Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Inkbind

REMOTE · INKBIND.ONMAX.ME

Turn a story, memoir or recipes from the chat into a printed hardcover or softcover book.

Available components

+3 this week 59 Trust /100

Last scanned (9 hours ago)

Scores higher than 43% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Documents and Files

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security46
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability42
  • 0% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Fail
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 708 tokens (~118/item across 6 items; 4 tools + 2 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management43
  • Stability observed for 13 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage93
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 79% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
  • Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1
    • Resource “book-preview” now points somewhere else: ui://inkbind/book-v1.html → ui://inkbind/book-v2.html security
    • Schema quality: 140 → 118 ▲ functional
    • New resource “book-preview-v1” functional
  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 23 Oct 26 53

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://inkbind.onmax.me/mcp/claude

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=onmax.me CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 22 Oct 2026 20 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 dfef51f80c8f6d090e3f58c5a3220f45
SANs: onmax.me, inkbind.onmax.me, *.inkbind.onmax.me
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of inkbind.onmax.me. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
me. present 45352 8 Verified
onmax.me. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://inkbind.onmax.me/mcp/claude Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://inkbind.onmax.me/mcp/claude Inconclusive 405
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~625 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
create_print_order ~106

Creates a checkout link for a book laid out with layout_book. The user opens it, enters the shipping address and pays on inkbind.onmax.me; only then is the book printed. Nothing is charged by this call.

NameTypeReqDescription
book_idstringyes–
countrystringyesISO country code of the delivery address
formatstringyes–
quantityinteger–Copies of the same book to the same address
speedstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_order_status ~54

Returns the status and tracking link of a printed book order by its order code (looks like IB-XXXXXXX).

NameTypeReqDescription
order_codestringyesOrder code, e.g. IB-7K2Q9MX

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

layout_book ~389

Lays out a story, memoir, letters or recipe collection from this conversation as a printed 8.5-inch square book and shows a page-by-page preview. Use it when the user wants something written in the chat turned into a physical book, or to change a book made earlier (pass book_id; only the fields you pass change). Pass the text exactly as written, split into sections (one per page of a picture book, or one per chapter/recipe). Never summarise or shorten it. This client cannot pass pictures from the conversation: leave `images` empty; the result has an editor link where the user uploads pictures. This only creates a draft preview; nothing is printed or charged.

NameTypeReqDescription
authorstring–Author name as it should appear on the cover, e.g. "Grandma Rosa"
book_idstring–Id of a book made earlier, to update it
countrystring–ISO country code the book will ship to, if known, to show the right price
cover_imageinteger–Index into `images` for the front cover; defaults to the first picture
dedicationstring–Dedication page text, e.g. "For Lucía, love Mum"
full_textstring–Alternative to sections: the whole text; it is split at blank lines
imagesarray–Pictures from the conversation, in the order referenced by sections
languagestring–Language the book is written in (sets the printed words like "The End"). Defaults to the conversation language.
sectionsarray–The book content in order
stylestring–picture = one picture and short text per spread (children's stories); text = flowing chapters (memoirs, recipes, letters)
subtitlestring––
titlestring–Book title

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_formats_and_prices ~76

Lists the printed book formats (hardcover, softcover), prices including shipping, and delivery times for a destination country. Use when the user asks what a printed book costs or how long delivery takes.

NameTypeReqDescription
countrystringyesISO 3166 country code the book ships to, e.g. ES, US, GB

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Inkbind MCP server?

Inkbind is a hosted endpoint at https://inkbind.onmax.me/mcp/claude, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · inkbind.onmax.me

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http me-onmax-inkbind 'https://inkbind.onmax.me/mcp/claude'
Common questions

What is the Inkbind MCP server?

Inkbind is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as me.onmax/inkbind. Turn a story, memoir or recipes from the chat into a printed hardcover or softcover book. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://inkbind.onmax.me/mcp/claude).

Is the Inkbind MCP server safe to use?

Inkbind scores 59 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Inkbind MCP server expose?

Inkbind exposes 4 tools: layout_book, list_formats_and_prices, create_print_order, get_order_status. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 625 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Inkbind MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Inkbind without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Inkbind MCP server still maintained?

Inkbind is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.