Codigest
PYPI · CODIGEST
Terminal output, project snapshots and semantic diffs as LLM-ready context
Available components
Last scanned (22 hours ago)
Scores higher than 46% of PyPI servers
Category Developer Tools
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security97
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- Known CVEs were checked across the 15 of 16 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree.Partial
- Runs uv_build at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- Dependency health was assessed across the 15 of 16 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency97
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to NaNIsaac/codigest). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 6 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema quality not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Protocol version not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified
Unverified: 5 categories
Categories scored 0 because our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema for these checks to read. That is a gap on our side rather than a finding about the package, and we only credit what we can confirm, so the score stands at 0 until we can run it. How we score packages →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 2 Nov 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 1 Nov 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 30 Oct 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 29 Oct 26 0
- Stability: Stability not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to compare. security
- Tool safety: Tool safety not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool text to scan. security
- Schema quality: Schema quality not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to assess. functional
- Capabilities: Protocol version not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we never saw its MCP handshake. functional
- Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool definitions to assess. functional
- 28 Oct 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Tool safety: Tool safety not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the tool definitions this version of the package serves yet. security
- Stability: Stability not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet. security
- Capabilities: Protocol version not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP handshake this version of the package performs yet. functional
- Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the tool definitions this version of the package serves yet. functional
- Schema quality: Schema quality not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet. functional
- Package version: 0.12.2 → 0.13.0 functional
- 26 Oct 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 24 Oct 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/codigest@0.13.0
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | NaNIsaac/codigest |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/NaNIsaac/codigest/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/tags/v0.13.0 |
| Rekor log index | 3546070182 |
| Predicate type | PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha256:1be16560742375deb11c0dd70c0fc236ff1417c596911a6db42f5659338037b6 |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | uv_build |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 15 packages
| Packages resolved | 15 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 5 |
| Tree resolution | Partial |
The dependency tree was only partially resolved, so these counts may be incomplete.
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. Our sandbox could not run this package, so no tool list has been captured. That is a gap on our side, not a finding about the package.
How do I install the Codigest MCP server?
Codigest runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx codigest. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · codigest
claude mcp add nanisaac-codigest -- uvx codigest
What is the Codigest MCP server?
Codigest is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.NaNIsaac/codigest. Terminal output, project snapshots and semantic diffs as LLM-ready context. This page covers its PyPI package (codigest).
Is the Codigest MCP server safe to use?
Codigest scores 49 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
Is the Codigest MCP server still maintained?
Codigest is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Codigest MCP server under?
Codigest declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.