Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

ReciboPro Invoices

REMOTE · RECIBOPRO.ELEVAREDIGITAL.IO

Create invoices from your AI assistant in 6 languages and 10 currencies, ready for WhatsApp.

+4 this week 78 Trust /100

Last scanned (19 hours ago)

Scores higher than 79% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 16 Oct 2026.

Category Finance and Payments

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security89
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability72
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 212 tokens (~106/item across 2 items; 2 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management40
  • Stability observed for 12 of 30 days with no destabilising changes; credit accrues until the full window elapses.Partial
Tool Coverage67
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities60
  • Spec-recency check failed: implements MCP spec 2025-06-18; the latest is 2026-07-28. See how to fix → Fail
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 15 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 33 to 37. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 10 days of observed history at the previous scan, 11 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 13 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 27 to 30. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 8 days of observed history at the previous scan, 9 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 20 to 27. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 6 days of observed history at the previous scan, 8 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 10 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 13 to 20. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 4 days of observed history at the previous scan, 6 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 8 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 7 to 13. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 2 days of observed history at the previous scan, 4 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 6 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: unverified → 0.07 ▲ functional
  • 4 Oct 26 72

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 16 Oct 2026 · Probed https://recibopro.elevaredigital.io/api/public/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=recibopro.elevaredigital.io CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 4 Oct 2026 2 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 bfe6ef01ef31fe350ed5a368d014903e
SANs: recibopro.elevaredigital.io
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of recibopro.elevaredigital.io. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
io. present 57355 8 Verified
elevaredigital.io. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication Challenged, unverified

The endpoint asked for a token, but we could not retrieve and validate the RFC 9728 metadata that tells a client how to obtain one.

Result Challenged, unverified
Enforced On tool calls
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
x-content-type-options nosniff
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin

Protected resource metadata

Retrieved No
Problem no_resource_metadata

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://recibopro.elevaredigital.io/api/public/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://recibopro.elevaredigital.io/api/public/mcp HTTPS enforced 301 https://recibopro.elevaredigital.io/api/public/mcp
MCP tools · 2 exposed · ~166 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
create_invoice_draft ~146

Builds an invoice draft from details the user stated and returns a private link where they review it and send it themselves (e.g. on WhatsApp). Never sends anything. Only use prices, taxes and client details the user gave. Links, bank/tax-authority/payment-brand names are not allowed.

NameTypeReqDescription
business_namestring––
client_emailstring––
client_namestring––
client_phonestring––
currencystring––
due_datestring––
itemsarrayyes–
languagestring––
notesstring––
tax_ratenumber––

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_supported_options ~20

Lists the currencies and invoice languages ReciboPro supports.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the ReciboPro Invoices MCP server?

ReciboPro Invoices is a hosted endpoint at https://recibopro.elevaredigital.io/api/public/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · recibopro.elevaredigital.io

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http io-elevaredigital-recibopro 'https://recibopro.elevaredigital.io/api/public/mcp'
Common questions

What is the ReciboPro Invoices MCP server?

ReciboPro Invoices is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.elevaredigital/recibopro. Create invoices from your AI assistant in 6 languages and 10 currencies, ready for WhatsApp. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://recibopro.elevaredigital.io/api/public/mcp).

Is the ReciboPro Invoices MCP server safe to use?

ReciboPro Invoices scores 78 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the ReciboPro Invoices MCP server expose?

ReciboPro Invoices exposes 2 tools: create_invoice_draft, get_supported_options. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 166 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the ReciboPro Invoices MCP server require authentication?

Yes. ReciboPro Invoices asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.

Is the ReciboPro Invoices MCP server still maintained?

ReciboPro Invoices is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 16 October 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.