Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

BrainFlow

REMOTE · ALPICHACK-3C740D01.ALPIC.LIVE

AI-powered ticket triage and workflow automation

0 this week 33 Trust /100

Last scanned (4 hours ago)

Scores higher than 16% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Project Management

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security83
Transport & Reachability0
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read it. See how to fix → Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read its tools.Unverified
Tool Safety0
  • Tool safety blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read its tools.Unverified
Capabilities0
  • Capabilities blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read them. See how to fix → Unverified

Unverified: 6 categories

Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm. Claim this server and supply a read-only token to verify it and lift the score.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 26 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Aug 26 0
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → behind authorisation ▼ security
    • Transport: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Stability: 0.97 → unverified ▼ security
    • Authorization: partial → fail ▼ security
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • Schema quality: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
  • 24 Aug 26 0
    • Resource “setup” now points somewhere else: ui://views/apps-sdk/setup.html?v=050a9d25 → ui://views/ext-apps/setup.html?v=050a9d25 security
    • Resource “triage” now points somewhere else: ui://views/apps-sdk/triage.html?v=2bcb0532 → ui://views/ext-apps/triage.html?v=2bcb0532 security
  • 23 Aug 26 0
    • Resource “setup” now points somewhere else: ui://views/apps-sdk/setup.html?v=050a9d25 → ui://views/ext-apps/setup.html?v=050a9d25 security
    • Resource “triage” now points somewhere else: ui://views/apps-sdk/triage.html?v=2bcb0532 → ui://views/ext-apps/triage.html?v=2bcb0532 security
  • 22 Aug 26 0
    • Resource “setup” now points somewhere else: ui://views/apps-sdk/setup.html?v=050a9d25 → ui://views/ext-apps/setup.html?v=050a9d25 security
    • Resource “triage” now points somewhere else: ui://views/apps-sdk/triage.html?v=2bcb0532 → ui://views/ext-apps/triage.html?v=2bcb0532 security
  • 21 Aug 26 0
    • Resource “setup” now points somewhere else: ui://views/apps-sdk/setup.html?v=050a9d25 → ui://views/ext-apps/setup.html?v=050a9d25 security
    • Resource “triage” now points somewhere else: ui://views/apps-sdk/triage.html?v=2bcb0532 → ui://views/ext-apps/triage.html?v=2bcb0532 security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://alpichack-3c740d01.alpic.live

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=*.alpic.live CN=Amazon RSA 2048 M04,O=Amazon,C=US 23 Sept 2026 8 Apr 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 41ca0c3068063f7c713f936a81919aa
SANs: *.alpic.live
CN=Amazon RSA 2048 M04,O=Amazon,C=US (CA) CN=Amazon Root CA 1,O=Amazon,C=US 23 Aug 2022 23 Aug 2030 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 773124f2a952e3ed18a58bdb85d1bc0ce5f27
CN=Amazon Root CA 1,O=Amazon,C=US (CA) CN=Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2,O=Starfield Technologies\, Inc.,L=Scottsdale,ST=Arizona,C=US 25 May 2015 31 Dec 2037 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 67f944a2a27cdf3fac2ae2b01f908eeb9c4c6

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of alpichack-3c740d01.alpic.live. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
live. present 4724, 36322 8, 8 Verified
alpic.live. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Challenged, unverified

The endpoint asked for a token, but we could not retrieve and validate the RFC 9728 metadata that tells a client how to obtain one.

Result Challenged, unverified
Enforced On connection
HTTP status 403

Protected resource metadata

Retrieved No
Problem no_resource_metadata

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 3 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://alpichack-3c740d01.alpic.live Auth required 403
sse https://alpichack-3c740d01.alpic.live Auth required 403
http (plaintext) http://alpichack-3c740d01.alpic.live HTTPS enforced 301 https://alpichack-3c740d01.alpic.live/
MCP tools · 12 exposed · ~795 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
connect-provider ~29

Internal — initiate an OAuth connection flow for a provider.

NameTypeReqDescription
providerstringyesProvider to connect
NameTypeReqDescription
redirectUrlstringyesOAuth authorization URL to redirect the user to

No examples provided.

fetch-analysis ~42

Fetch LLM analysis (findings + solutions) for a ticket.

NameTypeReqDescription
ticketIdstringyesThe ticket source_id, e.g. KAN-1
NameTypeReqDescription
findingsarrayyes–
solutionsarrayyes–

No examples provided.

get-agent-config ~40

Internal — load saved agent.md content for a role.

