io.github.naoanao/safe-agent-mcp
PYPI · SAFE-AGENT-MCP
Audit API-key privileges, check idempotency patterns, explain AI-agent guard patterns. Read-only.
Available components
Last scanned (55 minutes ago)
Scores higher than 74% of PyPI servers
Category Security
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 1 of 15 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency97
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to naoanao/safe-agent-mcp). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 6 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability67
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 225 tokens (~75/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage71
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 3 Nov 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 2 Nov 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 30 Oct 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 29 Oct 26 77
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/safe-agent-mcp@0.1.0
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | naoanao/safe-agent-mcp |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/naoanao/safe-agent-mcp/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/tags/v0.1.0 |
| Rekor log index | 3560801494 |
| Predicate type | PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha256:e88bcd65382615db649c9743b3e6ace90286b32763ca783deb2da8e7b1851a42 |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | hatchling.build |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 15 packages
| Packages resolved | 15 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
audit_api_keys Audit Api Keys ~95
Audit API keys for over-privilege using permission *descriptions* only. Pass entries like {"name": "stripe-main", "service": "Stripe", "scopes": ["charges:write", "refunds:write"]}. NEVER pass actual key values — entries that look like secrets are rejected, not stored. Returns a per-key risk level with reasons and a summary count.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| keys | array | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
check_idempotency_pattern Check Idempotency Pattern ~72
Check a code snippet for the signals that stop duplicate execution. Paste the function that performs the side effect (sending, charging, writing). Returns which guard signals are present, which are missing, and a plain verdict. Read-only static check — the code is not executed.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| code | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
explain_guard_pattern Explain Guard Pattern ~58
Explain one production guard pattern: what failure it prevents and its minimal shape. Known patterns: idempotency_key, approval_gate, outbox, key_inventory, circuit_breaker, signed_approval_link.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| pattern | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
How do I install the io.github.naoanao/safe-agent-mcp server?
io.github.naoanao/safe-agent-mcp runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx safe-agent-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · safe-agent-mcp
claude mcp add naoanao-safe-agent-mcp -- uvx safe-agent-mcp
What is the io.github.naoanao/safe-agent-mcp server?
io.github.naoanao/safe-agent-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.naoanao/safe-agent-mcp. Audit API-key privileges, check idempotency patterns, explain AI-agent guard patterns. Read-only. This page covers its PyPI package (safe-agent-mcp).
Is the io.github.naoanao/safe-agent-mcp server safe to use?
io.github.naoanao/safe-agent-mcp scores 77 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.naoanao/safe-agent-mcp server expose?
io.github.naoanao/safe-agent-mcp exposes 3 tools: audit_api_keys, check_idempotency_pattern, explain_guard_pattern. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 225 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.naoanao/safe-agent-mcp server still maintained?
io.github.naoanao/safe-agent-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.naoanao/safe-agent-mcp server under?
io.github.naoanao/safe-agent-mcp declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.