nanoodle
REMOTE · MCP.NANOODLE.COM · 2 COMPONENTS
Your saved nanoodle workflow graphs as MCP tools — BYOK or pay per call in Nano (x402)
Available components
Last scanned (2 hours ago)
Scores higher than 46% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 17 Oct 2026.
Category Design and Media
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security57
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 8 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability55
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 3370 tokens (~421/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management38
- Stability check failed: schema churn in the 30 days we've observed: 8 tool removals, 0 breaking changes, 0 auth/transport breaks, 3 additions. See how to fix → Fail
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 17 Oct 26 0
- Tool “character-sprites” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 16 Oct 26 0
- Tool “character-sprites” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 15 Oct 26 0
- Tool “storyboard-relay” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “talking-avatar” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “character-sprites” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “neon-shrine-duel” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 14 Oct 26 −1
- Tool “tiny-world-film” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: excellent → good functional
- 13 Oct 26 0
- Tool “character-sprites” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “storyboard-relay” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 12 Oct 26 0
- Tool “photo-to-video” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “sing” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “character-sprites” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- 10 Oct 26 −5
- A breaking change shipped without a version bump: still 0.6.0 ▼ security
- Tool “omni-flash-turntable” was removed ▼ security
- Tool “combine-images” was removed ▼ security
- Tool “deslop” was removed ▼ security
- Tool “edit-a-photo” was removed ▼ security
- Tool “favicon” was removed ▼ security
- Tool “fibo-studio-still” was removed ▼ security
- Tool “night-market-postcard” was removed ▼ security
- Tool “render-a-mockup” was removed ▼ security
- Tool “talking-avatar” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “character-sprites” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “image-model-arena” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “photo-to-video” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “sing” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 4929 → 3330 ▲ functional
- New tool “neon-shrine-duel” functional
- New tool “storyboard-relay” functional
- New tool “tiny-world-film” functional
- “sing” added an optional parameter “Arrange_the_song” cosmetic
- “sing” added an optional parameter “Preferred_bands” cosmetic
- “sing” added an optional parameter “Song_idea” cosmetic
- “sing” added an optional parameter “What_would_clash” cosmetic
- “sing” added an optional parameter “Write_lyrics” cosmetic
- “sing” dropped the optional parameter “Lyrics” cosmetic
- “sing” dropped the optional parameter “Musical_style” cosmetic
- “sing” dropped the optional parameter “Song_Instructions” cosmetic
- 4 Oct 26 0
- Tool “favicon” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “talking-avatar” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 17 Oct 2026 · Probed https://mcp.nanoodle.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=mcp.nanoodle.com | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 19 Sept 2026 | 18 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 68122c0b5385f359da64f68d0102cd51a5c |
| SANs: mcp.nanoodle.com | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of mcp.nanoodle.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| nanoodle.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.nanoodle.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.nanoodle.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://mcp.nanoodle.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
character-sprites ~376
Description → canonical character → separate cutout parts → local rig and animation baking. One text call + two image calls. The companion rig.mjs extracts transparent parts and bakes 32 frames: id… text:Character -> llm:Character designer -> image:Canonical character -> resize:Reference -> edit:Rig parts; returns image + image (muse-image/edit, 1:1) saved to disk (file paths in result). Runs on NanoGPT — $0.06 deposit per call, paid in Nano (XNO) — settles at actual model cost + 20%, change returned; no account needed; last run $0.0221, ~1m 48s. Example: Iron Verdict (https://nanoodle.com/examples/iron-verdict/). A playable fighting game built with character-sprites. This graph generates a character reference and parts sheet; the local skill bakes animated sprites, and a coding agent adds combat, gravity and game rules. Agent skill: https://github.com/nanoodlecom/noodle-skills/tree/main/skills/character-sprites
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Character | string | – | Text; default: "A compact furnace knight with a cracked ivory helmet, narrow glowing amber visor, dark navy armor, a short rust-red s..."; optional |
| Character_designer | string | – | System prompt; default: "Write ONE image prompt, maximum 130 words, for a game character reference from the description. Preserve the user des..."; optional |
| _payment_id | string | – | Payment id from this tool's previous payment-required response. Phase 3 only: after /x402/watch closes with status paid, call again with the same arguments plus this id to open the RESULTS stream. Do… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
image-model-arena ~385
