io.github.kar69-96/agentpay
NPM · @USEAGENTPAY/MCP-SERVER · SCANNED SEP 20
AI agent payments with human approval. Local-first, encrypted credentials, budget controls.
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security98
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- Known CVEs were checked across the 96 of 97 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree.Partial
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- Dependency health was assessed across the 96 of 97 dependencies we could resolve, so this covers what we could see, not the whole tree. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency19
- Repository check failed: the declared repository URL returned HTTP 404. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 218 days ago).Pass
- Security-disclosure policy not yet verified: we couldn't inspect the source repository.Unverified
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema quality not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Protocol version not yet verified: this package could not be installed in a clean environment, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified
Unverified: 5 categories
Categories scored 0 because our sandbox run of this package has not given us the schema these checks need to read. That is a gap on our side rather than a finding about the package, and we only credit what we can confirm, so the score stands at 0 until the capture succeeds. We are working through the fleet, so this normally clears without any action from you. How we score packages →
How do I install the io.github.kar69-96/agentpay MCP server?
io.github.kar69-96/agentpay runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @useagentpay/mcp-server. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · @useagentpay/mcp-server
claude mcp add kar69-96-agentpay -- npx -y @useagentpay/mcp-server
{
"mcpServers": {
"kar69-96-agentpay": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@useagentpay/mcp-server"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"kar69-96-agentpay": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@useagentpay/mcp-server"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add kar69-96-agentpay -- npx -y @useagentpay/mcp-server
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"kar69-96-agentpay": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"@useagentpay/mcp-server"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add kar69-96-agentpay --command npx --arg -y --arg @useagentpay/mcp-server
mcp_servers:
kar69-96-agentpay:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "@useagentpay/mcp-server"] {
"McpServers": {
"kar69-96-agentpay": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"@useagentpay/mcp-server"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add kar69-96-agentpay -t stdio -c npx -a -y @useagentpay/mcp-server
{
"mcpServers": {
"kar69-96-agentpay": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@useagentpay/mcp-server"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 11 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 5 Aug 26 0
- CVE-2026-69207 no longer affects this package ▲ security
- Known CVEs: fail → partial ▲ security
- 4 Aug 26 0
- CVE-2026-69207 affects this package: medium ▼ security
- Known CVEs: partial → fail ▼ security
- 2 Aug 26 0
- Provenance: unverified → fail ▼ security
- Install scripts: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Known CVEs: unverified → partial ▲ security
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- License: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- Dependency health: unverified → partial ▲ functional
- Maintenance: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- Licence: MIT functional
- 31 Jul 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 30 Jul 26 0
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Dependency health: partial → unverified ▼ functional
- Schema quality: Schema quality not yet verified: our sandbox run of this package did not complete, so we have no schema to assess. functional
- Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: our sandbox run of this package did not complete, so we have no tool definitions to assess. functional
- 28 Jul 26 0
- Dependency health: unverified → partial ▲ functional
- Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the tool definitions this version of the package serves yet. functional
- Schema quality: Schema quality not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet. functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/@useagentpay/mcp-server@0.1.8
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 96 packages
| Packages resolved | 96 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 31 |
| Tree resolution | Partial |
The dependency tree was only partially resolved, so these counts may be incomplete.
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. The most recent sandbox run could not capture a tool list from this package.
What is the io.github.kar69-96/agentpay MCP server?
io.github.kar69-96/agentpay is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.kar69-96/agentpay. AI agent payments with human approval. Local-first, encrypted credentials, budget controls. This page covers its npm package (@useagentpay/mcp-server).
Is the io.github.kar69-96/agentpay MCP server safe to use?
io.github.kar69-96/agentpay scores 33 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
Is the io.github.kar69-96/agentpay MCP server still maintained?
io.github.kar69-96/agentpay is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the io.github.kar69-96/agentpay MCP server under?
io.github.kar69-96/agentpay declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.