Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.jdhart81/regulatory-radar

REMOTE · MCP.VIRIDISCONSERVATION.COM

California, US, and global climate compliance scans with source-linked deadlines.

+7 this week 80 Trust /100

Last scanned (22 hours ago)

Scores higher than 81% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 4 Nov 2026.

Category Health and Science

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security74
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability61
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (fair).Partial
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 562 tokens (~112/item across 5 items; 5 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management97
  • Stability observed for 29 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 5 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 0
    • Tool “assess_compliance” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: 97 → 112 ▼ functional
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
    • “assess_compliance” added an optional parameter “annual_revenue_usd” cosmetic
  • 3 Nov 26 0
    • Tool “assess_compliance” changed its title: Assess compliance cosmetic
    • Tool “build_evidence_pack” changed its title: Build evidence pack cosmetic
    • Tool “describe_agent” changed its title: Describe this service cosmetic
    • Tool “monitor_changes” changed its title: Monitor changes cosmetic
    • Tool “scan_regulations” changed its title: Scan applicable regulations cosmetic

    5 cosmetic changes on this day. Switch on “Show cosmetic changes” to see them.

  • 31 Oct 26 +7
    • Authorization: unverified → partial ▲ security
    • Tool “scan_regulations” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • “scan_regulations” added an optional parameter “query” cosmetic
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • Schema quality: 70 → 93 ▼ functional
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 26 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Aug 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 11 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Probed https://mcp.viridisconservation.com/regulatory-radar/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=mcp.viridisconservation.com CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 7 Sept 2026 6 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 5abb43a3acf241ca07b1eb9ff25cafac4e4
SANs: mcp.viridisconservation.com
CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of mcp.viridisconservation.com. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
com. present 19718 13 Verified
viridisconservation.com. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://mcp.viridisconservation.com/regulatory-radar/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://mcp.viridisconservation.com/regulatory-radar/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://mcp.viridisconservation.com/regulatory-radar/mcp
MCP tools · 5 exposed · ~545 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
assess_compliance ~145

Screen a company's posture against applicable regulations. Returns compliance level, percentage, gaps, and remediation priorities. Size-gated obligations (e.g. California SB 253 at $1B revenue) count only when `annual_revenue_usd` is supplied; without it they are listed under applicability_unconfirmed and the level is "undetermined", never "compliant". Screening only, not legal advice.

NameTypeReqDescription
annual_revenue_usd–––
company_namestringyes–
disclosures–––
jurisdictionstringyes–
payment_ref–––
request_id–––
sectorstringyes–
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

build_evidence_pack ~134

Build a live, source-hashed regulatory change evidence pack. Fetches only the product's registry-owned regulator URLs, reports source retrieval timestamps and SHA-256 hashes, distinguishes a first baseline from a detected change, emits a bounded text diff on later changes, and combines the evidence with a curated deadline calendar. Screening only; confirm legal applicability with the cited authority or qualified counsel.

NameTypeReqDescription
company_profile–––
jurisdictionstringyes–
persist_snapshotboolean––
since_daysinteger––
source_ids–––
topics–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

describe_agent ~19

Fleet-standard self-description: capabilities, inputs, outputs.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

monitor_changes ~98

Watch curated regulatory effective dates and deadlines in a bounded window. `since_days` controls both recently effective dates behind today and effective/deadline dates ahead of today. This is a source-linked watch over the curated Viridis dataset, not a live external regulatory feed.

NameTypeReqDescription
jurisdictionstringyes–
payment_ref–––
request_id–––
since_daysinteger––
topics–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

scan_regulations ~149

Scan a jurisdiction (e.g. EU, US, california, or CA for Canada), optionally filtered by sector and/or a free-text query over regulation names, descriptions and requirements. Returns regulations with urgency flags and effective dates. Price: $0.25 per call after 10 free calls/day. Pay at /x402/regulatory-radar/scan_regulations with Base USDC, cash-fund payment_ref through escrow_checkout + confirm_escrow_funding, or use /seats.

NameTypeReqDescription
jurisdictionstringyes–
payment_ref–––
query–––
request_id–––
sector–––
NameTypeReqDescription
resultstringyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.jdhart81/regulatory-radar MCP server?

io.github.jdhart81/regulatory-radar is a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.viridisconservation.com/regulatory-radar/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · mcp.viridisconservation.com

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http jdhart81-regulatory-radar 'https://mcp.viridisconservation.com/regulatory-radar/mcp'
Common questions

What is the io.github.jdhart81/regulatory-radar MCP server?

io.github.jdhart81/regulatory-radar is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.jdhart81/regulatory-radar. California, US, and global climate compliance scans with source-linked deadlines. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://mcp.viridisconservation.com/regulatory-radar/mcp).

Is the io.github.jdhart81/regulatory-radar MCP server safe to use?

io.github.jdhart81/regulatory-radar scores 80 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.jdhart81/regulatory-radar MCP server expose?

io.github.jdhart81/regulatory-radar exposes 5 tools: scan_regulations, assess_compliance, monitor_changes, build_evidence_pack, describe_agent. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 545 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the io.github.jdhart81/regulatory-radar MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to io.github.jdhart81/regulatory-radar without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the io.github.jdhart81/regulatory-radar MCP server still maintained?

io.github.jdhart81/regulatory-radar is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.