Stabledrop escrow payments
REMOTE · API.STABLEDROP.ME · SCANNED SEP 20
Stablecoin escrow payments the buyer can dispute, with a signed receipt. Pay a wallet or an email.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security57
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- Authorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 6 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 2363 tokens (~181/item across 13 items; 6 tools + 7 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management10
- Stability observed for 3 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage77
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 19% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
- Structured output schemas are declared (83% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 8 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
How do I install the Stabledrop escrow payments MCP server?
Stabledrop escrow payments is a hosted endpoint at https://api.stabledrop.me/api/ap2/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · api.stabledrop.me
claude mcp add --transport http me-stabledrop-escrow-payments 'https://api.stabledrop.me/api/ap2/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"me-stabledrop-escrow-payments": {
"url": "https://api.stabledrop.me/api/ap2/mcp"
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"me-stabledrop-escrow-payments": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://api.stabledrop.me/api/ap2/mcp"
}
}
} [mcp_servers.me-stabledrop-escrow-payments] url = "https://api.stabledrop.me/api/ap2/mcp"
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"me-stabledrop-escrow-payments": {
"type": "remote",
"url": "https://api.stabledrop.me/api/ap2/mcp",
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add me-stabledrop-escrow-payments --url 'https://api.stabledrop.me/api/ap2/mcp' --transport streamable-http
mcp_servers:
me-stabledrop-escrow-payments:
url: "https://api.stabledrop.me/api/ap2/mcp" {
"McpServers": {
"me-stabledrop-escrow-payments": {
"Transport": "http",
"Url": "https://api.stabledrop.me/api/ap2/mcp"
}
}
} assistant mcp add me-stabledrop-escrow-payments -t streamable-http -u 'https://api.stabledrop.me/api/ap2/mcp'
{
"mcpServers": {
"me-stabledrop-escrow-payments": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://api.stabledrop.me/api/ap2/mcp"
}
}
} The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 19 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Sept 26 0
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “prepare_escrow_payment” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “settle_escrow_payment” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 135 → 181 ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 0% → 19% ▲ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- Server version: unknown → 2.0.3 functional
- Server version: 4.0.4 → unknown functional
- “prepare_escrow_payment” reworded the description of “nominal_buyer” cosmetic
- “prepare_escrow_payment” reworded the description of “seller” cosmetic
- “settle_escrow_payment” reworded the description of “nominal_buyer” cosmetic
- “settle_escrow_payment” reworded the description of “seller” cosmetic
- 17 Sept 26 63
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://api.stabledrop.me/api/ap2/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=api.stabledrop.me | CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US | 7 Sept 2026 | 6 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 601a9b62a7833736cff2ed159a82e0130b0 |
| SANs: api.stabledrop.me | ||||||
| CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) | CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US | 3 Sept 2025 | 2 Sept 2028 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115 |
| CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a |
| CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) | CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US | 13 May 2026 | 2 Sept 2032 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of api.stabledrop.me. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| me. | present | 45352 | 8 | Verified |
| stabledrop.me. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| content-security-policy | frame-ancestors * |
| x-frame-options | ALLOWALL |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://api.stabledrop.me/api/ap2/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://api.stabledrop.me/api/ap2/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://api.stabledrop.me/api/ap2/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_escrow_payment Check Escrow Payment ~37
What has happened to a settled payment, from the `status_url` on its receipt.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| status_url | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
payment_qr Payment Qr ~214
A scannable code for a payment request, so nobody retypes an address. Pass the `payment_uri` from `prepare_escrow_payment`. Returns a QR a phone wallet can scan, with the token, network, destination and amount already in it. ⚠️ A SEPARATE TOOL RATHER THAN PART OF `prepare`, because the two have different audiences. `prepare` answers a machine and has to stay parseable; an image in its result would make the structured fields something a client has to dig for. A person who needs the code asks for it. ⚠️ AND IT ENCODES THE URI, NOT THE BARE ADDRESS. A QR holding only an address leaves the amount and the token to be entered by hand, which is the part worth removing — an escrow funded with the wrong figure is not the escrow these terms derive to, and the money sits at an address nothing can deploy to.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| payment_uri | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
prepare_escrow_payment Prepare Escrow Payment ~1,022
