RugRadar
REMOTE · X402-SELLER-PMLM.ONRENDER.COM
Rug-pull, token-safety and honeypot risk checks for Solana and EVM tokens. $0.01 per call.
Available components
Last scanned (8 hours ago)
Scores higher than 61% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 18 Oct 2026.
Category Crypto and Web3
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security74
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- HSTS check failed: the Strict-Transport-Security header is absent. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability62
- AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 608 tokens (~202/item across 3 items; 3 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management13
- Stability observed for 4 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 3 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 18 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 3 to 7. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 1 days of observed history at the previous scan, 2 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 15 Oct 26 −1
- Tool “honeypot_check” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “rug_check” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Tool “token_safety” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
- Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- 14 Oct 26 70
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 18 Oct 2026 · Probed https://x402-seller-pmlm.onrender.com/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=onrender.com | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 21 Sept 2026 | 20 Dec 2026 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 6eb1e3fe7d0631ea1337bfa4a321c137 |
| SANs: onrender.com, *.onrender.com | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of x402-seller-pmlm.onrender.com. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| com. | present | 19718 | 13 | Verified |
| onrender.com. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://x402-seller-pmlm.onrender.com/mcp | Verified | 200 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://x402-seller-pmlm.onrender.com/mcp | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://x402-seller-pmlm.onrender.com/mcp |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
honeypot_check ~187
RugRadar honeypot check: can I sell this token? Simulated buy/sell and tax on EVM chains, live Jupiter sell quote plus freeze/mint authority and token-2022 transfer controls on Solana; 0-100 risk score. $0.01 per check: 45+ data points per token, including 16 signals RugCheck's free report doesn't show (dev-sold %, sniper and launch-bundle share, a live can-you-sell quote, the creator's past launches, volume vs market cap, bot-trading score), across 5 chains.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| api_key | string | – | optional RugRadar credit key (or send header X-RugRadar-Key) |
| chain | string | – | default solana; 0x addresses default to base |
| token | string | yes | Solana mint or EVM 0x token contract |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
rug_check ~178
RugRadar rug check / rug pull checker: 0-100 risk score with plain reasons and a buyer summary for a token on Solana (incl. pump.fun), BNB, Base, Ethereum or Arbitrum. $0.01 per check: 45+ data points per token, including 16 signals RugCheck's free report doesn't show (dev-sold %, sniper and launch-bundle share, a live can-you-sell quote, the creator's past launches, volume vs market cap, bot-trading score), across 5 chains.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| api_key | string | – | optional RugRadar credit key (or send header X-RugRadar-Key) |
| chain | string | – | default solana; 0x addresses default to base |
| token | string | yes | Solana mint or EVM 0x token contract |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
token_safety ~180
RugRadar token safety check: mint/freeze authority, holder concentration, liquidity, age, deployer history, dev holding/sold, snipers, bundles, volume vs market cap, socials; 0-100 risk score. $0.01 per check: 45+ data points per token, including 16 signals RugCheck's free report doesn't show (dev-sold %, sniper and launch-bundle share, a live can-you-sell quote, the creator's past launches, volume vs market cap, bot-trading score), across 5 chains.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| api_key | string | – | optional RugRadar credit key (or send header X-RugRadar-Key) |
| chain | string | – | default solana; 0x addresses default to base |
| token | string | yes | Solana mint or EVM 0x token contract |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the RugRadar MCP server?
RugRadar is a hosted endpoint at https://x402-seller-pmlm.onrender.com/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · x402-seller-pmlm.onrender.com
claude mcp add --transport http jimmybr-pdx-rugradar 'https://x402-seller-pmlm.onrender.com/mcp'
What is the RugRadar MCP server?
RugRadar is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.jimmybr-PDX/rugradar. Rug-pull, token-safety and honeypot risk checks for Solana and EVM tokens. $0.01 per call. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://x402-seller-pmlm.onrender.com/mcp).
Is the RugRadar MCP server safe to use?
RugRadar scores 71 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the RugRadar MCP server expose?
RugRadar exposes 3 tools: rug_check, token_safety, honeypot_check. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 545 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the RugRadar MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to RugRadar without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the RugRadar MCP server still maintained?
RugRadar is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 18 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.