（2025 修订版），返回最相关的标准、命中的要点原文、页码和链接，可按学科、学段筛选。例如「三年级科学里讲植物生长的课标」「初中物理 浮力」。老师说的是教材里的某一课时，改用 find_textbook_chapter。结果里的编码可以直接传给 get_standard 取全部要点。Search the standards by topic.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | 返回条数，默认 5 |
| query | string | yes | 要找的教学内容或主题，例如「分数的大小比较」「辛亥革命」 |
| stage | string | – | 学段或年级，可选，例如「3-4」「五年级」「初中」 |
| subject | string | – | 学科，可选，例如「数学」或 math |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the kebiao 课标 MCP server?
kebiao 课标 is a hosted endpoint at https://www.kebiao.org/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · www.kebiao.org
claude mcp add --transport http nbrangerf-kebiao 'https://www.kebiao.org/mcp'
What is the kebiao 课标 MCP server?
kebiao 课标 is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.NBrangerF/kebiao. Search and cite China's compulsory-education curriculum standards (2022, rev. 2025), 14 subjects. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.kebiao.org/mcp).
Is the kebiao 课标 MCP server safe to use?
kebiao 课标 scores 73 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the kebiao 课标 MCP server expose?
kebiao 课标 exposes 10 tools: list_subjects, search_standards, get_standard, list_standards, get_stage_goals, and 5 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,605 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the kebiao 课标 MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to kebiao 课标 without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the kebiao 课标 MCP server still maintained?
kebiao 课标 is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.