Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

loremfile

NPM · LOREMFILE · 2 COMPONENTS

CC0 sample files and test fixtures: find one, get its URL and SHA-256, check a copy on disk.

+3 this week 92 Trust /100

Last scanned (1 hour ago)

Scores higher than 95% of npm servers

Category Documents and Files

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency100
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to kumarprabhashanand/loremfile). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 28 days ago).Pass
  • Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability75
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 360 tokens (~120/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management73
  • Stability observed for 22 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Oct 26 +3
    • Stability: unverified → 0.27 ▲ functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/loremfile@0.2.0

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem npm
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo kumarprabhashanand/loremfile
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/kumarprabhashanand/loremfile/.github/workflows/publish-npm.yml@refs/tags/npm-v0.2.0
Rekor log index 3135184392
Predicate type SLSA build provenance https://slsa.dev/provenance/v1
Subject digest sha512:c9497b855e1cdbef9b9882b14af06041ffa2c5d5dbe5ce2e82faf465bdbb816179d1193d82609b162a958c5b910709e7973d05149dfbe9fff39237241

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 0 packages
Packages resolved 0
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~300 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
describe_fixture ~64

The published manifest entry for one fixture: its URL, MIME type, size, SHA-256, tags, description and measured properties. Metadata only; fetch the URL for the file.

NameTypeReqDescription
pathstringyesA fixture path, e.g. "pdf/minimal.pdf".
NameTypeReqDescription
added_instring|nullyes–
bytesintegeryes–
catalog_versionstringyes–
descriptionstringyes–
formatstringyes–
mimestringyes–
pathstringyes–
propsobject|nullyes–
sha256stringyes–
size_classstring|nullyes–
tagsarrayyes–
urlstringyes–

No examples provided.

list_fixtures ~148

One page of the published sample files, filtered by format, tag and size. Each comes with its URL and a description of what it is for. `total` counts every match and `next_offset` fetches the next page; it is null on the last.

NameTypeReqDescription
format––Formats to include, any of, e.g. ["pdf", "png"].
limitinteger–Fixtures per page, 50 unless set, at most 250.
max_bytesinteger–Only files of at most this size.
offsetinteger–Matches to skip.
tag––Tags to include, any of, e.g. ["encrypted"].
NameTypeReqDescription
catalog_versionstringyes–
countintegeryes–
fixturesarrayyes–
limitintegeryes–
next_offsetinteger|nullyes–
offsetintegeryes–
totalintegeryes–

No examples provided.

verify_file ~88

Hash a file on this machine and compare it with the published SHA-256 and size of a fixture. `status` is ok, changed or missing. The file is read only to hash it.

NameTypeReqDescription
filestringyesThe local file: absolute, or relative to where the server was started.
pathstringyesThe fixture path, e.g. "pdf/minimal.pdf".
NameTypeReqDescription
actual_bytesinteger|nullyes–
actual_sha256string|nullyes–
expected_bytesintegeryes–
expected_sha256stringyes–
filestringyes–
pathstringyes–
statusstringyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the loremfile MCP server?

loremfile runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y loremfile. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · loremfile

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add kumarprabhashanand-loremfile -- npx -y loremfile
Common questions

What is the loremfile MCP server?

loremfile is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.kumarprabhashanand/loremfile. CC0 sample files and test fixtures: find one, get its URL and SHA-256, check a copy on disk. This page covers its npm package (loremfile).

Is the loremfile MCP server safe to use?

loremfile scores 92 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the loremfile MCP server expose?

loremfile exposes 3 tools: list_fixtures, describe_fixture, verify_file. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 300 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the loremfile MCP server still maintained?

loremfile is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the loremfile MCP server under?

loremfile declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.