Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

AtCoder MCP Server

REMOTE · API.KSRNYX.TOP

Search AtCoder problems and fetch public problem statements through MCP.

Available components

0 this week 82 Trust /100

Last scanned (9 hours ago)

Scores higher than 85% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Education and Research

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability69
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 173 tokens (~43/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 14 Oct 26 0
    • HSTS header: unverified → fail ▼ security
    • Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
    • Injection markers: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Stability: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • TLS certificate: unverified → pass ▲ security
    • Transport: fail → pass ▲ security
    • Endpoint reachability: unreachable → reachable ▲ functional
    • Tool coverage: unverified → 100 ▲ functional
    • MCP protocol: unverified → pass ▲ functional
  • 13 Oct 26 0
    • Endpoint reachability: reachable → unreachable ▼ security
    • HSTS header: fail → unverified ▼ security
    • Stability: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Authorization: partial → unverified ▼ security
    • Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • TLS certificate: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Transport: pass → fail ▼ security
    • Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
    • First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 26 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Aug 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 11 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 31 Jul 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://api.ksrnyx.top/oj-mcp/atcoder/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=api.ksrnyx.top CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 27 Sept 2026 26 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 616ae81a860d55e1fa177e606002562627e
SANs: api.ksrnyx.top
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of api.ksrnyx.top. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
top. present 41508 13 Verified
ksrnyx.top. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://api.ksrnyx.top/oj-mcp/atcoder/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://api.ksrnyx.top/oj-mcp/atcoder/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://api.ksrnyx.top/oj-mcp/atcoder/mcp
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~173 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
oj_capabilities ~22

Report the audited anonymous AtCoder read surface and explicitly unsupported operations.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

oj_fetch_problem ~45

Fetch one public problem statement from an exact contest/task pair or canonical atcoder.jp task URL. Returns sanitized HTML with preserved math, samples, limits, hashes, and source provenance.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

oj_health ~24

Report local readiness and the latest observed AtCoder page-read status without probing upstream.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

oj_search_problems ~82

Resolve exactly one contest/task id, atcoder:contest/task id, or canonical task URL. Free-text and catalog crawling are not supported.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitintegeryes–
localestring––
platformstringyes–
querystringyes–
requestIdstringyes–
schemaVersionstringyes–

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the AtCoder MCP Server server?

AtCoder MCP Server is a hosted endpoint at https://api.ksrnyx.top/oj-mcp/atcoder/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · api.ksrnyx.top

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http ketherworks-atcoder 'https://api.ksrnyx.top/oj-mcp/atcoder/mcp'
Common questions

What is the AtCoder MCP Server server?

AtCoder MCP Server is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.ketherworks/atcoder. Search AtCoder problems and fetch public problem statements through MCP. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://api.ksrnyx.top/oj-mcp/atcoder/mcp).

Is the AtCoder MCP Server server safe to use?

AtCoder MCP Server scores 82 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the AtCoder MCP Server server expose?

AtCoder MCP Server exposes 4 tools: oj_capabilities, oj_health, oj_fetch_problem, oj_search_problems. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 173 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the AtCoder MCP Server server require authentication?

No. We connected to AtCoder MCP Server without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the AtCoder MCP Server server still maintained?

AtCoder MCP Server is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.