TestAtlas
NUGET · TESTATLAS.MCP
Semantic map of a .NET test-automation solution for AI agents — search, impact, endpoints
Available components
Last scanned (20 hours ago)
Scores higher than 83% of NuGet servers
Category Testing and QA
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency48
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Build provenance not yet verified. View diagnostics → Unverified
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 23 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability84
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 1116 tokens (~101/item across 11 items; 11 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
- No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 11 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 12 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 2 Nov 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 1 Nov 26 −1
- Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
- 26 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed nuget/TestAtlas.Mcp@0.1.15
Provenance Inconclusive
We could not complete the check, so nothing is claimed either way. This is a gap on our side, not a finding about the package.
| Result | Inconclusive |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | nuget |
| Reason | Signature present, unverified |
Signer
| Signed as | Repository signature, names nuget.org |
|---|---|
| Subject | CN=NuGet.org Repository by Microsoft,O=NuGet.org Repository by Microsoft,L=Redmond,ST=Washington,C=US |
| Issuer | CN=DigiCert Trusted G4 Code Signing RSA4096 SHA384 2021 CA1,O=DigiCert\, Inc.,C=US |
| Valid from | 23 Feb 2024 |
| Valid until | 18 May 2027 |
| Service index | https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json |
| Owners | Karzone |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 0 packages
| Packages resolved | 0 |
|---|---|
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
Registry declarations For information only
What the registry and the package's own manifest say about this version. The publisher or the registry writes these, nothing here is verified, and none of it affects the score.
| Repository | https://github.com/Karzone/TestAtlas |
|---|---|
| Repository type | git |
| Commit | f853458f93535abd6a492036af07dbb6a6dad7c1 |
| Project URL | https://github.com/Karzone/TestAtlas |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_scenario ~95
Full detail of scenario(s) whose name contains the given text: feature, tags, kind, example-row count, file:line, and the ordered steps (keyword + text + doc-string/data-table flags). Use to read an existing scenario before writing a similar one.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | Max scenarios (default 10). |
| name | string | yes | Substring of the scenario name to match (case-insensitive). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_step_definition ~99
Full detail of step definition(s) whose expression contains the given text: keyword, expression kind, method parameters, C# class/method/signature, file:line, and the scenarios that currently use it (usage count). Use to inspect a step before reusing or changing it.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | Max definitions (default 20). |
| query | string | yes | Substring of the step-definition expression to match (case-insensitive). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
impact ~89
Blast radius of a change: the test scenarios affected by changing a class, method, step definition, or endpoint. Returns the affected scenarios (feature + the connecting step text), plus step-definition and feature counts.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| target | string | yes | What kind of entity to trace. |
| value | string | yes | The name/route to match (class or method name, step expression substring, or endpoint route substring). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_endpoints ~53
The HTTP endpoints/operations the suite calls, each with verb, route (real path when known), and its scenario blast radius. Highest-reach first.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | Max rows (default 50). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
list_tags ~69
The tag taxonomy across the suite — every scenario tag (e.g. @smoke, @regression, ticket ids) with the number of scenarios carrying it, most-used first. Use to tag new scenarios consistently with what already exists.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | Max tags (default 200). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
project_dependencies ~102
The project dependency graph the suite implies: for each project, which projects it depends on and which depend on it, derived from cross-project binds_to/uses_type/inherits edges (edge counts as weight). Answers e.g. "what depends on the Party project?". Optional 'project' name filter.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | Max projects (default 200). |
| project | string | – | Optional: substring of a project name to focus on (case-insensitive). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
resolve_step ~204
Resolve a Gherkin step phrase to the EXISTING step definition(s) that would bind it — the same way the runner does (regex/cucumber expression, keyword-agnostic). Use this BEFORE writing a new step so an agent reuses what already exists instead of authoring a duplicate. status is 'exact' (one binding — reuse it), 'ambiguous' (several match — a conflict to resolve), or 'none' (nothing binds — returns existing step definitions ranked by shared terms, to adapt rather than duplicate). Each match returns the expression, the C# class/method, the method parameters, the argument values captured from the phrase, and file:line.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyword | string | – | Optional; informational only — matching is keyword-agnostic, as in Reqnroll/SpecFlow. |
| text | string | yes | The step phrase to resolve, without the leading Given/When/Then keyword (e.g. "the customer checks out"). |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_scenarios ~72
Find the tests for a topic: full-text search over scenarios (feature name + scenario name + step text + tags). Returns matching scenarios with feature and file:line. Use this instead of grepping .feature files when asked to find, list or count tests.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | Search terms. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
search_steps ~46
Full-text search over step definitions (expression text + method + class name). Returns matching step definitions. Use this instead of grepping binding classes.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | string | yes | Search terms. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
stats ~30
Summary of the test map: project/class/method counts, class-kind breakdown, endpoints, and edge tallies.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
step_catalog ~122
The reusable step vocabulary: step definitions with their placeholders and (best-effort) allowed values pulled from the expression — cucumber {int}/{string}/{word}, regex alternations like (Auto|Allianz) as enum values, other groups as free parameters. Use to compose new scenarios from steps and values that already exist. Optional keyword/query filters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| keyword | string | – | Optional: only steps declared with this attribute keyword. |
| limit | integer | – | Max steps (default 100). |
| query | string | – | Optional: only steps whose expression contains this text. |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the TestAtlas MCP server?
TestAtlas runs locally as a NuGet package, launched with dnx TestAtlas.Mcp@0.1.15 --yes. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
nuget · TestAtlas.Mcp
claude mcp add karzone-testatlas-mcp -- dnx TestAtlas.Mcp@0.1.15 --yes
What is the TestAtlas MCP server?
TestAtlas is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Karzone/TestAtlas.Mcp. Semantic map of a .NET test-automation solution for AI agents, search, impact, endpoints. This page covers its NuGet package (TestAtlas.Mcp).
Is the TestAtlas MCP server safe to use?
TestAtlas scores 84 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 4 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the TestAtlas MCP server expose?
TestAtlas exposes 11 tools: stats, impact, search_steps, search_scenarios, list_endpoints, and 6 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 981 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the TestAtlas MCP server still maintained?
TestAtlas is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the TestAtlas MCP server under?
TestAtlas declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.