Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Research Methods Library

REMOTE · RESEARCH-METHODS-MCP.VERCEL.APP

Research methods for AI assistants: study design guidance, R and Python code, and citations

+4 this week 85 Trust /100

Last scanned (35 minutes ago)

Scores higher than 91% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Education and Research

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability84
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 1669 tokens (~92/item across 18 items; 6 tools + 12 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management67
  • Stability observed for 20 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1
    • New resource “toc-social_theory” functional
    • “cite” reworded the description of “ids” cosmetic
    • “get_code” reworded the description of “source” cosmetic
    • “search” reworded the description of “source” cosmetic
  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://research-methods-mcp.vercel.app/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.vercel.app CN=WR1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 31 Oct 2026 29 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 9c5f0e6a35c955e113044c86848e4cd5
SANs: *.vercel.app
CN=WR1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 7fd9e2c2d2048a0474b627a26d0868a7
CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 19 Jun 2020 28 Jan 2028 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA 77bd0d6cdb36f91aea210fc4f058d30d

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of research-methods-mcp.vercel.app. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
app. present 23684 8 Verified
vercel.app. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://research-methods-mcp.vercel.app/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://research-methods-mcp.vercel.app/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://research-methods-mcp.vercel.app/mcp
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~1,166 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
choose_method ~209

Recommend statistical, econometric, causal inference, or machine learning methods for a research question or data analysis task: which statistical test or model fits the data, how to estimate a causal or treatment effect, how to analyze an A/B test or experiment, how many observations are needed (power and sample size), how to handle panel, time-series, survey, text, or survival data, and how to build predictive or credit-scoring models. Describe the question, the data (cross-section, panel, time series, experiment), how the treatment or exposure was assigned, and the outcome. Returns candidate methods with when each applies, key assumptions, R and Python packages, and the library sections that teach them.

NameTypeReqDescription
languagestring–Only list packages for this language.
limitinteger–Number of methods (default 3).
questionstringyesThe research question and setting, e.g. "effect of a minimum wage increase that some states adopted in different years on teen employment".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

cite ~142

Format references for works in the library in APA, Chicago, MLA, Harvard, BibTeX, or RIS. Pass the ids of the sections you used to get a deduplicated reference list plus the section links, or pass source ids to cite whole works. With no ids, returns a reference for every work in the library.

NameTypeReqDescription
idsarray–Section ids, or source ids: data_analysis, causalverse, credit_score, marketing_research, ai_in_action, advanced_data_analysis, tidy_finance_vn, tidy_finance_vn_vi, mlpy, social_theory, publications.
stylestring–Citation style (default apa).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

fetch ~80

Read one section of the library by its section id. Returns the section in Markdown with its code, the section URL, and the citation of the work it comes from. Long sections come in parts; the text names the id of the next part.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesSection id, e.g. "data_analysis:sec-regression-discontinuity".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_code ~340

Get runnable code from the library for a specific statistical, econometric, causal inference, or machine learning task, in R, Python, or Julia. Suited to requests for code that carries out a named estimator, test, or modeling step; it returns code with brief context, not an explanation of the method. Results can be restricted to one language or one work. Returns code blocks with the section they come from, the packages they use, a link, and a citation.

NameTypeReqDescription
languagestring–Programming language of the code: r, python, or julia.
limitinteger–Number of sections to return code from (default 4).
sourcestring–Limit to one work: data_analysis (A Guide on Data Analysis); causalverse (causalverse: The All-in-One Causal Inference Toolkit); credit_score (Credit Scoring: Theory, Methods, and Practice); marketin…
topicstringyesThe task, e.g. "Callaway and Sant'Anna group-time ATT", "rdrobust bandwidth", "WoE binning scorecard".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_sources ~72

List the works in the library (textbooks, an R package, and research articles) with their topics, code languages, section counts, licenses, links, and how to cite each one. Suited to questions about what the library covers or which work to consult. Takes no parameters and returns one entry per work.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search ~323

Search sections of textbooks and an R package on research methods and data analysis: statistics and hypothesis testing, regression and generalized linear models, causal inference (difference-in-differences, synthetic control, regression discontinuity, instrumental variables, matching, double machine learning), econometrics, experimental design, survey methods, marketing research, credit scoring, machine learning, and AI. Returns matching sections with their ids, a link, a snippet, the code languages they contain, and a citation.

NameTypeReqDescription
languagestring–Prefer sections with code in this language.
limitinteger–Number of results (default 8).
querystringyesWhat to look for, in plain words, e.g. "staggered difference-in-differences with never-treated controls".
sourcestring–Limit to one work: data_analysis (A Guide on Data Analysis); causalverse (causalverse: The All-in-One Causal Inference Toolkit); credit_score (Credit Scoring: Theory, Methods, and Practice); marketin…

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Research Methods Library MCP server?

Research Methods Library is a hosted endpoint at https://research-methods-mcp.vercel.app/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · research-methods-mcp.vercel.app

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http mikenguyen13-research-methods-mcp 'https://research-methods-mcp.vercel.app/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Research Methods Library MCP server?

Research Methods Library is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.mikenguyen13/research-methods-mcp. Research methods for AI assistants: study design guidance, R and Python code, and citations. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://research-methods-mcp.vercel.app/mcp).

Is the Research Methods Library MCP server safe to use?

Research Methods Library scores 85 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Research Methods Library MCP server expose?

Research Methods Library exposes 6 tools: search, fetch, choose_method, get_code, cite, list_sources. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,166 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Research Methods Library MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Research Methods Library without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Research Methods Library MCP server still maintained?

Research Methods Library is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.