Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

BestAsiaHotels

REMOTE · MCP.BESTASIAHOTELS.COM

Read-only Asian hotel search and guides with canonical sources and non-live rates.

+3 this week 71 Trust /100

Last scanned (23 hours ago)

Scores higher than 57% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category E-commerce

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability59
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 277 tokens (~46/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management70
  • Stability observed for 21 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 43 to 47. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 13 days of observed history at the previous scan, 14 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 37 to 40. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 11 days of observed history at the previous scan, 12 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 19 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.bestasiahotels.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=bestasiahotels.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 14 Oct 2026 12 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 76878d26188e21190ef3c0d84f5c0e9c
SANs: bestasiahotels.com, mcp.bestasiahotels.com, *.mcp.bestasiahotels.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.bestasiahotels.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
bestasiahotels.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
x-content-type-options nosniff

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.bestasiahotels.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.bestasiahotels.com/mcp Inconclusive 403
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~242 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
compare_hotels ~38

Compare 2–5 known hotel IDs using sourced published fields. No inferred winner or comparable live prices.

NameTypeReqDescription
hotel_idsarrayyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

fetch ~33

Fetch a known document ID or exact canonical URL returned by search. No arbitrary URLs are fetched.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

find_hotels ~60

Find published hotel records by exact destination name/slug, optional text and category. No live availability or price filters.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring––
destinationstring––
limitinteger––
querystring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_booking_links ~35

Return exact published affiliate and official URLs with disclosure. Does not visit links or book rooms.

NameTypeReqDescription
hotel_idstringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_destination_guide ~41

Find published guide documents for a known destination. Fetch returned IDs for full source text.

NameTypeReqDescription
destinationstringyes–
limitinteger––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search ~35

Search published English hotel guides. Returns document IDs and canonical source URLs.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger––
querystringyes–

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the BestAsiaHotels MCP server?

BestAsiaHotels is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.bestasiahotels.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.bestasiahotels.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http lightonint-bestasiahotels 'https://mcp.bestasiahotels.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the BestAsiaHotels MCP server?

BestAsiaHotels is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.LightoninT/bestasiahotels. Read-only Asian hotel search and guides with canonical sources and non-live rates. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.bestasiahotels.com/mcp).

Is the BestAsiaHotels MCP server safe to use?

BestAsiaHotels scores 71 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the BestAsiaHotels MCP server expose?

BestAsiaHotels exposes 6 tools: search, fetch, find_hotels, compare_hotels, get_destination_guide, get_booking_links. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 242 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the BestAsiaHotels MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to BestAsiaHotels without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the BestAsiaHotels MCP server still maintained?

BestAsiaHotels is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.