Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Droit français sourcé

REMOTE · DROIT.STUDJOOW.COM

Droit français et européen officiel (Légifrance, DILA, EUR-Lex, jurisprudence), réponses sourcées.

+3 this week 65 Trust /100

Last scanned (2 hours ago)

Scores higher than 45% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Education and Research

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security57
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability57
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1988 tokens (~152/item across 13 items; 13 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management47
  • Stability observed for 14 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 13 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 14 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 30 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 26 Oct 26 +1
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Schema quality: 1803 → 1988 ▼ functional
    • New tool “liens_droit_ue_france” functional
  • 24 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 0
    • The server rewrote its instructions, which are the text every model session reads security
    • Schema quality: 1635 → 1803 ▼ functional
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
    • New tool “analyser_conformite” functional
  • 22 Oct 26 59

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://droit.studjoow.com/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=droit.studjoow.com CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 21 Oct 2026 19 Jan 2027 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA 557e6022f809241fe6e516c0e1801a0ca93
SANs: droit.studjoow.com
CN=YR2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 4ebd24947e24d394802d84a52fd5b319
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of droit.studjoow.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
studjoow.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://droit.studjoow.com/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://droit.studjoow.com/mcp HTTPS enforced 302 https://droit.studjoow.com/mcp
MCP tools · 13 exposed · ~1,358 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
analyser_conformite ~143

Pré-analyse de conformité d'un projet en France et dans l'UE (RGPD, cookies, vente en ligne, abonnements, IA, DSA, droit d'auteur, mentions légales...). description : le projet en quelques phrases (activité, public, données collectées, paiement, prestataires, usage de l'IA). domaines : clés à forcer, séparées par des virgules. Renvoie les obligations probables, la question à vérifier pour chacune et l'outil pour lire le texte. Lire ensuite chaque texte avant de conclure : information juridique, pas certification.

NameTypeReqDescription
descriptionstringyes–
domainesstring––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

etat_base ~40

Comptes, date des dumps et du dernier incrémental DILA appliqué pour chaque base : à citer pour indiquer l'actualité des données.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

liens_droit_ue_france ~175

Liens entre droit de l'UE et droit français. Sans numero : reference est un acte européen (CELEX, RGPD, « directive 2019/770 »...) et on obtient les textes et articles français qui le transposent ou le citent. Avec numero : reference est un code (« Code de la consommation ») et numero un article (« L217-4 ») : on obtient les actes européens liés. source : transposition (mesures déclarées à l'Union) ou mention (article qui cite l'acte). Liste non exhaustive : seuls sont recensés les rattachements déclarés à l'Union et les citations expresses.

NameTypeReqDescription
limiteinteger––
numerostring––
referencestringyes–
sourcestring––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

lire_article ~89

Texte d'un article de code ou de loi, tel qu'en vigueur à une date. code : « Code civil », « Code du travail »... ; numero : « 1240 », « L1221-1 » ; date : AAAA-MM-JJ (défaut aujourd'hui).

NameTypeReqDescription
codestringyes–
datestring––
numerostringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

lire_decision ~53

Texte intégral d'une décision à partir de son identifiant (JURITEXT..., CONSTEXT..., CNILTEXT...).

NameTypeReqDescription
identifiantstringyes–
max_caracteresinteger––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

lire_texte ~57

Fiche et plan d'un texte : identifiant LEGITEXT/JORFTEXT, NOR, numéro IDCC d'une convention collective, ou nom (« Code de la consommation »).

NameTypeReqDescription
identifiant_ou_nomstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

lire_texte_ue ~137

Droit de l'UE : fiche, plan ou article d'un acte, ou texte d'un arrêt. reference : CELEX (32016R0679), alias (RGPD, DSA, DMA, RIA, TFUE, Charte), « règlement (UE) 2016/679 », « directive 93/13/CEE », numéro d'affaire (C-131/12) ou ECLI. article : « 17 », « premier », « Annexe III ».

NameTypeReqDescription
articlestring––
max_caracteresinteger––
referencestringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

lister_codes ~14

Liste des codes disponibles.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

rechercher_droit_ue ~89

Recherche plein texte dans les règlements, directives, traités et la Charte (en français). acte : restreindre à un acte (RGPD, 32022R2065...). Syntaxe : "phrase exacte", AND, OR, NOT, prefixe*.

NameTypeReqDescription
actestring––
limiteinteger––
requetestringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

rechercher_jurisprudence ~173

Recherche de décisions. base : jade (juridictions administratives), cass (Cour de cassation), capp (cours d'appel), inca (Cassation inédits), constit (Conseil constitutionnel), cnil. numero : pourvoi ou requête (21-21.185). du/au : AAAA-MM-JJ. tri : pertinence ou date.

NameTypeReqDescription
austring––
basestring––
dustring––
eclistring––
formationstring––
juridictionstring––
limiteinteger––
numerostring––
publiees_seulementboolean––
requetestring––
tristring––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

rechercher_jurisprudence_ue ~109

Recherche plein texte dans les arrêts de la Cour de justice de l'UE et du Tribunal (en français). du/au : AAAA-MM-JJ. tri : pertinence ou date. Lire ensuite l'arrêt avec lire_texte_ue (numéro d'affaire ou CELEX).

NameTypeReqDescription
austring––
dustring––
limiteinteger––
requetestringyes–
tristring––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

rechercher_loi ~143

Recherche plein texte dans les articles. base : legi (codes, lois, décrets consolidés, défaut), kali (conventions collectives), jorf (Journal officiel tel que publié) ou tout. Syntaxe : "phrase exacte", AND, OR, NOT, prefixe*. code : restreindre à un code, un texte ou « IDCC 1486 ». date : AAAA-MM-JJ, version en vigueur à cette date (défaut aujourd'hui).

NameTypeReqDescription
basestring––
codestring––
datestring––
limiteinteger––
requetestringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

verifier_references ~136

Contrôle que chaque référence existe avant de la citer. references : « Code civil 1240 », « LEGIARTI000032041571 », « 21-21.185 », « ECLI:FR:... », « RGPD art. 17 », « règlement (UE) 2024/1689, article 50 », « C-131/12 ». citations : extraits censés figurer mot pour mot dans la référence de même rang. Toute ligne INTROUVABLE ou citation ABSENTE interdit la citation.

NameTypeReqDescription
citations–––
datestring––
referencesarrayyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Droit français sourcé MCP server?

Droit français sourcé is a hosted endpoint at https://droit.studjoow.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · droit.studjoow.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http johnjackhouzi-droit-francais 'https://droit.studjoow.com/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Droit français sourcé MCP server?

Droit français sourcé is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.JohnJackHouzi/droit-francais. Droit français et européen officiel (Légifrance, DILA, EUR-Lex, jurisprudence), réponses sourcées. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://droit.studjoow.com/mcp).

Is the Droit français sourcé MCP server safe to use?

Droit français sourcé scores 65 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Droit français sourcé MCP server expose?

Droit français sourcé exposes 13 tools: lire_article, rechercher_loi, lire_texte, lister_codes, rechercher_jurisprudence, and 8 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,358 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Droit français sourcé MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Droit français sourcé without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Droit français sourcé MCP server still maintained?

Droit français sourcé is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.