Atviri teisės aktai – Lithuanian law
REMOTE · ATVIRI-TEISES-AKTAI.LT
Lithuanian laws article by article, with whether each applies today, past versions and search
Available components
Last scanned (11 hours ago)
Scores higher than 58% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Education and Research
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security71
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability74
- 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1345 tokens (~168/item across 8 items; 8 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management37
- Stability observed for 11 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage89
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 67% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 8 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 9 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 5 Nov 26 0
- Tool “get_act_contents” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “search_law” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- “get_article” reworded the description of “article” cosmetic
- 4 Nov 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
- “search_law” reworded the description of “query” cosmetic
1 cosmetic change on this day. Switch on “Show cosmetic changes” to see it.
- 31 Oct 26 0
- “search_law” reworded the description of “query” cosmetic
1 cosmetic change on this day. Switch on “Show cosmetic changes” to see it.
- 30 Oct 26 +4
- The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
- Tool “search_law” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: 140 → 155 ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 53% → 67% ▲ functional
- The server now declares the “prompts” capability functional
- First check of Schema quality: 100 functional
- New prompt “research_lithuanian_law” functional
- New tool “get_articles” functional
- New tool “related” functional
- “search_law” reworded the description of “query” cosmetic
- 29 Oct 26 0
- Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 45% → 53% ▲ functional
- New tool “find_definition” functional
- “get_article” added an optional parameter “part” cosmetic
- “get_article” reworded the description of “act” cosmetic
- “get_article” reworded the description of “article” cosmetic
- 27 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 26 Oct 26 0
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://atviri-teises-aktai.lt/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=atviri-teises-aktai.lt | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 20 Oct 2026 | 18 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 4521ee6f968f095f0eb59bc98bae2fff |
| SANs: atviri-teises-aktai.lt | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of atviri-teises-aktai.lt. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| lt. | present | 1765 | 13 | Verified |
| atviri-teises-aktai.lt. | present | 2371 | 13 | Verified |
| atviri-teises-aktai.lt. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://atviri-teises-aktai.lt/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://atviri-teises-aktai.lt/mcp | Inconclusive | 405 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
find_definition ~242
Where a term is legally defined, in every act on the site: the term, its alias ("toliau – …"), the definition text, the act and article/part with a link, and the article's status today. Inflection-tolerant ("vartotojo objektas" = "vartotojo objektą"). The same word often means different things in different acts ("vartotojas" in EĮ, EEĮ, GDĮ, VTAĮ): all are returned, plus narrower terms ending in it ("elektros energijos vartotojas").
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| act | string | – | Optional: the meaning in this act (key, abbreviation, TAR code or name). If the act does not define the term itself but says its terms are understood as defined in other acts ("sąvokos suprantamos ta… |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| term | string | yes | A word or phrase: "vartotojo objektas", "bešeimininkis daiktas" |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_act_contents ~66
The articles of one act in order (number, title, chapter, status), paged, and its annexes (read one with get_article: "6 priedas").
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| act | string | yes | – |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| offset | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_article ~325
The text of one article (or point) as published by the Seimas Chancellery, unchanged, with its status today (Galioja šiandien / Įsigalios D / Gali būti pasenęs / Neaišku, ar galioja / Neteko galios), until when that label is certain, amending acts, the future wording if adopted, defined terms used, a citation line and the official e-tar.lt link.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| act | string | yes | Act key, abbreviation, TAR code or name: "DK", "CK", "KET", "2016-23709", "darbo kodeksas" |
| article | string | yes | Article or point number: "52", "21¹" or "21-1", "6.228-1", "3.2" (also accepted as `n`); an annex: "6 priedas", "V priedas" (whether an annex is in force today is not checked: its status says so) |
| date | string | – | Optional YYYY-MM-DD: the text in force on that date (the Chancellery's official consolidation for it, since 2020, where the open data hold one); without it, today's text |
| part | string | – | Optional: one part of the article, by number or anchor ("107" or "d107"; a rule's sub-point "8.12" or "p8.12"): only that part's text (and its future wording) instead of the whole article |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_articles ~128
Several articles (or points, or parts) in one call, up to 20: each as get_article returns it. Use it to read everything a search or `related` found, instead of one call per article.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| date | string | – | Optional YYYY-MM-DD for all of them (as get_article's `date`) |
| refs | array | yes | References: "DK 52", "EEĮ 2 str. 15 d." (one part), "KET 3.2", "CK 6.228¹", or {act, article, part} |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_acts ~32
Every act on the site: its key, citation form, name, number of articles and how many apply today.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
related ~154
References both ways for an article (or point, part, or a whole act): the articles it cites, and the articles of other acts, of the same act and the energy regulator's (VERT) decisions that cite it. E.g. which rules and decisions apply an article of a law. Each item has its status and URL; read them with get_articles.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| act | string | yes | Act key, abbreviation, TAR code or name |
| article | string | – | Article or point number; omit for references to the act as a whole |
| limit | integer | – | Per list |
| part | string | – | Optional: one part ("2" or "d2"; a sub-point "p8.12") |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_law ~231
Find articles of Lithuanian codes, laws and Government-approved rules (unofficial mirror of e-tar.lt). Use a reference ("DK 52", "CK 6.228¹", "KET 52") or Lithuanian words ("kasmetinės atostogos"). Returns articles with their URL, whether their text applies today, and for the first 10 the part where the words are (`part`, `snippet`). Annexes are searched too (label "priedas-6"): lists, forms and tables that the articles refer to.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| act | string | – | Optional: limit to one act (key, abbreviation or name, e.g. "DK") |
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | A reference or Lithuanian words (4+ letters each; all must occur; when fewer than 3 articles have them all, then also those with all but one, each naming the word it lacks in `lacks_word`). Up to 3 a… |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
upcoming_changes ~41
Articles whose text or status changes in the next days (adopted amendments with a date).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| act | string | – | – |
| days | integer | – | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Atviri teisės aktai – Lithuanian law MCP server?
Atviri teisės aktai – Lithuanian law is a hosted endpoint at https://atviri-teises-aktai.lt/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · atviri-teises-aktai.lt
claude mcp add --transport http lt-atviri-teises-aktai-lithuanian-law 'https://atviri-teises-aktai.lt/mcp'
What is the Atviri teisės aktai – Lithuanian law MCP server?
Atviri teisės aktai – Lithuanian law is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as lt.atviri-teises-aktai/lithuanian-law. Lithuanian laws article by article, with whether each applies today, past versions and search. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://atviri-teises-aktai.lt/mcp).
Is the Atviri teisės aktai – Lithuanian law MCP server safe to use?
Atviri teisės aktai – Lithuanian law scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Atviri teisės aktai – Lithuanian law MCP server expose?
Atviri teisės aktai – Lithuanian law exposes 8 tools: search_law, get_article, find_definition, get_articles, related, and 3 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,219 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Atviri teisės aktai – Lithuanian law MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Atviri teisės aktai – Lithuanian law without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Atviri teisės aktai – Lithuanian law MCP server still maintained?
Atviri teisės aktai – Lithuanian law is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.