I Hate Invoicing
REMOTE · WWW.IHATEINVOICING.IO
Send invoices from Claude and ChatGPT. One sentence becomes a PDF with a Stripe payment link.
Available components
Last scanned (6 hours ago)
Scores higher than 18% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Finance and Payments
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security86
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- The endpoint enforces authorisation, advertised via RFC 9728 protected-resource metadata. View diagnostics → Pass
- HTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement. View diagnostics → Unverified
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC is configured correctly; the domain's records validate against the full chain to the root. View diagnostics → Pass
- The authorisation server offers only Dynamic Client Registration (RFC 7591), which MCP 2026-07-28 deprecated in favour of Client ID Metadata Documents. View diagnostics → Partial
Transport & Reachability0
- Transport blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to verify streamable-http. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read it. See how to fix → Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read its tools.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read its tools.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Capabilities blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read them. See how to fix → Unverified
Unverified: 6 categories
Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm. Claim this server and supply a read-only token to verify it and lift the score.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 15 Oct 26 −4
- HTTPS: pass → unverified ▼ security
- DNSSEC: fail → pass ▲ security
- 9 Oct 26 −1
- DNSSEC: pass → fail ▼ security
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 5 Sept 26 0
- Transport: fail → unverified ▼ security
- Authorization: unverified → pass ▲ security
- DNSSEC: unverified → pass ▲ security
- TLS certificate: unverified → pass ▲ security
- HSTS header: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Tool safety: Tool safety blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read its tools. security
- Tool coverage: Tool coverage blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read its tools. functional
- Schema quality: Schema blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read it. functional
- Capabilities: Capabilities blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read them. functional
- 4 Sept 26 0
- Transport: unverified → fail ▼ security
- Authorization: pass → unverified ▼ security
- TLS certificate: pass → unverified ▼ security
- HSTS header: pass → unverified ▼ security
- DNSSEC: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Tool safety: Tool safety not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list. security
- Tool coverage: Tool coverage not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's tools, or could read only part of the list. functional
- Capabilities: Capabilities not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's capabilities. functional
- Schema quality: Schema not yet verified: we couldn't read the endpoint's schema, or could read only part of its tool list. functional
- 26 Aug 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 24 Aug 26 0
- Transport: fail → unverified ▼ security
- Authorization: unverified → pass ▲ security
- TLS certificate: unverified → pass ▲ security
- HSTS header: unverified → pass ▲ security
- Tool coverage: Tool coverage blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read its tools. functional
- Schema quality: Schema blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read it. functional
- Capabilities: Capabilities blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read them. functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://www.ihateinvoicing.io/api/mcp
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=ihateinvoicing.io | CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 14 Oct 2026 | 12 Jan 2027 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA256 | 713e21a350e525b813b29c756840e5d0 |
| SANs: ihateinvoicing.io, www.ihateinvoicing.io, *.www.ihateinvoicing.io | ||||||
| CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | ECDSA 256 | ECDSA-SHA384 | 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3 |
| CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 15 Nov 2023 | 28 Jan 2028 | ECDSA 384 | SHA256-RSA | 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC secure
Validation of www.ihateinvoicing.io. — Secure
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| io. | present | 38690 | 8 | Verified |
| ihateinvoicing.io. | present | 2371 | 13 | Verified |
| www.ihateinvoicing.io. | Verified address RRset verified with the apex keys |
Authentication Enforced and verified
The endpoint asked for a token and published valid RFC 9728 metadata describing how to get one.
| Result | Enforced and verified |
|---|---|
| Enforced | On connection |
| HTTP status | 401 |
WWW-Authenticate challenge Bearer realm="I Hate Invoicing", resource_metadata="https://www.ihateinvoicing.io/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource"
Bearer realm="I Hate Invoicing", resource_metadata="https://www.ihateinvoicing.io/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource"| Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| content-security-policy | default-src 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'self'; script-src 'self' 'nonce-XTKcLxExY1hMjBBH+E4Yhw==' 'strict-dynamic' https://js.stripe.com; style-src 'self' 'nonce-XTKcLxExY1hMjBBH+E4Yhw=='; style-src-attr 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data: https:; font-src 'self' data:; connect-src 'self' https://wlvvxqypvfpcjllmfosk.supabase.co wss://wlvvxqypvfpcjllmfosk.supabase.co https://api.stripe.com https://js.stripe.com https://*.sentry.io https://us.i.posthog.com https://us-assets.i.posthog.com; frame-src https://js.stripe.com https://checkout.stripe.com https://billing.stripe.com; form-action 'self' https://www.ihateinvoicing.io https://claude.ai https://chatgpt.com https://chat.openai.com https://checkout.stripe.com https://billing.stripe.com; manifest-src 'self'; worker-src 'self' blob: |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | SAMEORIGIN |
| referrer-policy | origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | camera=(), microphone=(self), geolocation=() |
| www-authenticate | Bearer realm="I Hate Invoicing", resource_metadata="https://www.ihateinvoicing.io/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource" |
Protected resource metadata
| Document | https://www.ihateinvoicing.io/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource |
|---|---|
| Retrieved | Yes |
| Resource | https://www.ihateinvoicing.io/api/mcp |
| Authorisation server | https://www.ihateinvoicing.io |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://www.ihateinvoicing.io/api/mcp | Auth required | 401 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://www.ihateinvoicing.io/api/mcp | Inconclusive | 405 |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
No tool schema has been captured from this endpoint yet.
How do I install the I Hate Invoicing MCP server?
I Hate Invoicing is a hosted endpoint at https://www.ihateinvoicing.io/api/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · www.ihateinvoicing.io
claude mcp add --transport http io-ihateinvoicing-ihateinvoicing 'https://www.ihateinvoicing.io/api/mcp'
What is the I Hate Invoicing MCP server?
I Hate Invoicing is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.ihateinvoicing/ihateinvoicing. Send invoices from Claude and ChatGPT. One sentence becomes a PDF with a Stripe payment link. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://www.ihateinvoicing.io/api/mcp).
Is the I Hate Invoicing MCP server safe to use?
I Hate Invoicing scores 34 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
Does the I Hate Invoicing MCP server require authentication?
Yes. I Hate Invoicing asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.
Is the I Hate Invoicing MCP server still maintained?
I Hate Invoicing is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.