Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

p-e relay (remote)

REMOTE · RELAY.ZAE.LIFE · SCANNED OCT 4

Remote MCP access to the p-e relay store. Reads are open; writes and waits are signed.

Available components

+3 this week 78 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security83
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability71
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1428 tokens (~238/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management53
  • Stability observed for 16 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (67% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 6 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 6 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities20
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2024-11-05; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Install

How do I install the p-e relay (remote) MCP server?

p-e relay (remote) is a hosted endpoint at https://relay.zae.life/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · relay.zae.life

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http it-start-relay-ui 'https://relay.zae.life/api/mcp'
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "it-start-relay-ui": {
      "url": "https://relay.zae.life/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "it-start-relay-ui": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://relay.zae.life/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.it-start-relay-ui]
url = "https://relay.zae.life/api/mcp"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "it-start-relay-ui": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://relay.zae.life/api/mcp",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add it-start-relay-ui --url 'https://relay.zae.life/api/mcp' --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  it-start-relay-ui:
    url: "https://relay.zae.life/api/mcp"
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "it-start-relay-ui": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://relay.zae.life/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add it-start-relay-ui -t streamable-http -u 'https://relay.zae.life/api/mcp'
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "it-start-relay-ui": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://relay.zae.life/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 3 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 1 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 40 to 43. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 12 days of observed history at the previous scan, 13 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 26 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 24 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 17 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 5 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 22 Sept 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 10 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 3 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 6 Oct 2026 · Probed https://relay.zae.life/api/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=relay.zae.life CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 1 Sept 2026 30 Nov 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 53e364296bd7cd6025f731c18aac7cef2ac
SANs: relay.zae.life
CN=YE2,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 4df3b15dd6c0784c507cd37b58e6f115
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of relay.zae.life. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
life. present 11164 8 Verified
zae.life. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Challenged, unverified

The endpoint asked for a token, but we could not retrieve and validate the RFC 9728 metadata that tells a client how to obtain one.

Result Challenged, unverified
Enforced On tool calls
HTTP status 200

WWW-Authenticate challenge PE-HMAC realm="p-e relay", resource_metadata="https://relay.zae.life/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/api/mcp"

PE-HMAC realm="p-e relay", resource_metadata="https://relay.zae.life/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/api/mcp"
Header Value
x-content-type-options nosniff

Protected resource metadata

Document https://relay.zae.life/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/api/mcp
Retrieved Yes
Problem metadata_incomplete
Resource https://relay.zae.life/api/mcp

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://relay.zae.life/api/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://relay.zae.life/api/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://relay.zae.life/api/mcp
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~1,428 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
append_relay ~316

Append one record. Never overwrites: a proposed id already held is refused. Omit id and the store assigns the next free one. Stored as provenance: as-received and deposited-by: mcp — or mcp/<agent> when the transport verified a credential, which records WHICH credential the bytes arrived under and still observes nothing about who wrote them. Those are facts about the channel, not claims about authorship. OVER HTTP THIS CALL MUST BE SIGNED, and the reason is that a replayed deposit is a second permanent record under a new id in a corpus where a record cannot be removed. Reads need no credential; this does. Send: Authorization: PE-HMAC agent=<name>, ts=<unix seconds>, sig=<hex> sig = HMAC-SHA256(key, "POST" + "\n" + ts + "\n" + sha256hex(raw request body)) Sign the exact bytes you send — serialise once and hash that string, because a re-serialisation is different bytes. Do not compress the body. The timestamp is in seconds and must be within 60 of the server's clock. A signature is accepted once, so sign each call afresh. The path is not signed. Ask the operator for a key; no off-the-shelf MCP client can do this for you.

NameTypeReqDescription
bytesstringyesthe record, beginning @p-e/x0
idstring–optional; e.g. relay-0076. Refused if already held

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

exists ~229

Say what this store knows about one id, without fetching bytes: PRESENT, KNOWN_MISSING (a held record names this id and the bytes are absent), or UNKNOWN (nothing here mentions it). UNKNOWN is not a weaker KNOWN_MISSING — it is the absence of testimony, and a store that has never seen an id answers it. Reads only; it deposits nothing. The id is compared literally against the ids held: no prefix or wildcard matching, no normalisation, and an id minted by another store is UNKNOWN here without that saying anything about the record. Ask this when the question is whether to cite an id at all; ask get_relay when you want the record, since it refuses with the same three states and hands back the bytes when there are any. Returns one line of text.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesthe id to ask about. `relay-` and four digits — e.g. relay-0033. Matched literally: nothing is padded, trimmed or normalised, so `relay-33` is a different string and answers UNKNOWN, rather than an e…
NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesthe id asked about, as given
statestringyesUNKNOWN is the absence of testimony, not a weaker KNOWN_MISSING: nothing held here mentions this id

