Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Agent Web Search

PYPI · AGENT-WEB-SEARCH-MCP

Provider-neutral web_search for AI agents. Grounding + agent search APIs, keyless defaults.

0 this week 95 Trust /100

Last scanned (23 hours ago)

Scores higher than 98% of PyPI servers

Category Search and Retrieval

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security100
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Runs setuptools.build_meta at install time, a recognised build step with no custom scripting around it. View diagnostics → Pass
  • 1 of 31 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency97
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to JerryLiu369/agent-web-search). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (MIT).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 12 days ago).Pass
  • Security-disclosure policy not yet verified: we couldn't inspect the source repository.Unverified
Schema Quality & AI Usability76
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 236 tokens (~236/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 1 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 1 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Nov 26 0
    • Security disclosure: fail → unverified ▼ functional
  • 27 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 26 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 −1
    • Stability: pass → 0.93 functional
  • 24 Oct 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 23 Oct 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
    • Package version: 0.8.0 → 0.8.1 functional
  • 17 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.90 → pass security
  • 16 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 87 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 26 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/agent-web-search-mcp@0.8.1

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem pypi
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo JerryLiu369/agent-web-search
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/JerryLiu369/agent-web-search/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/tags/v0.8.1
Rekor log index 3408701332
Predicate type PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1
Subject digest sha256:3dc6fb91afb7704001f5491cd41710192e3d9632fdb59b42414edae4168fac61

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 1 script
Hook Tier Command
build_backend allowlisted setuptools.build_meta

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 31 packages
Packages resolved 31
No linked repository 1
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 1 exposed · ~236 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
web_search ~236

Search the web using agent-native semantic search and LLM-grounding backends. Optimized for complete natural-language questions rather than traditional keyword queries. Enabled providers: DuckDuckGo web search; Exa web search; Parallel LLM-optimized web search. Use a complete natural-language question. Failed providers are omitted from successful responses. If every enabled provider fails, the call returns a tool error with code all_providers_failed and per-provider diagnostics.

NameTypeReqDescription
max_resultsinteger–Desired maximum number of results. Providers enforce this natively or as a best-effort prompt constraint.
providersarray–Optional subset of the providers enabled at startup.
querystringyesA complete, detailed natural-language question or intent. Do NOT use fragmented keyword queries (e.g. avoid 'NVDA earnings'); instead pass the full question (e.g. 'What were the key highlights and ma…
time_rangestring–Optional time filter: past day, week, month, or year.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Agent Web Search MCP server?

Agent Web Search runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx agent-web-search-mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · agent-web-search-mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add jerryliu369-agent-web-search -- uvx agent-web-search-mcp
Common questions

What is the Agent Web Search MCP server?

Agent Web Search is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.JerryLiu369/agent-web-search. Provider-neutral web_search for AI agents. Grounding + agent search APIs, keyless defaults. This page covers its PyPI package (agent-web-search-mcp).

Is the Agent Web Search MCP server safe to use?

Agent Web Search scores 95 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 4 November 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Agent Web Search MCP server expose?

Agent Web Search exposes 1 tool: web_search. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 236 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Agent Web Search MCP server still maintained?

Agent Web Search is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the Agent Web Search MCP server under?

Agent Web Search declares the MIT licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.