NameTypeReqDescription
rolestringyesRole identifier, e.g. 'engineer' or 'pm'
NameTypeReqDescription
contentstringyesThe saved agent.md content, or empty string if none
rolestringyes–

No examples provided.

get-connection-status ~20

Internal — get current connection status for all providers.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
connectionsobjectyesConnection status for each supported provider

No examples provided.

hitl-execute ~221

Internal — approve a candidate solution and create issues on the target platform (Jira stories or GitHub issues).

NameTypeReqDescription
jira_project_keystring–Jira project key, e.g. KAN (Jira only)
notesstring–PM/engineer notes
ownerstring–GitHub repo owner (required when platform=github)
platformstringyesTarget platform. 'jira' for PM creating Jira stories, 'github' for engineer creating GitHub issues.
repostring–GitHub repo name (required when platform=github)
solution_effortstring–Effort estimate (Jira only)
solution_idstringyesThe chosen solution id
solution_riskstring–Risk level (Jira only)
solution_summarystring–Summary of the chosen solution
solution_titlestring–Title of the chosen solution
sourcestringyesSource system the ticket came from
ticket_idstringyesThe ticket identifier
NameTypeReqDescription
createdIssuesarray––
creationErrorsarray––
selectedSolutionobjectyes–

No examples provided.

hitl-reject ~83

Internal — reject a BrainFlow HITL item with a rework reason.

NameTypeReqDescription
reasonstringyesShort explanation of why all candidate solutions were rejected and what needs to change
sourcestringyesThe source system the ticket came from
ticket_idstringyesThe ticket identifier, e.g. GH-123 or sc-1842
NameTypeReqDescription
rejectedbooleanyesTrue when the rejection was persisted successfully
ticketIdstringyes–

No examples provided.

list-github-repos ~23

Internal — list the user's GitHub repositories for repo selection.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
reposarrayyesUser's GitHub repositories

No examples provided.

list-jira-projects ~22

Internal — list the user's Jira projects for project selection.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
projectsarrayyesUser's Jira projects

No examples provided.

open-ticket ~81

Open a specific ticket to see its details, MCP findings, and candidate solutions.

NameTypeReqDescription
rolestring–User role — determines Jira tickets (PM) or GitHub issues (engineer)
ticketIdstringyesThe ticket ID to open, e.g. sc-1842 or GH-123. Use the id field from triage results.
NameTypeReqDescription
rolestring–User role
ticketobjectyes–

No examples provided.

save-agent-config ~52

Internal — save agent.md content for a role.

NameTypeReqDescription
contentstringyesThe agent.md content to save
rolestringyesRole identifier, e.g. 'engineer' or 'pm'
NameTypeReqDescription
rolestringyes–
savedbooleanyes–

No examples provided.

setup ~59

Open the BrainFlow onboarding wizard. Use this when the user wants to configure BrainFlow, connect a task system (GitHub, Jira, or Slack), or change their role. Guides the user through role selection and OAuth connection in a step-by-step widget.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
stepstringyesThe initial wizard step to display

No examples provided.

triage ~123

Show open tickets from connected task systems with triage classification. When the user asks for tickets from a specific system (e.g. 'show Jira tickets' or 'GitHub issues'), pass the matching source in the sources array.

NameTypeReqDescription
jira_projectstring–Jira project/space key to filter tickets (e.g. KAN). Only used when sources includes jira.
sourcesarray–Filter tickets to specific sources. Pass ['jira'] for Jira only, ['github'] for GitHub only, etc. Omit to show tickets from all connected sources.
NameTypeReqDescription
loadingboolean–True when the view is fetching fresh data in background
ticketsarrayyesClassified open tickets

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the BrainFlow MCP server?

BrainFlow is a hosted endpoint at https://alpichack-3c740d01.alpic.live/, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · alpichack-3c740d01.alpic.live

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http live-alpic-alpichack-3c740d01-alpichack 'https://alpichack-3c740d01.alpic.live/'
Common questions

What is the BrainFlow MCP server?

BrainFlow is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as live.alpic.alpichack-3c740d01/alpichack. AI-powered ticket triage and workflow automation. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://alpichack-3c740d01.alpic.live).

Is the BrainFlow MCP server safe to use?

BrainFlow scores 33 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the BrainFlow MCP server expose?

BrainFlow exposes 12 tools: setup, triage, open-ticket, get-agent-config, save-agent-config, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 795 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the BrainFlow MCP server require authentication?

Yes. BrainFlow asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.

Is the BrainFlow MCP server still maintained?

BrainFlow is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.