Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.engineeringleaders/elc-partnership-builder

REMOTE · WWW.ENGINEERINGLEADERS.IO · SCANNED AUG 15

Build and price an ELC community partnership: match, customize, 12-month plan, 16% AI discount.

+11 this week 74 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (6 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score →

Endpoint Security80
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability77
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 836 tokens (~139/item across 6 items; 6 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management11
  • Stability check failed: schema churn in the 7 days we've observed: 0 tool removals, 1 breaking changes, 0 auth/transport breaks, 1 additions. See how to fix → Fail
Tool Coverage96
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 87% of tool parameters carry a description.Partial
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Install

Add this component to your MCP client. Where a client-specific snippet is available, pick your client below and copy it straight into your config; otherwise use the connection detail shown.

remote · www.engineeringleaders.io

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http io-engineeringleaders-elc-partnership-builder https://www.engineeringleaders.io/mcp/partnership
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.io-engineeringleaders-elc-partnership-builder]
url = "https://www.engineeringleaders.io/mcp/partnership"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "io-engineeringleaders-elc-partnership-builder": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://www.engineeringleaders.io/mcp/partnership",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add io-engineeringleaders-elc-partnership-builder --url https://www.engineeringleaders.io/mcp/partnership --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  io-engineeringleaders-elc-partnership-builder:
    url: "https://www.engineeringleaders.io/mcp/partnership"
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "io-engineeringleaders-elc-partnership-builder": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://www.engineeringleaders.io/mcp/partnership"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 15 Aug 26 +8
    • HSTS header: fail → pass security
    • HTTPS: fail → pass security
  • 13 Aug 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 1 to 4.

  • 11 Aug 26 +1
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 10 Aug 26 0
    • Stability: 0.03 → fail security
    • A breaking change shipped without a version bump: still 1.0.0 security
    • Schema quality: 684 → 836 functional
    • “request_offer” added a required parameter “final_price_confirmed”, so existing callers break functional
    • Schema quality: good → excellent functional
    • New tool “book_intro_call” functional
    • “request_offer” added an optional parameter “visibility_interest” cosmetic
  • 9 Aug 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 functional
  • 8 Aug 26 63

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 15 Aug 2026 · Probed https://www.engineeringleaders.io/mcp/partnership

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=engineeringleaders.io CN=WR1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 21 Jul 2026 19 Oct 2026 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA de31ff2a0dd798940dd53158b47e5376
SANs: engineeringleaders.io, www.engineeringleaders.io
CN=WR1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 7fd9e2c2d2048a0474b627a26d0868a7
CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 19 Jun 2020 28 Jan 2028 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA 77bd0d6cdb36f91aea210fc4f058d30d
DNSSEC insecure

Validation of www.engineeringleaders.io. Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
io. present 57355 8 Verified
engineeringleaders.io. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains
x-content-type-options nosniff
Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://www.engineeringleaders.io/mcp/partnership Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://www.engineeringleaders.io/mcp/partnership HTTPS enforced 301 https://www.engineeringleaders.io/mcp/partnership
MCP tools · 6 exposed · ~836 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability.

Tool Tokens
book_intro_call ~74

The second legitimate ending besides request_offer: a direct booking link for a 1:1 intro meeting with Marian Kamenistak, ELC's founder. Offer it whenever the visitor hesitates, wants a human, or the package needs tailoring beyond the catalog. No contact details collected here — the booking page handles everything.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

customize_package ~120

The conversational toggle board. Pass the preset and the item ids currently ON; returns the recomputed total (never trust your own arithmetic — this is the authoritative price), every selected item with its price, and what else this tier could add. Items marked foundation anchor the package; advise keeping them. Call again after every change the visitor asks for. Next: request_offer.

NameTypeReqDescription
item_idsarrayyesItem ids currently toggled ON (from match_package default_item_ids, plus/minus changes)
preset_idstringyesThe package being customized

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

design_journey ~157

The moment the package becomes a year: deterministic month-by-month plan of what lands when, computed from the basket's own scheduling metadata (lead times, anchors like the April 2027 conference, spacing, and heavy-event collision rules). Returns placed months, the recurring-every-month layer, and anything unplaceable WITH its reason. The plan contains ONLY items in the basket — narrate around it, never add or move an event. Call after customize_package, before request_offer.

NameTypeReqDescription
item_idsarrayyesThe basket: item ids toggled ON
preset_idstringyes
start_monthstringyesFirst partnership month, YYYY-MM (ask the visitor; default to the month after the current one)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_partnership_options ~82

START HERE for any company considering an ELC partnership or membership (personas: HR, CTO, employer branding). Returns how company membership works, real community reach figures, and the two qualifying questions with their valid answers. Companies only — individuals seeking a mentor for themselves get pointed to /mentor/ instead. After the visitor answers both questions, call match_package.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

match_package ~129

Resolves goal + budget through ELC's own routing matrix — the same one the website uses — and returns the matched package(s) with real prices and their default line items. Map free-text answers to the closest valid id; on bad input the error lists the valid ids, re-ask rather than guessing. Next: customize_package to toggle line items, or request_offer to send it as-is.

NameTypeReqDescription
budgetstringyesOne of the budget ids from get_partnership_options question_2
goalstringyesOne of the goal ids from get_partnership_options question_1

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

request_offer ~274

The ONLY tool that collects contact details, and the step that makes the AI-channel discount real. Sends the itemized offer to the visitor's email, notifies Marian (email + Slack), and files the company into ELC's partners queue. Ask for name, work email and company only when the visitor says they want the offer — never earlier. After success: share the confirmation, then make ONE optional ask: would they post publicly (LinkedIn/X) about building their partnership with AI? Optional means optional — the discount is already theirs.

NameTypeReqDescription
companystringyesCompany name
emailstringyesWork email the offer goes to
final_price_confirmedbooleanyesREQUIRED TRUE: set only after the visitor has seen and explicitly confirmed the exact final total (the discounted figure if the discount applies). Sending without this confirmation is refused.
item_idsarrayyesThe final basket: item ids toggled ON
kpisstringOptional: what they need to move this year, in their words
namestringyesVisitor's full name
preset_idstringyes
visibility_intereststringFrom the discovery question: do they want to invest in their visibility through the cooperation — as a company, through individual leaders, or stay quiet?

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.