io.github.minsooparkk/korea-tax-law-mcp
REMOTE · MCP.TAXJARVIS.COM · SCANNED SEP 26
Korean tax law graph: current statutes, 150k+ court/tribunal cases, 145k+ NTS rulings.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security57
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 12 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability70
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2208 tokens (~157/item across 14 items; 14 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management90
- Stability observed for 27 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage91
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 70% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
- Structured output schemas are declared (14% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 14 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 15 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
How do I install the io.github.minsooparkk/korea-tax-law-mcp server?
io.github.minsooparkk/korea-tax-law-mcp is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.taxjarvis.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.taxjarvis.com
claude mcp add --transport http minsooparkk-korea-tax-law-mcp 'https://mcp.taxjarvis.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"minsooparkk-korea-tax-law-mcp": {
"url": "https://mcp.taxjarvis.com/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"minsooparkk-korea-tax-law-mcp": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.taxjarvis.com/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.minsooparkk-korea-tax-law-mcp] url = "https://mcp.taxjarvis.com/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"minsooparkk-korea-tax-law-mcp": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://mcp.taxjarvis.com/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add minsooparkk-korea-tax-law-mcp --url 'https://mcp.taxjarvis.com/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
minsooparkk-korea-tax-law-mcp:
url: "https://mcp.taxjarvis.com/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"minsooparkk-korea-tax-law-mcp": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://mcp.taxjarvis.com/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add minsooparkk-korea-tax-law-mcp -t streamable-http -u 'https://mcp.taxjarvis.com/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"minsooparkk-korea-tax-law-mcp": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://mcp.taxjarvis.com/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 26 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 24 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 83. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 25 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 60 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 18 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 13 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 26 Sept 2026 · Probed https://mcp.taxjarvis.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=taxjarvis.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 9 Aug 2026 | 7 Nov 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 8e5e9e8e9983aad613e2e989116b5839 |
| SANs: taxjarvis.com, *.taxjarvis.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of mcp.taxjarvis.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| taxjarvis.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.taxjarvis.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.taxjarvis.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://mcp.taxjarvis.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_annex ~103
특정 별표·서식의 본문을 반환한다. 조문이 '별표 N에 따른다'로 위임한 세율·기준금액을 확인할 때 사용.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| annex_number | string | yes | '별표 2', '별표 1의3', '서식 1' 또는 숫자만 |
| law_name | string | yes | 법령명 (예: '소득세법 시행령') |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_article ~137
특정 조문의 현행 원문 전체를 반환한다 (시행일·검증된 위임 상·하위법령·별표·검증된 인용 포함). 세율·한도·요건 등 정확한 수치는 반드시 이 도구로 원문을 확인할 것. 인용은 적용 확정이 아니다.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| article_number | string | yes | 조번호 (예: '제97조의2', '97조의2', '55') |
| law_name | string | yes | 법령명 (예: '소득세법', '상속세 및 증여세법') |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_article_history ~81
특정 조문의 개정 연혁(버전 이력, 개정 표기, 검증·원천 여부)을 반환한다. '언제 바뀌었나' 질문에 사용. 미검증 버전은 적용 단정에 쓰지 말 것.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| article_number | string | yes | – |
| law_name | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_evidence ~151
search_tax가 찾은 근거의 DB 원문을 읽는다. 판례·해석례·예규·조문·통칙·별표·부칙·조약·역사버전을 지원. 긴 본문은 next_offset까지 반복하면 누락 없이 읽을 수 있다. summary_only는 원문 전문이 없는 요지임. 적용 시점 미해소를 현행으로 보충하지 말 것.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| evidence_id | string | yes | – |