Work out where a payment must go, before anybody signs or sends anything. `seller` and `nominal_buyer` may each be a wallet address OR AN EMAIL ADDRESS — an email is converted to the wallet that person owns, so you never need to know a wallet to use this. Returns the escrow address these terms produce, and TWO ways to fund it. Both end at the same address holding the same money; they differ only in who sends the transaction. **Transfer it yourself.** Send the tokens to the address from any wallet — a browser wallet, a hardware wallet, an exchange withdrawal. Nothing to sign for us, and no `payer` needed, because the escrow never asks who paid: it reads its own balance. Then call `settle_escrow_payment` with no signature and we create the escrow around what is there. **Or let us relay it.** Pass `payer` and this returns an EIP-3009 authorization for them to sign. We broadcast it and pay the gas, so **the payer needs no gas at all**. This is the only one an agent can complete unattended, and the only one that needs a key anywhere. Either way the address is the same, because it is a pure function of the terms. That is also what makes the relayed form safe: the payer signs `to` as part of the authorization, committing to every term at once — alter any of them afterwards and the address moves and the signature stops matching. `amount` is in the TOKEN's base units (1 USDC = 1000000), because that exact figure is one of the terms the address derives from. `expiry_timestamp` is an absolute Unix time — when the dispute window closes. `0` settles instantly with no recourse. There is no default: "instant, deliberately" and "nobody said" are different, and a caller must not discover afterwards which one they got. `nominal_buyer` is who may dispute and receives a refund. For an agentic payment this should be the PERSON, not the agent — they are the one who will later read a report and decide whether to object. **`seller` and `nominal_buyer` may each be a wallet address…
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| amount | integer | yes | – |
| description | string | – | – |
| expiry_timestamp | integer | yes | – |
| external_id | – | – | – |
| nominal_buyer | string | yes | Who may dispute and receives any refund — the PERSON, not the agent: a wallet address (0x…) OR an email address. An email is converted to that person's wallet, created for them if they have never sig… |
| payer | – | – | – |
| seller | string | yes | Who gets paid: a wallet address (0x…) OR an email address. An email is converted to the wallet that person owns, created for them if they have never signed in; the same email always gives the same wa… |
| token_symbol | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
read_published_page Read Published Page ~174
Read one of the published pages, for answering questions about how any of this works. Use it rather than guessing. What the fees are, how a dispute is decided and who decides it, what a buyer is agreeing to — all of it is written down, and none of it is safe to invent. how-it-works How an escrow payment works, start to finish faq Common questions about escrow, fees, disputes and timing arbitration-policy How a dispute is decided, by whom, and on what evidence terms-of-service The terms a buyer and seller are agreeing to privacy-policy What is collected and why plugins The WordPress and Shopify integrations home What the product is and who it is for
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
settle_escrow_payment Settle Escrow Payment ~532
Create the escrow around the money and return a signed receipt. `seller` and `nominal_buyer` may be wallet addresses OR EMAIL ADDRESSES, exactly as in `prepare_escrow_payment`; an email converts to the same wallet it did there. Works both ways, and which one runs is decided by whether you pass a signature: **Already transferred it yourself** — omit `authorization` and `signature`. We check the address holds the amount and build the escrow around what is there. If the transfer has not arrived it says so, and nothing is spent finding out. **Want us to relay it** — pass the payer's `authorization` and `signature`. We broadcast it and pay the gas, so the payer needs none. This process holds no key and signs nothing; it is handed a signature and carries it. Pass the terms exactly as they were prepared. They ARE the escrow's address, so a single altered figure moves it — and with a signature, stops matching what the payer signed. `seller` and `nominal_buyer` may be wallet addresses or email addresses, as in `prepare_escrow_payment`; an email resolves to the same wallet it did there. ⚠️ `external_id` MUST BE THE ONE `prepare_escrow_payment` RETURNED. It generates one when you leave it out, and that generated value is only knowable from its result — send a different one and this derives a different address, while the money is at the first. ⚠️ The receipt reports what the seller will actually RECEIVE in `token_amount`, with the platform fee named beside it. That is less than the amount authorised, and the two reconcile: token_amount + creator_fee = amount.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| amount | integer | yes | – |
| authorization | – | – | – |
| description | string | – | – |
| expiry_timestamp | integer | yes | – |
| external_id | string | yes | – |
| nominal_buyer | string | yes | Who may dispute and receives any refund — the PERSON, not the agent: a wallet address (0x…) OR an email address. An email is converted to that person's wallet, created for them if they have never sig… |
| seller | string | yes | Who gets paid: a wallet address (0x…) OR an email address. An email is converted to the wallet that person owns, created for them if they have never signed in; the same email always gives the same wa… |
| signature | – | – | – |
| token_symbol | string | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
verify_escrow_receipt Verify Escrow Receipt ~102
Check a receipt's signature against the key its issuer publishes. ⚠️ THE KEY IS FETCHED FROM THE RECEIPT'S OWN `iss`, NOT FROM WHOEVER HANDED IT OVER. Otherwise anything that can serve a receipt can also serve the key that vouches for it, and the signature stops meaning anything. Use this on receipts from anywhere, including ones this server did not produce.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| payment_receipt | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
What is the Stabledrop escrow payments MCP server?
Stabledrop escrow payments is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as me.stabledrop/escrow-payments. Stablecoin escrow payments the buyer can dispute, with a signed receipt. Pay a wallet or an email. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://api.stabledrop.me/api/ap2/mcp).
Is the Stabledrop escrow payments MCP server safe to use?
Stabledrop escrow payments scores 64 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Stabledrop escrow payments MCP server expose?
Stabledrop escrow payments exposes 6 tools: read_published_page, prepare_escrow_payment, settle_escrow_payment, payment_qr, check_escrow_payment, verify_escrow_receipt. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 2,081 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Stabledrop escrow payments MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Stabledrop escrow payments without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Stabledrop escrow payments MCP server still maintained?
Stabledrop escrow payments is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.