Daepak Market Intelligence
PYPI · DAEPAK-MCP · 2 COMPONENTS · SCANNED SEP 20
Market analyst tools + AI agent: crypto, US equities, options, Korea, fundamentals, macro, backtests
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised native-build step with no shell scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 0 of 1 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 15 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Instruction-quality not yet verified: the AI judgement didn't run.Unverified
- Nothing to assess: this server exposes no tool/resource definitions to measure a footprint for. See how to fix → Fail
- Nothing to assess: this server has no tools to check for usage examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management63
- Stability observed for 19 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage0
- Nothing to assess: this server exposes no tools, so there are no tool definitions to check for coverage.Fail
Tool Safety0
- Injection markers not yet verified: our capture carried no server instructions, tool names or descriptions for the scan to read.Unverified
- Destructive-tool annotations not yet verified: our capture listed no tools, so there were no annotations to read.Unverified
- Manipulation not yet verified: our capture carried no tool text for a judge to read, so we will not certify text no model has read as clean.Unverified
Capabilities20
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
How do I install the Daepak Market Intelligence MCP server?
Daepak Market Intelligence runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx daepak-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · daepak-mcp
claude mcp add mobiss11-daepak-mcp -- uvx daepak-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"mobiss11-daepak-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"daepak-mcp"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"mobiss11-daepak-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"daepak-mcp"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add mobiss11-daepak-mcp -- uvx daepak-mcp
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"mobiss11-daepak-mcp": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"uvx",
"daepak-mcp"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add mobiss11-daepak-mcp --command uvx --arg daepak-mcp
mcp_servers:
mobiss11-daepak-mcp:
command: "uvx"
args: ["daepak-mcp"] {
"McpServers": {
"mobiss11-daepak-mcp": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "uvx",
"Arguments": [
"daepak-mcp"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add mobiss11-daepak-mcp -t stdio -c uvx -a daepak-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"mobiss11-daepak-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"daepak-mcp"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Sept 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 14 Sept 26 −14
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 12 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 7 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed pypi/daepak-mcp@2.1.1
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | hatchling.build |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 1 package
| Packages resolved | 1 |
|---|---|
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
The sandbox run completed and this package exposed no tools.
What is the Daepak Market Intelligence MCP server?
Daepak Market Intelligence is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Mobiss11/daepak-mcp. Market analyst tools + AI agent: crypto, US equities, options, Korea, fundamentals, macro, backtests. This page covers its PyPI package (daepak-mcp).
Is the Daepak Market Intelligence MCP server safe to use?
Daepak Market Intelligence scores 49 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Daepak Market Intelligence MCP server expose?
Daepak Market Intelligence exposes no tools. We connected to it and read its tool list, and it was empty, so it offers an MCP client nothing to call.
Is the Daepak Market Intelligence MCP server still maintained?
Daepak Market Intelligence is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Daepak Market Intelligence MCP server under?
Daepak Market Intelligence declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.