Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Metis RWA Research

NPM · @METISAGENT/MCP · 2 COMPONENTS

Research tokenized real-world assets on Solana: issuer controls, supply, liquidity, premiums

0 this week 81 Trust /100

Last scanned (8 hours ago)

Scores higher than 68% of npm servers

Category Crypto and Web3

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security81
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects zod 3.25.76, a direct dependency. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 30 of 93 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
Schema Quality & AI Usability88
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 1355 tokens (~96/item across 14 items; 12 tools + 2 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage98
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 95% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 12 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 14 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 0
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
  • 4 Nov 26 0
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 1 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 −1
    • Stability: pass → 0.93 functional
  • 24 Oct 26 −5
    • CVE-2023-54404 affects this package: high ▼ security
    • Known CVEs: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 23 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 21 Oct 26 0
    • Security disclosure: unverified → fail ▼ functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@metisagent/mcp@0.1.1

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem npm

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Vulnerabilities 1 finding
ID CVE Severity Vector Fix available
GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5 CVE-2023-54404 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H yes

Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →

Dependencies 93 packages
Packages resolved 93
Stale 30
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 12 exposed · ~1,162 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
check_sources ~49

Probe every data source this server depends on (Solana RPC, DEX venue data, and the price service) and report which answered and how fast. Run this when a research tool returns partial data.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_holder_concentration ~131

List the largest token accounts for an asset with each one's share of supply, the wallet that owns it, and whether it is frozen. Concentration is the practical exit-risk measure for a tokenized asset, though the top of this list is usually liquidity pools and custodians rather than end investors.

NameTypeReqDescription
assetstringyesRegistry symbol such as TSLAx, or any Solana mint address.
limitinteger–How many accounts to list. The RPC returns at most 20.
resolveOwnersboolean–Resolve the wallet behind each token account. Costs one extra RPC read.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_observation_history ~93

Read the observation history this server has stored for an asset, newest last, with the trend across premium, supply, liquidity, and concentration. History is written by observe_asset and lives on the machine running the server, not on any remote service.

NameTypeReqDescription
assetstringyesRegistry symbol such as TSLAx, or any Solana mint address.
limitinteger–How many stored points to return.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_reference_premium ~90

Compare a tokenized asset's on-chain price against the price of the security it tracks, and report the gap in basis points. A persistent premium or discount is the clearest sign that the mint and redeem path is not clearing, whether because of venue friction, market hours, or issuer limits.

NameTypeReqDescription
assetstringyesRegistry symbol such as TSLAx, or any Solana mint address.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_research ~80

Fetch a full published research object: thesis, claims with the evidence each one rests on, methodology, confidence rubric, limitations, and provenance including the content hash and the models used. Returned as JSON because the object model, not the prose, is the source of truth.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesResearch object id or slug, from list_research.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_research_status ~62

Read what the Metis research agent is doing right now: the investigation in flight and its stage, what is queued, the health of each source class, and the most recent public runtime events.

NameTypeReqDescription
eventsinteger–How many recent events to include.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_token_controls ~109

Inspect the powers an issuer holds over a token: mint authority, freeze authority, and every Token-2022 extension on the mint, each translated into what it means for someone holding the token. This is the first check to run on any real-world-asset token, because permissioned controls such as a permanent delegate, a transfer hook, or frozen-by-default accounts change what ownership is worth.

NameTypeReqDescription
assetstringyesRegistry symbol such as TSLAx, or any Solana mint address.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_token_market ~97

Read aggregated on-chain market state for a tokenized asset: pooled liquidity, 24h volume, transaction counts, and the individual pools behind those totals. Thin liquidity relative to supply is the usual reason a tokenized asset cannot be exited at its reference price.

NameTypeReqDescription
assetstringyesRegistry symbol such as TSLAx, or any Solana mint address.
poolsinteger–How many pools to list, largest first.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_token_supply ~80

Read circulating supply for a tokenized asset directly from Solana, along with decimals, the slot the read was taken at, and the token program that owns the mint. For a backed asset this is the number the issuer's reserves have to cover.

NameTypeReqDescription
assetstringyesRegistry symbol such as TSLAx, or any Solana mint address.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_research ~86

List research objects published by the Metis agent, newest first. Each entry carries its confidence band, impact, and content hash. Use get_research to pull the full evidence graph behind one of them.

NameTypeReqDescription
assetstring–Filter to one asset symbol, for example TSLAx.
categorystring–Filter by research category.
limitinteger––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_rwa_assets ~113

List the tokenized real-world assets this server knows by symbol, with their Solana mint and the security each one tracks. Every other tool also accepts a raw mint address, so this list is a starting point rather than a limit.

NameTypeReqDescription
assetTypestring–Filter by what the token tracks. Funds cover index, treasury, and commodity fund shares.
querystring–Filter by substring against symbol, name, or tracked ticker. For example "gold", "AAPL", or "bank".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

observe_asset ~172

Run one full research cycle on a tokenized asset: read supply and holder concentration from Solana, read pooled liquidity and volume from DEX venues, read the token and reference prices, then compare all of it against the observations already stored for this asset. Returns the observations, any threshold detections, cross-source conflicts, a deterministic confidence score, and a hash of every payload used. The cycle is appended to local history, so calling it repeatedly deepens the baseline that supply, liquidity, activity, and concentration detections need.

NameTypeReqDescription
assetstringyesRegistry symbol such as TSLAx, or any Solana mint address.
baselineLimitinteger–How many stored observations to use as baseline. 0 skips history entirely.
recordboolean–Append this cycle to the local observation history.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Metis RWA Research MCP server?

Metis RWA Research runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @metisagent/mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @metisagent/mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add metis-rwa-mcp -- npx -y @metisagent/mcp
Common questions

What is the Metis RWA Research MCP server?

Metis RWA Research is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.metis-rwa/mcp. Research tokenized real-world assets on Solana: issuer controls, supply, liquidity, premiums. This page covers its npm package (@metisagent/mcp).

Is the Metis RWA Research MCP server safe to use?

Metis RWA Research scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 1 known advisory against it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Metis RWA Research MCP server expose?

Metis RWA Research exposes 12 tools: list_rwa_assets, get_token_supply, get_token_controls, get_holder_concentration, get_token_market, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,162 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Metis RWA Research MCP server still maintained?

Metis RWA Research is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Metis RWA Research MCP server under?

Metis RWA Research declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.