| evidence_type | string | yes | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| offset | integer | – | – |
| source_field | string | – | 선택: original_text.available_fields의 다른 원문 필드 조회 |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_treaty_article ~92
특정국 조세조약의 조문 원문 전체를 국문·영문으로 반환한다. 제한세율 등 정확한 수치는 반드시 이 도구로 원문을 확인할 것.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| article_number | string | yes | 조번호 (예: '제12조', '12') |
| country | string | yes | 체결국 한글명 (예: '미국') |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_laws ~77
이 DB에 수록된 현행 세법 법령 목록(법률·시행령·시행규칙)과 시행일을 반환한다. 국세청 조세법령 목록의 현행만 포함하며 목록 역사 법령은 제외. 다른 도구를 쓰기 전 수록 범위 확인용.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_treaties ~107
한국이 체결한 조세조약(이중과세방지협약) 수록 현황을 반환한다. country 없이 호출하면 체결국 목록, country를 주면 그 나라 조약(협약·개정의정서·교환각서) 목록과 발효일.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| country | string | – | 체결국 한글명 (예: '미국', '일본'). 생략하면 전체 체결국 목록 |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_upcoming ~82
공포됐으나 아직 시행 전인 개정(시행예정)을 반환한다. 시행일·법령·달라지는 조문 목록. 미래 과세기간이 걸린 질문에서 현행 조문만 보고 답하지 않도록 확인용.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| law_name | string | – | 법령명 필터 (생략 시 전체) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_annexes ~123
법령 별표·서식을 전문검색한다. 세율표·기준금액·한도·분류표는 조문이 아니라 별표에 있는 경우가 많다 (예: 근로소득 간이세액표, 면세 미가공식료품 분류표).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| law_name | string | – | 법령명 필터 (부분 일치) |
| limit | integer | – | 기본 5, 최대 15 |
| query | string | yes | 검색어 (표 제목·항목 낱말) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_articles ~127
현행 세법 조문을 전문검색한다. 키워드는 조사 없는 명사 위주가 정확함 (예: '이월과세 배우자', '대손세액공제'). law_name으로 특정 법령 한정 가능.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| law_name | string | – | 법령명 필터 (부분 일치, 예: '소득세법') |
| limit | integer | – | 최대 결과 수 (기본 8, 최대 20) |
| query | string | yes | 검색어 (명사 위주, 구문검색은 따옴표) |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_cases ~96
판례·조세심판원 결정례를 전문검색한다 (대법원·고등법원 판례, 조세심판원 심판례). 단일 핵심 키워드가 정확함. 키워드 히트는 현행 조문에 대한 검증된 인용이 아니다.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | 기본 5, 최대 15 |
| query | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_interpretations ~93
국세청 질의회신·법제처·행정안전부 해석례를 전문검색한다. 실무 쟁점의 과세관청 입장 확인에 사용. 키워드 히트는 현행 조문에 대한 검증된 인용이 아니다.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | 기본 5, 최대 15 |
| query | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_tax ~263
로컬 tax-ai-agent와 같은 통합 그래프 탐색. law 시작 조문에서 위임을 최대 2단계 따라 판례·예규·해석례·참조조문·통칙·부칙 적용근거·별표를 모으고 전문검색으로 보충한다. 결과마다 실제 graph_paths, DB 원문, 시행일·적용버전·미확정 상태를 반환한다. 쟁점 자료 수집의 우선 도구. next_offset으로 결과를, get_evidence로 긴 원문을 이어 읽을 것.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| as_of | string | – | 선택: YYYY-MM-DD 또는 YYYYMMDD. 조문별 당시 버전을 별도 반환하며 불명 시 현행으로 대체하지 않음. |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| offset | integer | – | – |
| result_set_id | string | – | 다음 페이지는 이전 응답의 식별자를 전달하여 검색 집합 변경을 감지 |
| search_intents | object | yes | 유형별 검색 의도. 전체 1~8개. 예: {law:[소득세법 제97조의2],case:[이월과세],ruling:[배우자 증여]} |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
search_treaties ~163
조세조약(이중과세방지협약) 조문을 전문검색한다. 비거주자·외국법인의 원천징수 제한세율, 고정사업장, 사용료·배당·이자 과세권 확인에 사용. country로 특정국 한정 가능. 본문에 개정의정서가 반영되지 않았을 수 있어 list_treaties로 이력 확인 필요.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| country | string | – | 체결국 한글명 필터 (부분 일치) |
| limit | integer | – | 기본 5, 최대 15 |
| query | string | yes | 검색어 (예: '사용료', '고정사업장', '배당 제한세율') |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the io.github.minsooparkk/korea-tax-law-mcp server?
io.github.minsooparkk/korea-tax-law-mcp is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.minsooparkk/korea-tax-law-mcp. Korean tax law graph: current statutes, 150k+ court/tribunal cases, 145k+ NTS rulings. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.taxjarvis.com/mcp).
Is the io.github.minsooparkk/korea-tax-law-mcp server safe to use?
io.github.minsooparkk/korea-tax-law-mcp scores 74 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.minsooparkk/korea-tax-law-mcp server expose?
io.github.minsooparkk/korea-tax-law-mcp exposes 14 tools: list_laws, search_articles, get_article, get_article_history, search_cases, and 9 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,695 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the io.github.minsooparkk/korea-tax-law-mcp server require authentication?
No. We connected to io.github.minsooparkk/korea-tax-law-mcp without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the io.github.minsooparkk/korea-tax-law-mcp server still maintained?
io.github.minsooparkk/korea-tax-law-mcp is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 26 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.