Workflow MCP
OCI · DOCKER.IO/JULIUSOLSSON/WORKFLOW-MCP@SHA256:4B6889F9E78D0208E6D1D343BA23D0C5D092B1A1513A73C9C85DEB2D00AB5855
Session-bound Docker workflow server through Codex. State is discarded with the container.
Last scanned (2 hours ago)
Scores higher than 23% of OCI servers
Category Cloud Infrastructure
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security0
- No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
- Known CVEs could not be checked: this image's dependency list comes from an SBOM its publisher attached, which nothing verifies, so we will not report it as a clean result. View diagnostics → Unverified
- Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
- Dependency health could not be checked: this image's dependency list comes from an SBOM its publisher attached. It names packages and versions but not whether each is deprecated, still maintained or linked to its source, so there is nothing we can fairly grade.Unverified
Provenance & Transparency48
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 100 days ago).Pass
- Publishes a security disclosure policy (SECURITY.md).Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema quality not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Protocol version not yet verified: this server's registry entry declares environment variables (an API key or similar), and its server did not start in our sandbox, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified
Unverified: 6 categories
Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 4 Nov 26 0
- Provenance: unverified → fail ▼ security
- 3 Nov 26 0
- Provenance: fail → unverified ▼ security
- 1 Nov 26 0
- Provenance: unverified → fail ▼ security
- 31 Oct 26 0
- Provenance: fail → unverified ▼ security
- 13 Oct 26 0
- Provenance: unverified → fail ▼ security
- 12 Oct 26 +4
- Maintenance: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- License: unverified → pass ▲ functional
- Licence: MIT functional
- 10 Oct 26 −4
- Provenance: fail → unverified ▼ security
- Maintenance: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- License: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Licence: MIT functional
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed oci/docker.io/juliusolsson/workflow-mcp@sha256:4b6889f9e78d0208e6d1d343ba23d0c5d092b1a1513a73c9c85deb2d00ab5855
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | oci |
| Reason | No attestation published |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Vulnerabilities 41 ungraded findings
From the publisher's SBOM, not graded. These advisories match packages listed in the SBOM the publisher attached to this image. A publisher naming a vulnerable package in their own image is credible, so we show them. Nothing verifies that SBOM, though, so the Known CVEs signal does not grade the image from it.
| ID | CVE | Severity | Vector | Fix available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHSA-rmxm-3fg6-px4f | CVE-2026-118663 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-22jm-h49p-29qw | CVE-2026-111767 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L | yes |
| GHSA-46jr-4wx8-v453 | CVE-2026-111768 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-6prh-2h8m-c8cw | CVE-2026-111769 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-6qxp-vccf-f47h | CVE-2026-104850 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-f897-62hf-6gxq | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes | |
| GHSA-rvq5-wwqv-78pq | CVE-2026-111771 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-27r3-jxmh-p828 | CVE-2026-111181 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
| GHSA-333x-w4r6-6crp | CVE-2026-110725 | low | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-5jgf-p345-68v8 | CVE-2026-75931 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-7p8r-x3mc-p8w7 | CVE-2026-18446 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-f65p-4m7j-42xc | CVE-2026-75975 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-fph4-wmhf-6fwf | CVE-2026-75899 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-hrr3-gc8f-f4qj | CVE-2026-86472 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-jqff-g426-hqxp | CVE-2026-76172 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-qw65-cvwx-89v3 | CVE-2026-84292 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-w74x-v6f9-j3xg | CVE-2026-110306 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-wjr9-j795-jxcr | CVE-2026-110180 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-xhq7-xmqj-769h | CVE-2026-110095 | low | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-54fx-42gc-7vw4 | CVE-2026-71848 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L | yes |
| GHSA-5r4p-p66f-jhc7 | CVE-2026-109955 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-79qm-7rj5-m7r9 | CVE-2026-71849 | low | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-8j4g-w8fx-2239 | CVE-2026-69207 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L | yes |
| GHSA-crvj-82cr-hjcx | CVE-2026-84363 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-f23p-vx2j-j53r | CVE-2026-71850 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-g6gw-c38x-mqfc | CVE-2026-84364 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L | yes |
| GHSA-gqvv-2mrq-wpjv | CVE-2026-84365 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-hxh3-vqpv-xpqv | CVE-2026-93981 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-22jq-vg5j-6vgg | CVE-2026-54272 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-2vr4-cq9g-pvrc | CVE-2026-101910 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-4xrf-jv44-h6hh | CVE-2026-69198 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-h3mg-xc3c-68pw | CVE-2026-101911 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-j6r3-76f7-8jcv | CVE-2026-101912 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-mwp4-54f8-5fhr | CVE-2026-69192 | high | yes | |
| GHSA-rpw4-54j3-4h4q | CVE-2026-101913 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-rxp7-6hxx-x8q5 | CVE-2026-111997 | medium | yes | |
| GHSA-jqcg-44mw-7w3h | CVE-2026-90711 | critical | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N | yes |
| GHSA-4mjr-xmp4-gh2g | CVE-2026-82417 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L | yes |
| GHSA-6pq8-jhm2-2vcw | CVE-2026-110816 | medium | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L | yes |
| GHSA-x5fp-wj9c-mxmx | CVE-2026-82562 | low | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L | yes |
| GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5 | CVE-2023-54404 | high | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H | yes |
Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. The most recent sandbox run could not capture a tool list from this package.
How do I install the Workflow MCP server?
Workflow MCP runs locally as a container image, launched with docker run --rm -i -e OPENAI_API_KEY -e WORKFLOW_MCP_CONCURRENCY docker.io/juliusolsson/workflow-mcp@sha256:4b6889f9e78d0208e6d1d343ba23d0c5d092b1a1513a73c9c85deb2d00ab5855. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
oci · docker.io/juliusolsson/workflow-mcp@sha256:4b6889f9e78d0208e6d1d343ba23d0c5d092b1a1513a73c9c85deb2d00ab5855
claude mcp add juliusolsson05-workflow-mcp -- docker run --rm -i -e OPENAI_API_KEY -e WORKFLOW_MCP_CONCURRENCY docker.io/juliusolsson/workflow-mcp@sha256:4b6889f9e78d0208e6d1d343ba23d0c5d092b1a1513a73c9c85deb2d00ab5855
This image reads OPENAI_API_KEY and WORKFLOW_MCP_CONCURRENCY. Set them in your client's env block for this server; docker run -e passes each one through to the container.
What is the Workflow MCP server?
Workflow MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.Juliusolsson05/workflow-mcp. Session-bound Docker workflow server through Codex. State is discarded with the container. This page covers its container image (docker.io/juliusolsson/workflow-mcp@sha256:4b6889f9e78d0208e6d1d343ba23d0c5d092b1a1513a73c9c85deb2d00ab5855).
Is the Workflow MCP server safe to use?
Workflow MCP scores 10 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. The SBOM its publisher attached lists packages with 41 known advisories as of 5 November 2026. We do not grade that SBOM, as nothing verifies it. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
Is the Workflow MCP server still maintained?
Workflow MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Workflow MCP server under?
Workflow MCP declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.