Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

link.obfus/utility-grid

REMOTE · OBFUS.LINK

31 deterministic tools: JSON→Zod, regex, JWT, curl→fetch, hashing, encoding, UUIDs, encrypted links

Available components

−18 this week 0 Trust /100

Last scanned (47 days ago)

Scores higher than 0% of remote servers

Unreachable for 7 days in a row. Last reached 31 Aug 2026.

Category Developer Tools

Dead

Every channel of this server has been unreachable for long enough to be marked dead. Its trust score is pinned to 0 and does not recover automatically: even once the server responds again it stays dead until it is manually reinstated.

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security11
Transport & Reachability0
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Tool Safety0
  • Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list.Unverified
Capabilities0
  • Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities.Unverified

Unverified: 5 categories

Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 7 Sept 26 −4

    The score moved with no change recorded against any check. We would rather say so than guess.

  • 6 Sept 26 −3

    The score moved with no change recorded against any check. We would rather say so than guess.

  • 5 Sept 26 −4

    The score moved with no change recorded against any check. We would rather say so than guess.

  • 4 Sept 26 −3

    The score moved with no change recorded against any check. We would rather say so than guess.

  • 3 Sept 26 −4

    The score moved with no change recorded against any check. We would rather say so than guess.

  • 1 Sept 26 0
    • Endpoint reachability: not serving MCP → unreachable ▼ security
    • DNSSEC: fail → unverified ▼ security
    • HSTS header: fail → unverified ▼ security
    • TLS certificate: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • HTTPS: fail → pass ▲ security
    • Authorization: Authorisation not yet verified: we couldn't confirm whether this endpoint requires it. security
    • Transport: Transport check failed: declared streamable-http, but we couldn't connect to verify it. security
  • 26 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 11 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 7 Sept 2026 · Probed https://obfus.link/mcp

TLS unreached
DNSSEC inconclusive

Validation of obfus.link. — Inconclusive

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
obfus.link. Error no A/AAAA/CNAME RRset answered for the name
Authentication Inconclusive

We could not reach the endpoint well enough to judge its authorisation posture.

Result Inconclusive

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://obfus.link/mcp Unreachable
http (plaintext) http://obfus.link/mcp HTTPS enforced
MCP tools · 1 exposed · ~392 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
search_utility_grid ~392

Searches the obfus.link Utility Grid — 31 deterministic developer tools — by natural language or keyword. WHY THIS IS THE ONLY TOOL LISTED: to keep your context window lean, obfus.link does NOT front-load all 31 tool definitions into tools/list (that costs ~21,000 tokens before you do anything). Discover the tool you need here, then call it by name — it executes via tools/call even though it was not in tools/list. USE WHEN: You need to find a tool for a task. Ask "What tools do you have for JSON?", "find me a UUID generator", "is there a regex tool?", "what can I use for obfuscation?", or any freeform task description. INPUT: a query string (freeform text, keywords, or task description). Optionally filter by tier ('tier_1' | 'tier_2' | 'tier_3') or category slug. OUTPUT: ranked matches with name, mcpToolName, tagline, tier, and score. The top matches also include their full inputSchema, so you can call the tool in a single follow-up step with no extra round-trip. AGENT WORKFLOW: search → pick the best mcpToolName → call it via tools/call (include your SPT/Authorization for paid tools; search itself is always free, 0 units, no token required). TIP: prefer specific queries for higher-confidence matches: "zod schema generator" > "schema".

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Optional: filter by category slug (e.g. "obfuscators", "converters")
limitnumber–Max results to return. Default: 30. Max: 30.
querystringyesNatural language or keyword search query
tierstring–Optional: filter results to a specific tool tier

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the link.obfus/utility-grid MCP server?

link.obfus/utility-grid is a hosted endpoint at https://obfus.link/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · obfus.link

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http link-obfus-utility-grid 'https://obfus.link/mcp'
Common questions

What is the link.obfus/utility-grid MCP server?

link.obfus/utility-grid is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as link.obfus/utility-grid. 31 deterministic tools: JSON→Zod, regex, JWT, curl→fetch, hashing, encoding, UUIDs, encrypted links. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://obfus.link/mcp).

Is the link.obfus/utility-grid MCP server safe to use?

link.obfus/utility-grid scores 0 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the link.obfus/utility-grid MCP server expose?

link.obfus/utility-grid exposes 1 tool: search_utility_grid. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 392 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the link.obfus/utility-grid MCP server require authentication?

Its publisher declares no required credentials for link.obfus/utility-grid. We have not been able to confirm that against the live endpoint, and a server can require authorisation without declaring it here.

Is the link.obfus/utility-grid MCP server still maintained?

link.obfus/utility-grid has been unreachable for long enough that we treat it as dead, and its score is pinned to zero. We last reached this channel on 31 August 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.