Is It AI MCP
PYPI · IS-IT-AI-MCP · SCANNED SEP 20
MCP server that reads C2PA Content Credentials: what an image declares about its own origin
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- Runs hatchling.build at install time, a recognised native-build step with no shell scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
- 2 of 25 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
- Actively maintained (last published 31 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 518 tokens (~259/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management80
- Stability observed for 24 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
- Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
How do I install the Is It AI MCP server?
Is It AI MCP runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx is-it-ai-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
pypi · is-it-ai-mcp
claude mcp add johannsenlum-is-it-ai-mcp -- uvx is-it-ai-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"johannsenlum-is-it-ai-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"is-it-ai-mcp"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"johannsenlum-is-it-ai-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"is-it-ai-mcp"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add johannsenlum-is-it-ai-mcp -- uvx is-it-ai-mcp
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"johannsenlum-is-it-ai-mcp": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"uvx",
"is-it-ai-mcp"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add johannsenlum-is-it-ai-mcp --command uvx --arg is-it-ai-mcp
mcp_servers:
johannsenlum-is-it-ai-mcp:
command: "uvx"
args: ["is-it-ai-mcp"] {
"McpServers": {
"johannsenlum-is-it-ai-mcp": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "uvx",
"Arguments": [
"is-it-ai-mcp"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add johannsenlum-is-it-ai-mcp -t stdio -c uvx -a is-it-ai-mcp
{
"mcpServers": {
"johannsenlum-is-it-ai-mcp": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"is-it-ai-mcp"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 20 Sept 26 −3
- Stability: pass → 0.80 functional
- 19 Sept 26 0
- Stability: 0.97 → pass security
- 18 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Sept 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Sept 26 +15
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 14 Sept 26 −14
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
- 12 Sept 26 +16
- Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
- 11 Sept 26 −15
- Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed pypi/is-it-ai-mcp@0.1.0
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | pypi |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Install scripts 1 script
| Hook | Tier | Command |
|---|---|---|
| build_backend | allowlisted | hatchling.build |
Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →
Dependencies 25 packages
| Packages resolved | 25 |
|---|---|
| Stale | 2 |
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_image_provenance Check Image Provenance ~145
Read the C2PA Content Credential embedded in a single image file and report what it declares about the image's origin: whether it asserts AI generation or a real-world capture, and whether that assertion's cryptographic signature still verifies. This reads metadata the file already carries; it does not analyze pixels and cannot detect AI generation on its own. A missing or invalid credential is not evidence the image is human made, an AI image loses its credential the moment it is screenshotted or re-saved. Always read the result's 'what_this_does_not_mean' field before repeating its verdict.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | string | yes | Path to the local image file to inspect. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
scan_directory Scan Directory ~191
Walk a directory of images and report how many carry a C2PA Content Credential, broken down by verdict (AI_DECLARED, NO_AI_DECLARED, UNKNOWN) and by signer. This reproduces the sweep behind this project's own finding that roughly 96.5% of real images carry no credential at all. It reads only file metadata, never pixels, and touches no network. Returns counts and a capped sample of credentialed files, not a full file listing, so a large directory does not flood the response. If the directory has more images than 'limit', the scan is partial and the result says so explicitly rather than silently truncating.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | Maximum number of image files to scan. If exceeded, the scan is partial and the result says so. |
| path | string | yes | Path to the local directory to scan. |
| recursive | boolean | – | Recurse into subdirectories. |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
What is the Is It AI MCP server?
Is It AI MCP is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.JohannsenLum/is-it-ai-mcp. MCP server that reads C2PA Content Credentials: what an image declares about its own origin. This page covers its PyPI package (is-it-ai-mcp).
Is the Is It AI MCP server safe to use?
Is It AI MCP scores 81 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Is It AI MCP server expose?
Is It AI MCP exposes 2 tools: check_image_provenance, scan_directory. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 336 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the Is It AI MCP server still maintained?
Is It AI MCP is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.
What licence is the Is It AI MCP server under?
Is It AI MCP declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.