Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Venue Authority

MCPB · VENUE-AUTHORITY-MCP-0.1.0.MCPB

Verify food-service facilities against supported regulator records.

0 this week 56 Trust /100

Last scanned (14 hours ago)

Scores higher than 90% of MCPB servers

Category Health and Science

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security25
  • No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
  • Known CVEs were checked across the 3 of 3 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree.Partial
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 0 of 3 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency45
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 75 days ago).Pass
  • Security-disclosure policy not yet verified: we couldn't inspect the source repository.Unverified
Schema Quality & AI Usability57
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 150 tokens (~50/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage67
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (14)

  • Known CVEs
  • Install scripts
  • Dependency health
  • Source repository
  • Provenance
  • License
  • Maintenance
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Checks we could not complete (2)

These are gaps on our side, not findings about this package. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.

  • Malware scan in Supply Chain SecurityNo malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.
  • Security disclosure in Provenance & TransparencySecurity-disclosure policy not yet verified: we couldn't inspect the source repository.

Does not apply to this package (2)

  • Endpoint SecurityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.
  • Transport & ReachabilityScored on hosted endpoints only. A package has no live endpoint of its own for us to probe.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 0
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 3 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 2 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 27 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 −1
    • Stability: pass → 0.93 functional
  • 19 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 18 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed mcpb/https://github.com/kingymon1/venue-authority-api/releases/download/clients-v0.1.0/venue-authority-mcp-0.1.0.mcpb

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem mcpb
Reason No attestation published

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Dependencies 3 packages
Packages resolved 3
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 3 exposed · ~150 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
venue_authority_coverage ~31

Read current supported regulator sources, record counts, availability, and freshness. Public and not metered.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

venue_authority_get_facility ~52

Retrieve one canonical regulator facility and its source-linked evidence. Requires VENUE_AUTHORITY_API_KEY and may consume one prepaid unit.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyes–
requestIdstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

venue_authority_resolve ~67

Resolve a merchant name and street address against supported regulator records. Requires VENUE_AUTHORITY_API_KEY and may consume one prepaid unit; exact replays are not charged twice.

NameTypeReqDescription
addressstringyes–
namestringyes–
requestIdstring––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Venue Authority MCP server?

Venue Authority ships as an MCPB bundle, a single file you download and open in an MCP host that supports MCPB bundles, such as Claude Desktop. The host reads the launch command from the bundle's own manifest, so there is no command to copy. The MCP registry declares no SHA-256 for this bundle, so there is no published digest to check the download against.

mcpb · venue-authority-mcp-0.1.0.mcpb

Download bundle

The MCP registry declares no SHA-256 for this bundle, so there is no published digest to check it against. Open it with an MCPB-capable host such as Claude Desktop.

Common questions

What is the Venue Authority MCP server?

Venue Authority is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.kingymon1/venue-authority. Verify food-service facilities against supported regulator records. This page covers its MCPB bundle (https://github.com/kingymon1/venue-authority-api/releases/download/clients-v0.1.0/venue-authority-mcp-0.1.0.mcpb).

Is the Venue Authority MCP server safe to use?

Venue Authority scores 56 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Venue Authority MCP server expose?

Venue Authority exposes 3 tools: venue_authority_coverage, venue_authority_resolve, venue_authority_get_facility. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 150 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

What licence is the Venue Authority MCP server under?

Venue Authority declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.

What did VerifyMCP test on the Venue Authority MCP server?

VerifyMCP ran 14 checks on Venue Authority, covering Known CVEs, Install scripts, Dependency health, Source repository and 10 more. 2 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about Venue Authority: Malware scan and Security disclosure. Endpoint Security and Transport & Reachability do not apply to an MCPB bundle, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.