Compare four image models on the same brief. Run makes four paid images. Judge the exact heading and footer, object count, tool shapes, composition and color. Change the shared brief to test your o… text:Shared test brief -> image:Contender 1 -> image:Contender 2 -> image:Contender 3 -> image:Contender 4; returns image (muse-image/text-to-image, 1:1) + image (gpt-image-2.5/flare/text-to-image, 1k) + image (grok-imagine-image/v2.0/text-to-image, 1:1) + image (recraft-v4, 1024×1024) saved to disk (file paths in result). Runs on NanoGPT — $0.40 deposit per call, paid in Nano (XNO) — settles at actual model cost + 20%, change returned; no account needed; last run $0.2455, ~1m 39s. Example: Reviewed sample (https://nanoodle.com/examples/gallery/#image-model-arena). The same bicycle-repair poster brief sent to four image models. All four retained the requested text in this run; only Grok rendered recognizable tire levers. Compare all outputs before choosing.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared_test_brief | string | – | Text; default: "Create a square poster for a bicycle repair workshop. Exact heading: FIX A FLAT. Exact footer: SATURDAY 10 AM. A sing..."; optional |
| _payment_id | string | – | Payment id from this tool's previous payment-required response. Phase 3 only: after /x402/watch closes with status paid, call again with the same arguments plus this id to open the RESULTS stream. Do… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
neon-shrine-duel ~358
seed → GLM writes Anima still prompt → anima/text-to-image → GLM writes H3 Max motion prompt → minimax/h3-max i2v at 480p/5s. Change the seed; both LLMs rewrite prompts. ~$0.27 sampled. Hold both f… text:Fight seed -> llm:Still prompt -> llm:Motion prompt -> image:Fight still -> ivideo:Clash clip; returns video (h3-max) saved to disk (file path in result). Runs on NanoGPT — $0.63 deposit per call, paid in Nano (XNO) — settles at actual model cost + 20%, change returned; no account needed; last run $0.2601, ~47s.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fight_seed | string | – | Text; default: "Neon shrine rooftop duel at midnight — fox-masked sword dancer vs chrome oni courier, rain, sakura sparks, cinematic ..."; optional |
| Motion_prompt | string | – | System prompt; default: "You write ONE image-to-video motion prompt for MiniMax H3 Max. Rules: BOTH fighters stay fully in frame the entire cl..."; optional |
| Still_prompt | string | – | System prompt; default: "You write ONE elite image prompt for anime key art (Anima text-to-image). Rules: single frozen moment mid-action (not..."; optional |
| _payment_id | string | – | Payment id from this tool's previous payment-required response. Phase 3 only: after /x402/watch closes with status paid, call again with the same arguments plus this id to open the RESULTS stream. Do… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
photo-to-video ~343
Create a first frame with Muse, then animate one small movement with MiniMax H3 Spicy at 480p for five seconds. Change the still and motion briefs together. Inspect object stability and motion; a s… text:Still brief -> text:Motion brief -> image:First frame -> ivideo:Animated clip; returns video (image-to-video-spicy) saved to disk (file path in result). Runs on NanoGPT — $0.51 deposit per call, paid in Nano (XNO) — settles at actual model cost + 20%, change returned; no account needed; last run $0.21, ~1m 30s. Example: Reviewed sample (https://nanoodle.com/examples/gallery/#photo-to-video). A short tea-on-a-desk animation. Sampled frames retained the mug while steam moved. This thumbnail is one frame; the example does not establish a seamless loop.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motion_brief | string | – | Text; default: "Locked camera for five seconds. A thin wisp of steam rises slowly from the tea and curls gently in the window light. ..."; optional |
| Still_brief | string | – | Text; default: "A ceramic mug of hot tea on an oak desk beside a closed notebook. Soft morning window light from the left, plain warm..."; optional |
| _payment_id | string | – | Payment id from this tool's previous payment-required response. Phase 3 only: after /x402/watch closes with status paid, call again with the same arguments plus this id to open the RESULTS stream. Do… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
sing ~470
Start with a song idea and the bands you like. Three text calls write lyrics, arrange them, and identify what would clash with that arrangement. The arrangement and avoid-list become one musical di… text:Song idea -> text:Preferred bands -> join:Idea + musical references -> llm:Write lyrics -> join:Brief + finished lyrics -> llm:Arrange the song -> llm:What would clash? -> join:Arrangement + avoid-list -> music:Sing; returns audio (music-3) saved to disk (file path in result). Runs on NanoGPT — $0.37 deposit per call, paid in Nano (XNO) — settles at actual model cost + 20%, change returned; no account needed; last run $0.1502, ~2m 35s. Example: Audio sample (https://nanoodle.com/examples/gallery/#sing). A 170-second generated closing-credits song. Gemini 3.8 Flash reported clear gentle acoustic vocals and a chorus matching the supplied lyrics. This is model-assisted audio review, not human listening sign-off.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arrange_the_song | string | – | System prompt; default: "Write one compact music-generator prompt: a single paragraph, at most 60 words and 450 characters. Use the supplied i..."; optional |
| Preferred_bands | string | – | Text; default: "Portishead, Massive Attack, Tricky"; optional |
| Song_idea | string | – | Text; default: "Write a wistful 90s trip-hop track about the singularity."; optional |
| What_would_clash | string | – | System prompt; default: "Read the actual arrangement. Name exactly three specific musical choices that would undermine its groove, instruments..."; optional |
| Write_lyrics | string | – | System prompt; default: "Write original, singable lyrics from the song idea and musical references. Maximum 200 words. Use concrete images, an..."; optional |
| _payment_id | string | – | Payment id from this tool's previous payment-required response. Phase 3 only: after /x402/watch closes with status paid, call again with the same arguments plus this id to open the RESULTS stream. Do… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
storyboard-relay ~493
