Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

referencesource.org

REMOTE · REFERENCESOURCE.ORG · 2 COMPONENTS · SCANNED SEP 21

Verified reference data; each record carries its source URL and quote. verify_quote checks claims.

0 this week 85 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability72
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 796 tokens (~199/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Install

How do I install the referencesource.org MCP server?

referencesource.org is a hosted endpoint at https://referencesource.org/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · referencesource.org

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http joelp22-maker-referencesource 'https://referencesource.org/mcp'
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "joelp22-maker-referencesource": {
      "url": "https://referencesource.org/mcp"
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "joelp22-maker-referencesource": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://referencesource.org/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.joelp22-maker-referencesource]
url = "https://referencesource.org/mcp"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "joelp22-maker-referencesource": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://referencesource.org/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add joelp22-maker-referencesource --url 'https://referencesource.org/mcp' --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  joelp22-maker-referencesource:
    url: "https://referencesource.org/mcp"
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "joelp22-maker-referencesource": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://referencesource.org/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add joelp22-maker-referencesource -t streamable-http -u 'https://referencesource.org/mcp'
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "joelp22-maker-referencesource": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://referencesource.org/mcp"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 10 Sept 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 8 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 6 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 4 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Sept 26 0
    • Tool “list_datasets” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: 169 → 199 functional
    • “list_datasets” added an optional parameter “full” cosmetic
    • “list_datasets” added an optional parameter “query” cosmetic
  • 1 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 70. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 21 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Aug 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 57 to 60. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 17 days of observed history at the previous scan, 18 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Aug 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 53. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 16 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 21 Sept 2026 · Probed https://referencesource.org/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=referencesource.org CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 5 Aug 2026 3 Nov 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 9f260b3a10521b060ef7a85ccbf0f716
SANs: referencesource.org
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of referencesource.org. Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
org. present 26974 8 Verified
referencesource.org. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://referencesource.org/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://referencesource.org/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://referencesource.org/mcp
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~638 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_record ~102

Fetch one record by id — for example, look up a FIPS 140 certificate's status, a state's boiler inspection rules, or a county's loan limit. Returns the full record with its source URL and verbatim source quote. Record ids appear in search_records results and in each record's url.

NameTypeReqDescription
dataset_slugstringyesDataset slug from list_datasets.
record_idstringyesThe record's id field, e.g. "ak".

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_datasets ~178

What reference datasets are available? Lists every published dataset with its title, record count, last-verified date and a one-sentence summary. Covers regulatory thresholds, version compatibility, certification registers, licensing rules and more. Pass `query` to list only the datasets matching a topic — that is much cheaper than reading the whole list. Use the returned slug with search_records or get_record.

NameTypeReqDescription
fullbooleanReturn each dataset's complete scope statement instead of the first sentence. Off by default: the full text is roughly four times the size and is rarely needed to choose a dataset.
querystringOptional topic filter, e.g. "boiler", "tariff" or "loan limit". Case-insensitive substring, matched against each dataset's slug, title and full description. Omit it to list every dataset.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_records ~124

Look up a specific record — search by state name, chemical, certificate number, product name or any keyword. Searches one dataset's records (case-insensitive substring match across all fields). Returns up to 20 matching records, each with its url, source and verbatim source_quote so the answer can be checked.

NameTypeReqDescription
dataset_slugstringyesDataset slug from list_datasets, e.g. "graduated-driver-licensing".
querystringyesSubstring to match, case-insensitive, e.g. a state code, chemical name or standard number.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

verify_quote ~234

Is this value actually right? Check a claimed fact against a published record instead of trusting it. Reports whether the claim matches the record's stored value (exact, case-insensitive or normalised — the match type is named), whether it appears in the record's verbatim source quote, and returns the source URL and quote so the claim can be traced upstream. Use this whenever you want to confirm a number, date, threshold or status before stating it. Verdicts: matches_record, matches_quote, differs or not_found.

NameTypeReqDescription
claimed_valuestringyesThe value to check, exactly as claimed, e.g. "$832,750" or "no passengers younger than 21".
dataset_slugstringyesDataset slug from list_datasets.
fieldstringField name to check the claim against, e.g. "limit_1_unit". Without it, every stored field is checked.
record_idstringThe record's id, if known (shown in search_records results and in each record's url). Without it, the dataset's stored values are searched for the claimed value.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the referencesource.org MCP server?

referencesource.org is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.joelp22-maker/referencesource. Verified reference data; each record carries its source URL and quote. verify_quote checks claims. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://referencesource.org/mcp).

Is the referencesource.org MCP server safe to use?

referencesource.org scores 85 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the referencesource.org MCP server expose?

referencesource.org exposes 4 tools: list_datasets, search_records, get_record, verify_quote. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 638 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the referencesource.org MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to referencesource.org without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the referencesource.org MCP server still maintained?

referencesource.org is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 21 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.