io.github.m2ai-mcp-servers/mcp-christensen
NPM · MCP-CHRISTENSEN · SCANNED AUG 3
Clayton Christensen persona agent for strategic advisory using disruption theory
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score →
Supply Chain Security87
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- Only part of the dependency tree could be resolved (96 of 100), so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree.Partial
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- Only part of the dependency tree could be resolved (96 of 100), so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 195 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability68
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 454 tokens (~151/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management23
- Stability observed for 7 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage93
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 80% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Add this component to your MCP client. Where a client-specific snippet is available, pick your client below and copy it straight into your config; otherwise use the connection detail shown.
npm · mcp-christensen
claude mcp add m2ai-mcp-servers-mcp-christensen -- npx -y mcp-christensen
codex mcp add m2ai-mcp-servers-mcp-christensen -- npx -y mcp-christensen
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"m2ai-mcp-servers-mcp-christensen": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"mcp-christensen"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add m2ai-mcp-servers-mcp-christensen --command npx --arg -y --arg mcp-christensen
mcp_servers:
m2ai-mcp-servers-mcp-christensen:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "mcp-christensen"] {
"mcpServers": {
"m2ai-mcp-servers-mcp-christensen": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"mcp-christensen"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 3 Aug 26 +3
- Stability: unverified → 0.23 ▲ functional
- 2 Aug 26 +12
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 1 Aug 26 +46
- Provenance: unverified → fail ▼ security
- Install scripts: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Known CVEs: unverified → partial ▲ security
- Stability: Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window). security
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- License: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- Dependency health: unverified → partial ▲ functional
- Maintenance: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- Schema quality: unverified → good ▲ functional
- Licence: MIT functional
- 31 Jul 26 −21
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 30 Jul 26 −18
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 28 Jul 26 +20
- Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
- First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
- First check of Schema quality: fail functional
- First check of Tool coverage: 80 functional
- First check of Schema quality: fail functional
- 27 Jul 26 24
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 3 Aug 2026 · Analysed npm/[email protected]
Provenance none
Ecosystem: npm · Outcome: none
Dependencies 96 packages
96 packages in the resolved dependency tree · 96 deprecated · 29 stale.
The dependency tree was only partially resolved, so these counts may be incomplete.
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability.
analyze_decision ~176
Analyze a business decision using Clayton Christensen's frameworks. Applies Jobs-to-Be-Done, Disruption Theory, Capabilities-Processes-Priorities, and Resource Dependence analysis to provide strategic insight. Returns a structured analysis with: - Framework-specific insights - Relevant case study patterns - Theory-based predictions (with appropriate uncertainty) - Key questions for deeper understanding Use this when facing strategic decisions about: - Market entry or expansion - Product development priorities - Competitive positioning - Organizational capability assessment - Innovation strategy
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| context | string | — | Additional context about the organization, market, or situation |
| decision | string | yes | The business decision or situation to analyze |
| focusAreas | array | — | Specific frameworks to focus on (default: all) |
| market | object | — | — |
| organization | object | — | — |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
case_study ~154
Find and explore Christensen's canonical case studies. These cases illustrate key patterns from disruption theory: - Steel Mini-Mills: Low-end disruption - Disk Drives: New-market disruption - Milkshake: Jobs-to-be-done - Honda Motorcycles: Emergent strategy - Intel: Capability migration Use this to: - Find patterns matching your current situation - Deep-dive into a specific case study - Learn the lessons and common misapplications - Get diagnostic questions for your situation
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| caseName | string | — | Request a specific case study by name |
| observedSignals | array | — | Specific patterns or signals observed |
| situation | string | yes | Description of the current situation to match against case studies |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_framework ~124
Get information about Christensen's strategic frameworks. Available frameworks: - jtbd: Jobs-to-Be-Done theory - disruption: Disruption Theory - cpp: Capabilities-Processes-Priorities - resource-dependence: Resource Dependence Theory - all: Overview of all frameworks Detail levels: - summary: Core concepts and when to use - full: Complete framework with questions and examples - questions-only: Just the diagnostic questions
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| detail | string | — | Level of detail (default: summary) |
| framework | string | yes | Which framework to retrieve |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.