Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

KIRUPA Tutorials & Code Library

REMOTE · WWW.KIRUPA.COM

Search and read hundreds of web development, JavaScript, CSS, canvas, and DSA tutorials from KIRUPA.

Available components

+4 this week 81 Trust /100

Last scanned (10 hours ago)

Scores higher than 84% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Education and Research

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability83
  • 100% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Pass
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 627 tokens (~104/item across 6 items; 4 tools + 2 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management57
  • Stability observed for 17 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities40
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-03-26; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 21 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.kirupa.com/mcp/

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=kirupa.com CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 18 Oct 2026 16 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 1a3c6f17caaf46850e908104c0775888
SANs: kirupa.com, *.kirupa.com
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of www.kirupa.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
kirupa.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=2592000; includeSubDomains; preload
x-content-type-options nosniff
referrer-policy no-referrer

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://www.kirupa.com/mcp/ Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://www.kirupa.com/mcp/ HTTPS enforced 301 https://www.kirupa.com/mcp/
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~511 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
find_related_links ~99

Given a topic, concept, or an existing kirupa.com tutorial URL/slug, find related kirupa.com tutorials with ready-to-use Markdown links and summaries.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger–Maximum number of related links to return (1 to 15, default 6).
topic_or_urlstringyesA topic phrase (e.g. "graph traversal algorithms") or an existing kirupa.com tutorial URL/slug to find neighbors for.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_tutorial ~134

Fetch the complete, clean Markdown text and extracted code blocks of a kirupa.com tutorial by its URL, section/slug identifier (e.g. "javascript/closures_in_javascript"), slug, or title.

NameTypeReqDescription
code_onlyboolean–When true, returns only the extracted fenced code snippets and metadata instead of the full tutorial text.
identifierstringyesTutorial URL (e.g. "https://www.kirupa.com/html5/animating_with_requestAnimationFrame.htm"), section/slug ("html5/animating_with_requestAnimationFrame"), slug ("animating_with_requestAnimationFrame")…

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_sections ~99

List all topic sections on kirupa.com with tutorial counts and sample articles, or list the tutorials inside a specific section.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger–Maximum number of tutorials to list when a section is specified (default 25, max 100).
sectionstring–Optional section slug (e.g. "data_structures_algorithms", "canvas", "javascript", "animations", "html5", "react") to list tutorials from.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_tutorials ~179

Search hundreds of tutorials and articles on kirupa.com covering JavaScript, TypeScript, CSS, HTML5 Canvas, animations, React, and data structures & algorithms using full-text search (FTS5 + BM25). Returns matching tutorials with canonical URLs, clean Markdown URLs, matching section headings, and excerpts.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger–Maximum number of tutorials to return (1 to 15, default 5).
querystringyesKeywords, concept, or technical question to search for (e.g. "requestAnimationFrame delta time", "quicksort", "canvas starfield", "closures").
sectionstring–Optional section filter: data_structures_algorithms, javascript, html5, canvas, animations, react, codingexercises, ai, product_development, podcast, or hodgepodge.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the KIRUPA Tutorials & Code Library MCP server?

KIRUPA Tutorials & Code Library is a hosted endpoint at https://www.kirupa.com/mcp/, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · www.kirupa.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http kirupa-kirupa 'https://www.kirupa.com/mcp/'
Common questions

What is the KIRUPA Tutorials & Code Library MCP server?

KIRUPA Tutorials & Code Library is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.kirupa/kirupa. Search and read hundreds of web development, JavaScript, CSS, canvas, and DSA tutorials from KIRUPA. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.kirupa.com/mcp/).

Is the KIRUPA Tutorials & Code Library MCP server safe to use?

KIRUPA Tutorials & Code Library scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the KIRUPA Tutorials & Code Library MCP server expose?

KIRUPA Tutorials & Code Library exposes 4 tools: search_tutorials, get_tutorial, find_related_links, list_sections. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 511 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the KIRUPA Tutorials & Code Library MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to KIRUPA Tutorials & Code Library without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the KIRUPA Tutorials & Code Library MCP server still maintained?

KIRUPA Tutorials & Code Library is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.