io.github.Muralnick/sugo
PYPI · SUGO-CLI
Local, offline conversion of PDFs, Office files and screenshots into compact Markdown.
Available components
Last scanned (18 hours ago)
Scores higher than 50% of PyPI servers
Category Documents and Files
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security99
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs uv_build at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 6 of 47 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency100
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to Muralnick/sugo). View diagnostics → Pass
- Clear OSI-approved license (AGPL-3.0-or-later).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 0 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema quality not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Protocol version not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified
Unverified: 5 categories
Categories scored 0 because our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema for these checks to read. That is a gap on our side rather than a finding about the package, and we only credit what we can confirm, so the score stands at 0 until we can run it. How we score packages →
Checks we ran (9)
- Malware scan
- Known CVEs
- Install scripts
- Dependency health
- Source repository
- Provenance
- License
- Maintenance
- Security disclosure
Checks we could not complete (5)
These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.
- Schema quality in Schema Quality & AI Usability (scores 0 for this)Schema quality not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to assess.
- Stability in Stability & Change Management (scores 0 for this)Stability not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no schema to compare.
- Tool coverage in Tool Coverage (scores 0 for this)Tool coverage not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool definitions to assess.
- Tool safety in Tool Safety (scores 0 for this)Tool safety not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we have no tool text to scan.
- Capabilities in Capabilities (scores 0 for this)Protocol version not yet verified: our sandbox could not run this package, so we never saw its MCP handshake.
Does not apply to this package (2)
- Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
- Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 10 Nov 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 9 Nov 26 +35
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- CVE-2026-112393 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- CVE-2026-96639 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- CVE-2026-112398 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- CVE-2026-112900 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- CVE-2026-112403 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- Known CVEs: fail → pass ▲ security
- Score status: failed → scored ▲ functional
- Package version: 0.1.2 → 0.1.4 functional
- 8 Nov 26 0
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 7 Nov 26 0
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 10 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/sugo-cli@0.1.4
Provenance Verified
A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.
| Result | Verified |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
| Reason | Verified |
| Discovered via | Registry attestation endpoint |
| Source repo | Muralnick/sugo |
| Certificate issuer | https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com |
| Certificate SAN | https://github.com/Muralnick/sugo/.github/workflows/release.yml@refs/tags/v0.1.4 |
| Rekor log index | 3767258348 |
| Predicate type | PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1 |
| Subject digest | sha256:789bd88821d6f267518dd24c0c286a035d5a45da2c207747adc83214b4062212 |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | Known build tool | uv_build |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 47 packages
| Packages resolved | 47 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 4 |
| No linked repository | 2 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. The most recent sandbox run could not capture a tool list from this package.
How do I install the io.github.Muralnick/sugo MCP server?
io.github.Muralnick/sugo runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx sugo-cli mcp, plus the required --root, which you supply. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · sugo-cli
claude mcp add muralnick-sugo -- uvx sugo-cli mcp
Incomplete: the registry marks --root as required and gives no value we can show, so it is not in this command. Add it before you run it.
What is the io.github.Muralnick/sugo MCP server?
io.github.Muralnick/sugo is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Muralnick/sugo. Local, offline conversion of PDFs, Office files and screenshots into compact Markdown. This page covers its PyPI package (sugo-cli).
Is the io.github.Muralnick/sugo MCP server safe to use?
io.github.Muralnick/sugo scores 50 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 10 November 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
Is the io.github.Muralnick/sugo MCP server still maintained?
io.github.Muralnick/sugo is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 10 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.Muralnick/sugo MCP server under?
io.github.Muralnick/sugo declares the AGPL-3.0-or-later licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.
What did VerifyMCP test on the io.github.Muralnick/sugo MCP server?
VerifyMCP ran 9 checks on io.github.Muralnick/sugo, covering Malware scan, Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health and 5 more. 5 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about io.github.Muralnick/sugo: Schema quality, Stability, Tool coverage, Tool safety and 1 more. 5 categories score 0 for that reason, because we only credit what we can confirm. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to a PyPI package, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.