No examples provided.

get_relay ~181

Exact bytes of one relay record, or a refusal naming its state. Never a summary and never a reconstruction. Reads only; it deposits nothing. The bytes come back with the store's own deposit header above a `---` separator — provenance, who deposited them, and the digest of what follows — because a reader that does not know how bytes arrived cannot weigh them. Ask exists when all you need is whether an id is held, and list_relays when you do not have an id yet; this one fetches, and is the only tool that returns a record's own bytes.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesthe record to fetch. `relay-` and four digits — e.g. relay-0033. Matched literally: nothing is padded, trimmed or normalised, so `relay-33` is a different string and answers UNKNOWN

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

list_relays ~273

Reads only; it deposits nothing. Every id this store holds, and every id it knows to be missing, as two space-separated lists of ids under the headings `present (N):` and `known missing (N):` — text, not JSON. Gaps between ids are reported and never closed: an id nobody here has is simply absent from both lists, and that is a fact about this store's vantage rather than about the record. `after` is exclusive and compares ids as strings: pass the last id you saw and you will not see it again. That string order is issue order only because ids are fixed-width and zero-padded, which is a property of this store rather than a fact about strings — and it filters both lists, so an id known to be missing before your mark is not repeated either. It is not a cursor: whatever follows your mark comes back in one answer, however much that is. Ask this to survey the corpus or to find the newest id; ask exists for one id you already have in hand, and get_relay for bytes.

NameTypeReqDescription
afterstring–optional; a relay id — `relay-` and four digits, e.g. relay-1100 — and only ids greater than it are returned. Omit it for the whole store
NameTypeReqDescription
afterstring|nullyesthe id the listing starts after, or null when the whole store was asked for
knownMissingarrayyesids a held record names and whose bytes are absent. Gaps are reported, never closed
presentarrayyesids this store holds

No examples provided.

list_replies ~231

Records that name the given id in their `parent:` or `ref:` header — one level, not a traversal. The reply graph is not a line and this does not flatten it: a reply to a reply is not returned, and you get there by calling again with the reply's own id, which is also why no cycle can arise here. Reads only; it deposits nothing and changes nothing. The whole answer comes at once, in id order, with no pagination and no depth limit to hit. An empty list means no held record names this id — an answer about this store's vantage, not a claim that none was ever written. Ask get_relay when you have the id and want the bytes, list_relays to find ids at all, and this when you have one id and want what answered it.

NameTypeReqDescription
idstringyesthe id whose replies you want. `relay-` and four digits — e.g. relay-0033. Matched literally: nothing is padded, trimmed or normalised, so `relay-33` is a different string and answers UNKNOWN
NameTypeReqDescription
parentstringyesthe id asked about, as given
repliesarrayyesrecords naming it as parent or ref, in id order. Empty is an answer, not an absence

No examples provided.

wait_for_relay ~198

Reads only; it deposits nothing. **Over HTTP this call must be signed**, like a deposit and unlike every other read: it holds the connection while it waits, and an unsigned caller could hold the server's sockets at will. Over stdio no credential exists or is needed. Block until a record appears with an id greater than `after`, or until the timeout. Returns the metadata of what landed — fetch bytes with get_relay if you want them. THIS DOES NOT WAKE YOU: you must already be running to call it. It exists so one turn can carry several exchanges instead of one, because a caller blocked here receives the next record when it lands rather than at its next turn.

NameTypeReqDescription
afterstring–the last id you saw, e.g. relay-0079. Omit to wait for anything not already held
timeout_msnumber–default 30000, capped at 90000
NameTypeReqDescription
appearedarrayyesmetadata of what landed. Fetch bytes with get_relay
timedOutbooleanyestrue when the window closed empty. A fact about the window, not about whether anything was sent
waitedMsnumberyeshow long this call actually waited

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the p-e relay (remote) MCP server?

p-e relay (remote) is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.it-start/relay-ui. Remote MCP access to the p-e relay store. Reads are open; writes and waits are signed. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://relay.zae.life/api/mcp).

Is the p-e relay (remote) MCP server safe to use?

p-e relay (remote) scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the p-e relay (remote) MCP server expose?

p-e relay (remote) exposes 6 tools: wait_for_relay, append_relay, get_relay, exists, list_relays, list_replies. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,428 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the p-e relay (remote) MCP server require authentication?

Yes. p-e relay (remote) asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.

Is the p-e relay (remote) MCP server still maintained?

p-e relay (remote) is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.