Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Formquote

REMOTE · FORMQUOTE-MCP.CHEN-YU-D1.WORKERS.DEV

Published prices and licence fit for email verification, sound effect packs and font licences.

65 Trust /100

Last scanned (12 hours ago)

Scores higher than 47% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 18 Oct 2026.

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability61
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1738 tokens (~434/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management7
  • Stability observed for 2 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 17 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 16 Oct 26 64

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 18 Oct 2026 · Probed https://formquote-mcp.chen-yu-d1.workers.dev/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=chen-yu-d1.workers.dev CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 9 Oct 2026 7 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 d58b962986fc2f4513bad7fd67f11530
SANs: chen-yu-d1.workers.dev, *.chen-yu-d1.workers.dev
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of formquote-mcp.chen-yu-d1.workers.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. present 60074 8 Verified
workers.dev. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
x-content-type-options nosniff

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://formquote-mcp.chen-yu-d1.workers.dev/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://formquote-mcp.chen-yu-d1.workers.dev/mcp Inconclusive 405
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~1,547 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
compare_email_verification_prices ~341

Compare what it costs to verify (clean, validate) a list of email addresses with MillionVerifier, Reoon, DeBounce and Emailable, from their published credit packs and monthly plans. Use this when the user asks how much it costs to verify a number of emails, which email verification service is cheapest for their list size, or how many credit packs to buy. Give only the number of emails, never the addresses. Credits the user already holds with a supplier can be counted. Returns the packs ranked within comparable groups (one-time packs vs monthly plans, per currency), the price for this request, the cost allocated to this job, what is unconfirmed, the date each price was checked and the seller’s page. These are published list prices, not live checkout quotes; it does not verify emails or buy anything.

NameTypeReqDescription
emailsintegeryesHow many email addresses need verifying (1 to 10,000,000). Only the count, never the addresses.
existing_creditsobject–Unexpired verification credits the user already holds, by supplier (optional), e.g. {"reoon": 5000}.
goalstring–How to rank: lowest_cash_now = least money to pay now for whole packs or plans; lowest_job_cost = lowest cost allocated to this job (leftover credits keep their value); best_requirement_fit = best ma…
langstring–Language of the Formquote page linked in the answer (en, zh, ja, fr, de). The figures are the same; notes recorded by Formquote stay in their original language (mostly Chinese).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

compare_font_licenses ~538

Check which licence a use needs, and what it costs, for a small, hand-checked set of fonts: Pangram Pangram’s Font Starter Packs, Fontwerk Push, Grilli Type GT Cinetype and Fontfabric Nexa (6 offers). Use this when the user asks whether one of these fonts can be used on a website, on desktop, in print, in an app or game, in a logo or in paid ads, and what licence and price that needs: users, websites, monthly pageviews or unique visitors per site, years of use. Returns each offer’s published price where one applies, which requirements fail or are unconfirmed (for example pageview caps, PV versus UV, styles chosen at the foundry) and the foundry’s page. Other typefaces are not covered; say so instead of guessing. Published prices; nothing is bought.

NameTypeReqDescription
commercial_projectsinteger–Commercial projects per year (optional).
commercial_useboolean–Commercial use? (optional)
goalstring–How to rank: lowest_cash_now = least money to pay now for whole packs or plans; lowest_job_cost = lowest cost allocated to this job (leftover credits keep their value); best_requirement_fit = best ma…
langstring–Language of the Formquote page linked in the answer (en, zh, ja, fr, de). The figures are the same; notes recorded by Formquote stay in their original language (mostly Chinese).
license_usestringyesweb (webfonts on a site), desktop (installed for design work) or both.
mediumstring–Where it is used. A plain website licence does not cover a web app, app, game, logo or paid ads.
monthly_pageviewsinteger–Traffic cap needed per website per month, in the unit of traffic_metric (default 5,000).
print_projectsinteger–Print projects (optional).
print_unitsinteger–Printed units (optional).
requires_all_stylesboolean–Does the user need every weight and style of the family? (optional)
seatsinteger–People who will use the font (default 1).
term_yearsinteger–Years the font will be used (default 1). Yearly plans only confirm the first year’s price.
traffic_metricstring–pv = pageviews, uv = unique visitors. They are not converted into each other.
websitesinteger–Websites the font will be used on (default 1).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

compare_sound_effects_licenses ~475

Check prices and licence fit for a small, hand-checked set of sound effect packs: UI clicks and snaps, motion-graphics sounds, desert wind and train ambiences, and a kettle whistle, from SoundMorph, HISSandaROAR and Thomas Rex Beverly Audio (8 packs). Use this when the user wants sound effects for an app, game, video or interface and asks what a pack costs or whether its licence allows their use: commercial work, number of seats, AI training or generation, reselling the sounds, or a product where the sounds are a large share. Returns each pack’s price, whether it fits (eligible, conditional or not eligible) and which licence points still need the seller’s confirmation. It covers only these packs, not whole sound libraries; say so if none fits. Published prices; nothing is bought.

NameTypeReqDescription
ai_useboolean–Will the audio itself be used to train or generate with AI? (Asking an AI chat for prices is not AI use.) Default false.
commercial_useboolean–Will the sounds be used in commercial work? Default true.
goalstring–How to rank: lowest_cash_now = least money to pay now for whole packs or plans; lowest_job_cost = lowest cost allocated to this job (leftover credits keep their value); best_requirement_fit = best ma…
intentstringyesWhat the sounds are for: ui (interface clicks, snaps), motion (motion graphics), nature (ambiences such as wind), train, kettle, or any.
langstring–Language of the Formquote page linked in the answer (en, zh, ja, fr, de). The figures are the same; notes recorded by Formquote stay in their original language (mostly Chinese).
pure_sfx_percentnumber–Optional: the share (0–100) of the finished product’s total duration that is this supplier’s sound effects alone, with no voice or music. Some licences restrict products where it reaches 25%.
seatsinteger–People or workstations that will use the sounds (default 1).
standalone_resaleboolean–Will the sounds be resold or redistributed on their own (as a sound pack)? Default false.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_formquote_catalog ~193

List everything Formquote has price evidence for: email verification credit packs and plans (MillionVerifier, Reoon, DeBounce, Emailable), sound effect packs (SoundMorph, HISSandaROAR, Thomas Rex Beverly Audio) and font licences (Pangram Pangram, Fontwerk, Grilli Type, Fontfabric), with each listed price, billing period, the date it was checked and the seller’s page. Use this to see what is covered, or when the user asks for one of these suppliers’ listed prices. To price a specific need, use the compare_* tools instead.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystring–Only this category (optional; default all three).
langstring–Language of the Formquote page linked in the answer (en, zh, ja, fr, de). The figures are the same; notes recorded by Formquote stay in their original language (mostly Chinese).

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Formquote MCP server?

Formquote is a hosted endpoint at https://formquote-mcp.chen-yu-d1.workers.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · formquote-mcp.chen-yu-d1.workers.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http keith-cy-formquote-mcp 'https://formquote-mcp.chen-yu-d1.workers.dev/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Formquote MCP server?

Formquote is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Keith-CY/formquote-mcp. Published prices and licence fit for email verification, sound effect packs and font licences. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://formquote-mcp.chen-yu-d1.workers.dev/mcp).

Is the Formquote MCP server safe to use?

Formquote scores 65 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Formquote MCP server expose?

Formquote exposes 4 tools: compare_email_verification_prices, compare_sound_effects_licenses, compare_font_licenses, list_formquote_catalog. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,547 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Formquote MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Formquote without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Formquote MCP server still maintained?

Formquote is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 18 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.