Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Launchpad HQ

REMOTE · WWW.LAUNCHPADHQ.IO

Read-only, sourced and dated facts on AI tools: search, compare, pricing, free alternatives.

+3 this week 78 Trust /100

Last scanned (3 hours ago)

Scores higher than 76% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category AI and Machine Learning

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 518 tokens (~129/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management33
  • Stability observed for 10 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 5 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 30 to 33. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 9 days of observed history at the previous scan, 10 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 23 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 7 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 31 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 17. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 5 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 10. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 3 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 28 Oct 26 +1
    • Tool “search_tools” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: pass → fail ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 89% → 100% ▲ functional
    • “search_tools” reworded the description of “budget” cosmetic
    • “search_tools” reworded the description of “platform_type” cosmetic
    • “search_tools” reworded the description of “task” cosmetic
  • 27 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
    • Server version: 0.1.1 → 0.1.2 functional
  • 26 Oct 26 73

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.launchpadhq.io/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=www.launchpadhq.io CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 14 Oct 2026 12 Jan 2027 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 576110f1be7f9cf6a161e6452ef57e94edd
SANs: www.launchpadhq.io
CN=YR1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA a20253f15f2691c05dc1ce13b9bcca4e
CN=Root YR,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA f24b6d17f9d9ad7cb1c9fea78782699f

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of www.launchpadhq.io. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
io. present 38690 8 Verified
launchpadhq.io. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=63072000
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://www.launchpadhq.io/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://www.launchpadhq.io/mcp HTTPS enforced 308 https://www.launchpadhq.io/mcp
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~417 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
compare ~66

Use this when the user wants to compare 2 to 4 specific AI tools side by side: plans, API pricing, usage limits and platforms, each with its own as_of date and source.

NameTypeReqDescription
platformsarrayyes2-4 Launchpad HQ platform slugs or names.
NameTypeReqDescription
attributionstringyes–
data_as_ofstring|nullyes–
did_you_meanarray––
itemsarrayyes–
not_foundarrayyes–

No examples provided.

find_free_alternatives ~76

Use this when the user wants a free or freemium alternative to a specific AI tool. Verified free tiers rank first; catalog-only matches are labeled unverified.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger–Max alternatives (1-10, default 5).
platformstringyesA Launchpad HQ platform slug or name.
NameTypeReqDescription
alternativesarrayyes–
attributionstringyes–
data_as_ofstring|nullyes–
for–yes–

No examples provided.

get_pricing_facts ~63

Use this when the user asks what one AI tool costs or what its free tier includes. Returns verified pricing facts first; catalog text only when no verified price exists, labeled catalog_only.

NameTypeReqDescription
platformstringyesA Launchpad HQ platform slug or name.
NameTypeReqDescription
api_pricing–yes–
attributionstringyes–
catalog_pricing_textstring|nullyes–
data_as_ofstring|nullyes–
free_tier–yes–
lifecyclestringyes–
plans–yes–
platformobjectyes–
usage_limits–yes–
verificationstringyes–

No examples provided.

search_tools ~212

Use this when the user wants to find AI tools for a task, optionally within a budget, skill level or platform. Returns Launchpad HQ catalog matches with dated, sourced free-tier facts where available. Items with fallback: true are popular tools, not direct matches; stale: true means the facts are over 90 days old.

NameTypeReqDescription
budgetstring–Budget band. 'free' keeps only free or freemium tools; 'low' keeps free/freemium tools or a lowest paid plan up to $20/month, 'medium' up to $50/month (unknown prices rank lower).
limitinteger–Max results (1-10, default 5).
platform_typestring–Tools available there rank first.
skill_levelstring–User's skill level. Tools above it rank lower.
taskstringyesWhat the user wants to do, e.g. 'transcribe meetings' or 'make slides'. Only the first 200 characters are searched.
NameTypeReqDescription
attributionstringyes–
corrected_querystring|null––
data_as_ofstring|nullyes–
fallback–––
notestring|nullyes–
querystringyes–
resultsarrayyes–
total_matchesintegeryes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Launchpad HQ MCP server?

Launchpad HQ is a hosted endpoint at https://www.launchpadhq.io/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · www.launchpadhq.io

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http io-launchpadhq-launchpad-hq 'https://www.launchpadhq.io/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Launchpad HQ MCP server?

Launchpad HQ is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.launchpadhq/launchpad-hq. Read-only, sourced and dated facts on AI tools: search, compare, pricing, free alternatives. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.launchpadhq.io/mcp).

Is the Launchpad HQ MCP server safe to use?

Launchpad HQ scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Launchpad HQ MCP server expose?

Launchpad HQ exposes 4 tools: search_tools, compare, get_pricing_facts, find_free_alternatives. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 417 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Launchpad HQ MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Launchpad HQ without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Launchpad HQ MCP server still maintained?

Launchpad HQ is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.