Praxis Workforce
REMOTE · JOBS.MADE-IN.AI · 2 COMPONENTS
Find people for real-world work. Search anonymous profiles; request a private conversation.
Available components
Last scanned (22 hours ago)
Scores higher than 76% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.
Category CRM and Sales
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability67
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 483 tokens (~80/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management73
- Stability observed for 22 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
- Structured output schemas are declared (33% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 31 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 29 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://jobs.made-in.ai/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=jobs.made-in.ai | CN=WR3,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 7 Oct 2026 | 5 Jan 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 1b0aaff9862093680abc39664be209c5 |
| SANs: jobs.made-in.ai | ||||||
| CN=WR3,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 7ff005a91568d63abc22861684aa4b5a |
| CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 19 Jun 2020 | 28 Jan 2028 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | 77bd0d6cdb36f91aea210fc4f058d30d |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of jobs.made-in.ai. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| ai. | present | 1814, 3799 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| made-in.ai. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://jobs.made-in.ai/api/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://jobs.made-in.ai/api/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 302 | https://jobs.made-in.ai/api/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_capabilities Read service overview ~33
Read what this human workforce pool does, task categories, lifecycle, terms, prohibited uses and limits. Call this first.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_product Read a service document ~70
Read product request conditions, completion criteria, consultation checks, related products and discovery guidance by stable productId (e.g. LAB01, TRD001). Set locale=en for English or ko for Korean. Research rank is not availability.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| locale | string | – | – |
| productId | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| agentNext | string | yes | – |
| availability | string | yes | – |
| buyer | string | yes | – |
| completionCriteria | string | yes | – |
| consultationChecks | array | yes | – |
| contentLanguage | string | yes | – |
| discoveryTerms | string | yes | – |
| family | string | yes | – |
| group | string | yes | – |
| groupName | string | yes | – |
| id | string | yes | – |
| name | string | yes | – |
| relatedProductIds | array | yes | – |
| requestConditions | array | yes | – |
| requestGuide | object | yes | – |
| research | object | yes | – |
| researchRegion | string | yes | – |
| status | string | yes | – |
| work | string | yes | – |
| workerSearch | object | yes | – |
No examples provided.
get_worker_profile View a person's profile ~36
Read one anonymous worker profile by handle (e.g. "w-7kq2xm").
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| handle | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_products List service documents ~102
Search the product catalog by Korean or English discovery terms, family or group. Paginated; use nextOffset. Includes agent tasks and traditional staffing (driving, housekeeping, construction, etc). Listings require consultation and do not confirm available workers, prices or booking.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| family | string | – | – |
| group | string | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| locale | string | – | – |
| offset | integer | – | – |
| query | string | – | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| nextOffset | – | yes | – |
| offset | integer | yes | – |
| products | array | yes | – |
| total | integer | yes | – |
| version | string | yes | – |
No examples provided.
list_skills List skills ~35
List skills, languages, categories and countries actually present in the active pool, with worker counts. Use these values in search_workers.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_workers Search people ~161
Search anonymous worker profiles worldwide by skills, languages, category, remote/on-site location, verification and budget. Results are ranked with explainable match reasons. Use skillsMatch=all for strict skill requirements, or rank for partial matches. weeklyWindow requires stated local weekly hours covering the whole window. Searching does not reserve anyone.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| budget | object | – | – |
| category | string | – | – |
| city | string | – | – |
| countryCode | string | – | – |
| estimatedMinutes | integer | – | – |
| languages | array | – | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| minVerification | string | – | – |
| mode | string | – | – |
| skills | array | – | – |
| skillsMatch | string | – | – |
| weeklyWindow | object | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Praxis Workforce MCP server?
Praxis Workforce is a hosted endpoint at https://jobs.made-in.ai/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · jobs.made-in.ai
claude mcp add --transport http max7819-manpower 'https://jobs.made-in.ai/api/mcp'
What is the Praxis Workforce MCP server?
Praxis Workforce is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.max7819/manpower. Find people for real-world work. Search anonymous profiles; request a private conversation. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://jobs.made-in.ai/api/mcp).
Is the Praxis Workforce MCP server safe to use?
Praxis Workforce scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Praxis Workforce MCP server expose?
Praxis Workforce exposes 6 tools: get_capabilities, search_workers, get_worker_profile, list_skills, list_products, get_product. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 437 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Praxis Workforce MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Praxis Workforce without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Praxis Workforce MCP server still maintained?
Praxis Workforce is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.