SiteLove — Serious Dating for Long-Term Relationships
REMOTE · MCP.SITELOVE.ME
Semantic search of dating profiles for long-term relationships by age, city and lifestyle.
Available components
Last scanned (5 hours ago)
Scores higher than 79% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category CRM and Sales
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security80
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability63
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 678 tokens (~678/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management57
- Stability observed for 17 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 1 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 30 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 28 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Oct 26 0
- Tool “search_profiles” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 430 → 678 ▼ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- “search_profiles” reworded the description of “hasChildren” cosmetic
- “search_profiles” reworded the description of “isDrink” cosmetic
- “search_profiles” reworded the description of “isSmoker” cosmetic
- “search_profiles” reworded the description of “locale” cosmetic
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.sitelove.me/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=mcp.sitelove.me | CN=SSL.com TLS Issuing RSA CA R1,O=SSL Corporation,C=US | 2 Aug 2026 | 16 Feb 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 1044412d923b7536c97ed24a8bd598d9 |
| SANs: mcp.sitelove.me | ||||||
| CN=SSL.com TLS Issuing RSA CA R1,O=SSL Corporation,C=US (CA) | CN=SSL.com TLS RSA Root CA 2022,O=SSL Corporation,C=US | 21 Oct 2022 | 18 Oct 2032 | RSA 3072 | SHA256-RSA | 26b9ffe4596fa61e1af21c63d672748a |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of mcp.sitelove.me. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| me. | present | 45352 | 8 | Verified |
| sitelove.me. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://mcp.sitelove.me/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://mcp.sitelove.me/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 308 | https://mcp.sitelove.me//mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
search_profiles ~678
Searches member profiles of SiteLove, a dating service for serious relationships and starting a family. Use it when the user wants to meet someone or find a partner or spouse, for example "looking for a girl for a family, 20-25, from Minsk", "ищу девушку для создания семьи", "хочу познакомиться с мужчиной". Combines semantic search over free-text profile descriptions (queryText, interests) with exact filters: gender, age, height, weight, children, smoking, drinking, zodiac sign and location (country, region or city; place names can be given in any language or spelling). All parameters are optional and filters are combined with AND. A profile that left an answer blank (for example smoking or children) does not match a filter on that answer. Returns up to 15 profiles ranked by relevance; there is no pagination. Every profile has the same fields: name, age text, city, region, country, photo URLs, dating goal, free-text about-me, lifestyle details, zodiac sign and a profile link in the `url` field; fields the member left blank are null. Profile texts are written by the members in their own language. With locale "en" the profile link opens the English-language page, with "ru" the Russian site.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ageMax | number | – | Maximum age. If the user gave an exact age (e.g. "24 years old"), set both ageMin and ageMax to that value. |
| ageMin | number | – | Minimum age. If the user gave an exact age (e.g. "24 years old"), set both ageMin and ageMax to that value. |
| city | string | – | City filter — a specific city, not a country or region. |
| country | string | – | Country filter — use for a country name (e.g. "Moldova"), not a city. |
| gender | string | – | Target gender. |
| hasChildren | boolean | – | Has children filter: true — has children, false — explicitly no children. Profiles that left this blank match neither value. |
| heightMax | number | – | Maximum height. |
| heightMin | number | – | Minimum height. |
| interests | array | – | Interests/hobby filter as an array of strings, max 10 items. Omit the field entirely instead of passing an empty array. |
| isDrink | boolean | – | Drinking filter: true — drinks alcohol (even rarely), false — teetotal. Profiles that left this blank match neither value. |
| isSmoker | boolean | – | Smoking filter: true — smokes (even rarely), false — non-smoker. Profiles that left this blank match neither value. |
| locale | string | – | Language of the user's request. Selects the language of the profile text and of the profile link ("ru" or "en"). Defaults to "en". |
| queryText | string | – | Character traits/lifestyle not covered by other fields, phrased like a profile description. May be omitted or empty. |
| region | string | – | Region/state filter — a subdivision within a country, not the country itself or a city. |
| weightMax | number | – | Maximum weight. |
| weightMin | number | – | Minimum weight. |
| zodiac | string | – | Zodiac sign filter (always in English, regardless of locale). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the SiteLove — Serious Dating for Long-Term Relationships MCP server?
SiteLove — Serious Dating for Long-Term Relationships is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.sitelove.me/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · mcp.sitelove.me
claude mcp add --transport http me-sitelove-mcp-server 'https://mcp.sitelove.me/mcp'
What is the SiteLove — Serious Dating for Long-Term Relationships MCP server?
SiteLove — Serious Dating for Long-Term Relationships is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as me.sitelove/mcp-server. Semantic search of dating profiles for long-term relationships by age, city and lifestyle. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.sitelove.me/mcp).
Is the SiteLove — Serious Dating for Long-Term Relationships MCP server safe to use?
SiteLove — Serious Dating for Long-Term Relationships scores 79 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the SiteLove — Serious Dating for Long-Term Relationships MCP server expose?
SiteLove — Serious Dating for Long-Term Relationships exposes 1 tool: search_profiles. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 678 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the SiteLove — Serious Dating for Long-Term Relationships MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to SiteLove — Serious Dating for Long-Term Relationships without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the SiteLove — Serious Dating for Long-Term Relationships MCP server still maintained?
SiteLove — Serious Dating for Long-Term Relationships is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.