Make a two-frame story through a handoff between models. Muse establishes the opening. Nano Banana stages the next beat from that actual image. Gemini compares both frames; Muse Edit uses the draft… text:First scene -> text:Next beat -> text:Continuity rules -> image:Muse opens the story -> join:Opening brief + next beat -> resize:Frame 1 -> join:Next beat + continuity rules -> edit:Nano Banana stages the next beat -> llm:Draft continuity check -> resize:Draft frame 2 -> join:Story + observed repair notes -> edit:Muse repairs the continuity -> resize:Frame 2 -> llm:Continuity notes; returns image + image + image + text; media saved to disk (file paths in result). Runs on NanoGPT — $0.19 deposit per call, paid in Nano (XNO) — settles at actual model cost + 20%, change returned; no account needed; last run $0.0652, ~2m 4s.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuity_notes | string | – | System prompt; default: "Independently compare TWO actual images. Image 1 is the original opening; image 2 is the repaired next frame. You hav..."; optional |
| Continuity_rules | string | – | Text; default: "Keep the same robot's rounded cream body, single round amber eye, dark-blue legs, orange satchel and relative proport..."; optional |
| Draft_continuity_check | string | – | System prompt; default: "You are a film continuity reader comparing TWO actual images. Image 1 is the opening frame; image 2 is the draft next..."; optional |
| First_scene | string | – | Text; default: "First frame of an original two-scene story. A tiny postal robot has a rounded cream enamel body, one round amber eye,..."; optional |
| Next_beat | string | – | Text; default: "Create the next story beat inside the greenhouse. The robot is now crouched beside a circular soil tray, carefully pl..."; optional |
| _payment_id | string | – | Payment id from this tool's previous payment-required response. Phase 3 only: after /x402/watch closes with status paid, call again with the same arguments plus this id to open the RESULTS stream. Do… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
talking-avatar ~363
Create a short spoken introduction with a fictional presenter. Muse makes the portrait, MiniMax Speech reads the script, and LongCat combines the image and audio into a speaking video at 480p. Keep… text:Presenter look -> text:Spoken script -> text:Delivery -> image:face -> tts -> lipsync; returns video (longcat-avatar-1.5) saved to disk (file path in result). Runs on NanoGPT — $0.66 deposit per call, paid in Nano (XNO) — settles at actual model cost + 20%, change returned; no account needed. Example: Video sample (https://nanoodle.com/examples/gallery/#talking-avatar). A fictional presenter reads a short workshop introduction. Sampled frames preserve the presenter; check precise lip-sync timing in playback. Generation can take several minutes.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delivery | string | – | Text; default: "Natural calm delivery, subtle blinks and small head movements. Keep the face and mouth visible, eyes toward the camer..."; optional |
| Presenter_look | string | – | Text; default: "A fictional friendly male museum guide in his thirties, wearing a plain navy shirt, shoulders-up front-facing portrai..."; optional |
| Spoken_script | string | – | Text; default: "Welcome to the workshop. Start with the blue tray on your table. Inside you will find paper, a pencil, and the parts ..."; optional |
| _payment_id | string | – | Payment id from this tool's previous payment-required response. Phase 3 only: after /x402/watch closes with status paid, call again with the same arguments plus this id to open the RESULTS stream. Do… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
tiny-world-film ~298
Muse builds a miniature. Wan animates that exact image. Mirelo watches the resulting silent clip and adds foley. Three models pass actual media forward. Compare the silent and sounded takes. Defaul… text:World -> text:Motion -> image:Build the miniature -> ivideo:Silent take -> resize:First frame -> vedit:Film with foley; returns image + video (sfx1.6/video-to-video) saved to disk (file paths in result). Runs on NanoGPT — $0.65 deposit per call, paid in Nano (XNO) — settles at actual model cost + 20%, change returned; no account needed; last run $0.27, ~2m 11s.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motion | string | – | Text; default: "One continuous locked-off macro shot. The copper waterwheel turns slowly and steadily as the stream runs over its pad..."; optional |
| World | string | – | Text; default: "A handmade miniature walnut-shell watermill on a mossy stone beside a tiny stream. One large copper paddle wheel is a..."; optional |
| _payment_id | string | – | Payment id from this tool's previous payment-required response. Phase 3 only: after /x402/watch closes with status paid, call again with the same arguments plus this id to open the RESULTS stream. Do… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the nanoodle MCP server?
nanoodle is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.nanoodle.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.nanoodle.com
claude mcp add --transport http nanoodlecom-nanoodle-mcp 'https://mcp.nanoodle.com/mcp'
What is the nanoodle MCP server?
nanoodle is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.nanoodlecom/nanoodle-mcp. Your saved nanoodle workflow graphs as MCP tools, BYOK or pay per call in Nano (x402). This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.nanoodle.com/mcp).
Is the nanoodle MCP server safe to use?
nanoodle scores 64 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the nanoodle MCP server expose?
nanoodle exposes 8 tools: character-sprites, image-model-arena, neon-shrine-duel, photo-to-video, sing, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 3,086 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the nanoodle MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to nanoodle without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the nanoodle MCP server still maintained?
nanoodle is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 17 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.