Songlinks
REMOTE · SONGLINKS.IO
Find the songwriter behind a name or IPI name number, under every spelling and number.
Available components
Last scanned (15 hours ago)
Scores higher than 62% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 24 Oct 2026.
Category Entertainment and Games
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security69
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- No authorisation is required to call this server. Every tool declares its destructiveHint and none is destructive, so open access doesn't expose one. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Partial
- HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 403, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability100
- Verified streamable-http transport via a live MCP handshake. View diagnostics → Pass
Schema Quality & AI Usability66
- AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
- Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1066 tokens (~266/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
- Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management30
- Stability observed for 9 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
- 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
- 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
- No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
- We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
- An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
- Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 24 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 22 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 23. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 7 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 20 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 18 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 16 Oct 26 +1
- Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
- Server version: 0.10.0 → 0.11.0 functional
- 15 Oct 26 67
First indexed and scored.
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 24 Oct 2026 · Probed https://songlinks.io/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=songlinks.io | CN=Amazon RSA 2048 M04,O=Amazon,C=US | 15 Sept 2026 | 31 Mar 2027 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 8ed4f64f6533bcecc87226d167daa64 |
| SANs: songlinks.io, www.songlinks.to, songlinks.to, www.songlinks.io | ||||||
| CN=Amazon RSA 2048 M04,O=Amazon,C=US (CA) | CN=Amazon Root CA 1,O=Amazon,C=US | 23 Aug 2022 | 23 Aug 2030 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 773124f2a952e3ed18a58bdb85d1bc0ce5f27 |
| CN=Amazon Root CA 1,O=Amazon,C=US (CA) | CN=Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2,O=Starfield Technologies\, Inc.,L=Scottsdale,ST=Arizona,C=US | 25 May 2015 | 31 Dec 2037 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 67f944a2a27cdf3fac2ae2b01f908eeb9c4c6 |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of songlinks.io. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| io. | present | 38690, 57355 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| songlinks.io. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication No authorisation required
The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.
| Result | No authorisation required |
|---|---|
| HTTP status | 200 |
| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000 |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://songlinks.io/mcp | Verified | 400 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://songlinks.io/mcp | Inconclusive | 403 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
check_writers Check a list of songwriters by IPI name number ~123
Use when the user has several IPI name numbers, such as the writers on a song, a catalogue or a registration file, and wants to know who each one is, or whether some of a writer's works sit under another spelling or number. Up to 50 numbers per call. For each: the person holding it, their registered names, works in total and on their main number, works_elsewhere (registered only under another spelling or number), and a person_url.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ipi_name_numbers | array | yes | Up to 50 IPI name numbers |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
find_songwriter Find a songwriter by name ~394
Use when the user names a songwriter or composer and wants to know who they are, which person a name belongs to, or every registration of that writer. Returns the persons the name could be: each with a person ID, the names and IPI name numbers they are registered under, how many works, and a person_url to cite. Pairs listed under possibly_the_same_person were held apart and are not merged; `why` says why. Candidates are this lookup's own grouping, made afresh for the name, and can differ from the stored person that get_songwriter and the person page describe: a candidate can include records with no IPI name number that the stored person lists apart, and two candidates can carry the same person_id when this lookup keeps apart records the stored person joined. Each record's person_id is the stored person it belongs to, or null; person_records is how many records that person holds, and records_not_in_this_answer how many of them this candidate does not, because they sit in another candidate or outside this lookup. For a person's registrations as they stand, call get_songwriter. A candidate's works counts every record in it, records held apart from the person included; the person's own count is get_songwriter's works.total. Registrations are under legal names: a writer known by a professional or stage name may not be found by it. If the writer you expect is not among the candidates, or song_match.match is none, try their legal name. truncated means more registrations matched than one answer groups: a fuller name narrows it. Give a song title they wrote, when known, to say which of several namesakes wrote it. A one-word name is not searched: ask for the full name.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | The songwriter's full name, as registered or as commonly written |
| song | – | – | Optional: the title of a song they wrote |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
get_songwriter Get a songwriter by person ID ~253
Use when you have a Songlinks person ID (SLP-XXXX-XXXX-X), from find_songwriter or a person page, and the user wants that writer's details: the registrations grouped into the person, records listed apart as possibly the same person, and their first works. Each record says how it was joined: `main` marks the record the ID was issued on, and `rule` is the evidence: same_ipi (another of the person's records carries the same IPI name number), ipi (it carries the person's own number), model (judged the same writer from works, co-writers and publishers in common; `score` is how sure), corroborated (confirmed by an independent source) or verdict (decided by a person). At most 25 works are listed; works.total is the full count and the person page lists the rest. works.ordered_by is `recordings` when the list starts with the most-recorded works, and `coded` when it is in catalogue-code order: then it is a sample, not the writer's best-known songs.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| person_id | string | yes | A Songlinks person ID, SLP-XXXX-XXXX-X |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
songwriter_by_ipi Find a songwriter by IPI name number ~110
Use when the user has an IPI name number (up to 11 digits, often written without its leading zeros) and wants to know which songwriter holds it. Returns the person or persons holding the number, each with a person ID and person_url; use get_songwriter for one person's details. `none` means no person here holds it: it may be a publisher's number, or one whose registrations have not been grouped.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| ipi_name_number | – | yes | One IPI name number |
No output schema declared.
No examples provided.
How do I install the Songlinks MCP server?
Songlinks is a hosted endpoint at https://songlinks.io/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · songlinks.io
claude mcp add --transport http io-songlinks-songlinks 'https://songlinks.io/mcp'
What is the Songlinks MCP server?
Songlinks is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.songlinks/songlinks. Find the songwriter behind a name or IPI name number, under every spelling and number. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://songlinks.io/mcp).
Is the Songlinks MCP server safe to use?
Songlinks scores 72 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Songlinks MCP server expose?
Songlinks exposes 4 tools: find_songwriter, get_songwriter, songwriter_by_ipi, check_writers. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 880 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Songlinks MCP server require authentication?
No. We connected to Songlinks without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.
Is the Songlinks MCP server still maintained?
Songlinks is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 24 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.