UnClick
NPM · @UNCLICK/MCP-SERVER
AI agent tool marketplace. 60+ tools for social, e-commerce, accounting, and messaging.
Available components
Last scanned (22 hours ago)
Scores higher than 51% of npm servers
Category Developer Tools
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security81
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects nodemailer 8.0.11, a direct dependency. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- 37 of 121 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency23
- Repository check failed: the declared repository URL redirects; it must resolve directly. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 5 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability81
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 361 tokens (~90/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 0
- CVE-2026-121426 affects this package: high ▼ security
- CVE-2026-121424 affects this package: high ▼ security
- CVE-2026-121425 affects this package: high ▼ security
- GHSA-8c8m-p3m8-cjg8 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- GHSA-85x2-q946-cp5h no longer affects this package ▲ security
- GHSA-m943-m63m-w62w no longer affects this package ▲ security
- 2 Nov 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 1 Nov 26 0
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 28 Oct 26 0
- CVE-2026-110869 affects this package: high ▼ security
- CVE-2026-110872 affects this package: high ▼ security
- CVE-2026-110870 affects this package: high ▼ security
- Security disclosure: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- 27 Oct 26 0
- Security disclosure: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- 26 Oct 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 25 Oct 26 0
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 24 Oct 26 0
- GHSA-85x2-q946-cp5h affects this package: high ▼ security
- GHSA-m943-m63m-w62w affects this package: high ▼ security
- GHSA-8c8m-p3m8-cjg8 affects this package: high ▼ security
- CVE-2023-54404 affects this package: high ▼ security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@unclick/mcp-server@0.2.3
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Vulnerabilities 18 findings
| ID | CVE | Severity | Vector | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-8cw4-87c7-c6xx | CVE-2026-85063 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-2x7j-588g-ccc2 | CVE-2026-92596 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-39m8-27wv-hr27 | CVE-2026-110871 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-4ffr-jq9g-5ffx | CVE-2026-110869 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-4g23-2xm8-66gc | CVE-2026-110872 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-6vj9-mwq6-2f5v | CVE-2026-100701 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-85x2-q946-cp5h | CVE-2026-121426 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-8c8m-p3m8-cjg8 | CVE-2026-121424 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-8m3c-c648-2xjj | CVE-2026-92595 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-8vvx-rff5-p5rq | CVE-2026-100702 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-cc9r-2j5m-2m83 | CVE-2026-92597 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-g73g-hqqh-jr95 | CVE-2026-110870 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-m943-m63m-w62w | CVE-2026-121425 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-p6gq-j5cr-w38f | CVE-2026-82659 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-v53p-9fqp-m79j | CVE-2026-100700 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-wmmp-3585-3rmp | CVE-2026-92598 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-c2qf-rxjj-qqgw | CVE-2022-25883 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5 | CVE-2023-54404 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →
Dependencies 121 packages
| Packages resolved | 121 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 37 |
| No linked repository | 1 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
unclick_browse ~48
Browse all available UnClick tools, optionally filtered by category. Returns a list of tools with their slugs and descriptions.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | Optional: filter to a specific category |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
unclick_call ~116
Call any UnClick tool endpoint. Specify the endpoint ID and parameters. Use unclick_search or unclick_tool_info to discover endpoint IDs and required params. Example: endpoint_id='image.resize', params={image: '<base64>', width: 800, height: 600}
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| endpoint_id | string | yes | Endpoint identifier, e.g. 'image.resize', 'hash.compute', 'csv.parse', 'cron.next' |
| params | object | yes | Parameters for the endpoint. Use unclick_tool_info to see required params. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
unclick_search ~79
Search the UnClick tool marketplace by keyword or description. Use this to discover which tools are available for a task. Example: 'I need to resize an image' → returns the image tool with its endpoints.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | string | – | Optional: filter by category |
| query | string | yes | Search term — describe what you want to do |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
unclick_tool_info ~118
Get detailed information about a specific UnClick tool including all its endpoints, required parameters, and response shapes. Use this after unclick_search to understand exactly how to call a tool.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| slug | string | yes | Tool slug, e.g. 'image', 'hash', 'csv', 'cron'. Available slugs: transform, encode, hash, regex, markdown, diff, json, csv, validate, image, qr, color, timestamp, cron, ip, shorten, uuid, random, rep… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the UnClick MCP server?
UnClick runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @unclick/mcp-server. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · @unclick/mcp-server
claude mcp add malamutemayhem-unclick-mcp-server -- npx -y @unclick/mcp-server
What is the UnClick MCP server?
UnClick is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.malamutemayhem/unclick-mcp-server. AI agent tool marketplace. 60+ tools for social, e-commerce, accounting, and messaging. This page covers its npm package (@unclick/mcp-server).
Is the UnClick MCP server safe to use?
UnClick scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 18 known advisories against it as of 4 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the UnClick MCP server expose?
UnClick exposes 4 tools: unclick_search, unclick_browse, unclick_tool_info, unclick_call. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 361 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the UnClick MCP server still maintained?
UnClick is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the UnClick MCP server under?
UnClick declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.