Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

CLIO Arxiv

PYPI · CLIO-KIT

Search arXiv by topic, author, title or date, read paper details, and export BibTeX or PDFs.

Available components

0 this week 48 Trust /100

Last scanned (16 hours ago)

Scores higher than 46% of PyPI servers

Category Education and Research

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security94
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • No known CVEs affecting this package version or its production dependencies.Pass
  • Declares code that runs automatically (build-time code we could not rule out (a Hatch, PDM or setuptools build hook, a dynamic version we could not read statically, shipped VCS metadata or a stray root module)) and that we could not recognise. It may be perfectly ordinary, but we have not established what it does. View diagnostics → Partial
  • 0 of 4 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Pass
Provenance & Transparency97
  • Source repository is publicly reachable at the declared URL. View diagnostics → Pass
  • Cryptographically verified build provenance (signed, bound to iowarp/clio-kit). View diagnostics → Pass
  • Clear OSI-approved license (BSD-3-Clause).Pass
  • Actively maintained (last published 6 days ago).Pass
  • Disclosure check failed: no security disclosure policy was found in the source repository. See how to fix → Fail
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
  • Schema quality not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to assess.Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to compare.Unverified
Tool Coverage0
  • Tool coverage not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool definitions to assess.Unverified
Tool Safety0
  • Tool safety not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool text to scan.Unverified
Capabilities0
  • Protocol version not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we never saw its MCP handshake.Unverified

Unverified: 5 categories

Categories scored 0 because our sandbox has not given us the schema these checks need to read. That is a gap on our side rather than a finding about the package, and we only credit what we can confirm, so the score stands at 0 until the capture succeeds. We are working through the fleet, so this normally clears without any action from you. How we score packages →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 4 Nov 26 +15
    • Malware scan: unverified → pass ▲ security
  • 3 Nov 26 −15
    • Malware scan: pass → unverified ▼ security
  • 29 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: Stability not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to compare. security
    • Tool safety: Tool safety not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool text to scan. security
    • Schema quality: Schema quality not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to assess. functional
    • Capabilities: Protocol version not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we never saw its MCP handshake. functional
    • Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool definitions to assess. functional
  • 28 Oct 26 0
    • Tool safety: Tool safety not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the tool definitions this version of the package serves yet. security
    • Stability: Stability not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet. security
    • Capabilities: Protocol version not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP handshake this version of the package performs yet. functional
    • Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the tool definitions this version of the package serves yet. functional
    • Schema quality: Schema quality not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet. functional
    • Package version: 2.11.0 → 2.11.1 functional
  • 14 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: Stability not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to compare. security
    • Tool safety: Tool safety not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool text to scan. security
    • Schema quality: Schema quality not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no schema to assess. functional
    • Capabilities: Protocol version not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we never saw its MCP handshake. functional
    • Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: this package installed, but its server did not start, so we have no tool definitions to assess. functional
  • 12 Oct 26 −1
    • Install scripts: pass → partial ▼ security
    • Tool safety: Tool safety not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the tool definitions this version of the package serves yet. security
    • Stability: Stability not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet. security
    • The code this package runs automatically changed: its declared build backend → build-time code we could not rule out (a Hatch, PDM or setuptools build hook, a dynamic version we could not read statically, shipped VCS metadata or a stray root module) security
    • Capabilities: Protocol version not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP handshake this version of the package performs yet. functional
    • Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the tool definitions this version of the package serves yet. functional
    • Schema quality: Schema quality not yet verified: we do not have a sandbox capture of the MCP schema this version of the package serves yet. functional
    • Package version: 2.2.3 → 2.11.0 functional
  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 4 Nov 2026 · Analysed pypi/clio-kit@2.11.1

Provenance Verified

A signed build attestation was found and verified, binding this exact artifact to the source repository it claims to come from.

Result Verified
Ecosystem pypi
Reason Verified
Discovered via Registry attestation endpoint
Source repo iowarp/clio-kit
Certificate issuer https://token.actions.githubusercontent.com
Certificate SAN https://github.com/iowarp/clio-kit/.github/workflows/publish.yml@refs/tags/v2.11.1
Rekor log index 3549512838
Predicate type PyPI publish attestation https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/publish/v1
Subject digest sha256:3f9c160867f9c1697b1fcc24ae88e4e454dc857dbede66192b9dea9a3d8f44a0

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Install scripts 2 scripts
Hook Tier Command
build_backend allowlisted hatchling.build
build_hook unreviewed tool.hatch.build.hooks.custom

Background: Why install scripts are a supply-chain risk →

Dependencies 4 packages
Packages resolved 4
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tools for package channels are captured by running the package in an isolated sandbox. The most recent sandbox run could not capture a tool list from this package.

Install

How do I install the CLIO Arxiv MCP server?

CLIO Arxiv runs locally as a PyPI package, launched with uvx clio-kit. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

pypi · clio-kit

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add iowarp-arxiv-mcp -- uvx clio-kit
Common questions

What is the CLIO Arxiv MCP server?

CLIO Arxiv is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.iowarp/arxiv-mcp. Search arXiv by topic, author, title or date, read paper details, and export BibTeX or PDFs. This page covers its PyPI package (clio-kit).

Is the CLIO Arxiv MCP server safe to use?

CLIO Arxiv scores 48 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We found no known CVEs affecting it as of 4 November 2026. Its build provenance is signed and verified. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

Is the CLIO Arxiv MCP server still maintained?

CLIO Arxiv is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 4 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the CLIO Arxiv MCP server under?

CLIO Arxiv declares the BSD-3-Clause licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.