io.github.jmshinhwa/wp-plugin-review-gate
NPM · @READYSTACK/WP-PLUGIN-REVIEW-GATE · SCANNED SEP 20
The readme.txt and plugin-header lines that send a wordpress.org submission back, found before you s
Available components
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Supply Chain Security100
- No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
- No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
- No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
- No production dependencies, so there is no dependency health to assess. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency32
- Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
- Provenance check failed: no build-provenance attestation is published. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- License check failed: the license (SEE LICENSE IN LICENSE.txt) isn't a recognized OSI-approved license. See how to fix → Fail
- Actively maintained (last published 0 days ago).Pass
- Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability69
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Tool/resource definitions use about 133 tokens (~44/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage87
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 60% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
- Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Unverified: 1 category
A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.
How do I install the io.github.jmshinhwa/wp-plugin-review-gate MCP server?
io.github.jmshinhwa/wp-plugin-review-gate runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @readystack/wp-plugin-review-gate. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
npm · @readystack/wp-plugin-review-gate
claude mcp add jmshinhwa-wp-plugin-review-gate -- npx -y @readystack/wp-plugin-review-gate
{
"mcpServers": {
"jmshinhwa-wp-plugin-review-gate": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@readystack/wp-plugin-review-gate"
]
}
}
} {
"servers": {
"jmshinhwa-wp-plugin-review-gate": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@readystack/wp-plugin-review-gate"
]
}
}
} codex mcp add jmshinhwa-wp-plugin-review-gate -- npx -y @readystack/wp-plugin-review-gate
{
"$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
"mcp": {
"jmshinhwa-wp-plugin-review-gate": {
"type": "local",
"command": [
"npx",
"-y",
"@readystack/wp-plugin-review-gate"
],
"enabled": true
}
}
} openclaw mcp add jmshinhwa-wp-plugin-review-gate --command npx --arg -y --arg @readystack/wp-plugin-review-gate
mcp_servers:
jmshinhwa-wp-plugin-review-gate:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "@readystack/wp-plugin-review-gate"] {
"McpServers": {
"jmshinhwa-wp-plugin-review-gate": {
"Transport": "stdio",
"Command": "npx",
"Arguments": [
"-y",
"@readystack/wp-plugin-review-gate"
]
}
}
} assistant mcp add jmshinhwa-wp-plugin-review-gate -t stdio -c npx -a -y @readystack/wp-plugin-review-gate
{
"mcpServers": {
"jmshinhwa-wp-plugin-review-gate": {
"command": "npx",
"args": [
"-y",
"@readystack/wp-plugin-review-gate"
]
}
}
} Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 19 Sept 26 64
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Analysed npm/@readystack/wp-plugin-review-gate@1.0.2
Provenance No attestation
The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.
| Result | No attestation |
|---|---|
| Ecosystem | npm |
Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →
Dependencies 0 packages
| Packages resolved | 0 |
|---|---|
| Tree resolution | Complete |
Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_dir ~57
WP Plugin Review Gate - sweep a folder and return every finding (licence; the full run is free for 7 days)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dir | string | yes | – |
| ext | string | – | optional extension filter, e.g. .html |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_file ~31
WP Plugin Review Gate - run all checks on one file by path (free)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | string | yes | – |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
check_text ~45
WP Plugin Review Gate - run all 21 checks on a text (free)
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | string | – | optional file name for context |
| text | string | yes | file contents |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
What is the io.github.jmshinhwa/wp-plugin-review-gate MCP server?
io.github.jmshinhwa/wp-plugin-review-gate is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.jmshinhwa/wp-plugin-review-gate. The readme.txt and plugin-header lines that send a wordpress.org submission back, found before you s. This page covers its npm package (@readystack/wp-plugin-review-gate).
Is the io.github.jmshinhwa/wp-plugin-review-gate MCP server safe to use?
io.github.jmshinhwa/wp-plugin-review-gate scores 64 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 20 September 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the io.github.jmshinhwa/wp-plugin-review-gate MCP server expose?
io.github.jmshinhwa/wp-plugin-review-gate exposes 3 tools: check_text, check_file, check_dir. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 133 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Is the io.github.jmshinhwa/wp-plugin-review-gate MCP server still maintained?
io.github.jmshinhwa/wp-plugin-review-gate is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.