Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.inkog-io/inkog

NPM · @INKOG-IO/MCP

Security co-pilot for AI agents. Scan for vulnerabilities, audit MCP servers, verify governance.

Available components

0 this week 79 Trust /100

Last scanned (9 hours ago)

Scores higher than 61% of npm servers

Category Security

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security81
  • No malware found by supply-chain analysis.Pass
  • CVE check failed: a known high-severity CVE affects zod 3.25.76, a direct dependency. A fixed version is available. View diagnostics → Fail
  • No install/post-install scripts declared.Pass
  • 30 of 96 dependencies flagged as unhealthy. View diagnostics → Partial
Provenance & Transparency45
Schema Quality & AI Usability78
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 921 tokens (~131/item across 7 items; 7 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 7 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 7 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 5 Nov 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 4 Nov 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 97. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 28 days of observed history at the previous scan, 29 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 3 Nov 26 −1
    • Stability: pass → 0.93 functional
  • 31 Oct 26 0
    • CVE-2026-118764 affects this package: high ▼ security
  • 28 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 27 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 24 Oct 26 −5
    • CVE-2023-54404 affects this package: high ▼ security
    • Known CVEs: pass → fail ▼ security
  • 21 Oct 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed npm/@inkog-io/mcp@1.0.20

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem npm

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

Vulnerabilities 2 findings
ID CVE Severity Vector Fix available
GHSA-g3hv-75wg-m249 CVE-2026-118764 medium yes
GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5 CVE-2023-54404 high CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H yes

Background: What a vulnerability scan can and cannot prove →

Dependencies 96 packages
Packages resolved 96
Stale 30
Tree resolution Complete

Background: SBOMs and build attestations, explained →

MCP tools · 7 exposed · ~921 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
inkog_audit_a2a ~134

Audit Agent-to-Agent (A2A) communications in multi-agent systems. Detects infinite delegation loops, privilege escalation, data leakage between agents, and unauthorized handoffs. Supports Google A2A protocol, CrewAI, LangGraph, and AutoGen. Use this when building or reviewing multi-agent systems to detect delegation vulnerabilities.

NameTypeReqDescription
check_delegation_chainsboolean–Check for infinite delegation loops and unauthorized handoffs
pathstringyesPath to multi-agent system codebase
protocolstring–Multi-agent protocol hint (optional, will auto-detect if not specified)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

inkog_audit_mcp_server ~97

Security audit any MCP server from the registry or GitHub. Analyzes tool permissions, data flow risks, input validation, and potential vulnerabilities. Use this before installing any new MCP server to verify it is safe.

NameTypeReqDescription
repository_urlstring–Direct GitHub repository URL to audit
server_namestring–MCP server name from registry (e.g., "github", "slack", "postgres")

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

inkog_compliance_report ~134

Generate a compliance report for EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, or OWASP LLM Top 10. Analyzes agent code and maps findings to regulatory requirements. Use this when preparing AI agents for regulatory compliance or audit.

NameTypeReqDescription
formatstring–Output format: markdown (default), json, or pdf
frameworkstring–Compliance framework: eu-ai-act (default), nist-ai-rmf, iso-42001, owasp-llm-top-10, or all
pathstringyesPath to scan for compliance analysis

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

inkog_explain_finding ~127

Get detailed explanation and remediation guidance for a security finding or pattern. Includes what the issue is, why it's dangerous, step-by-step fixes, and code examples. Use this after scanning to understand how to fix security findings.

NameTypeReqDescription
finding_idstring–Finding ID from scan results (e.g., "f8a3b2c1")
patternstring–Pattern name: prompt-injection, infinite-loop, sql-injection-llm, token-bombing, hardcoded-credentials, missing-rate-limits, recursive-delegation, etc.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

inkog_generate_mlbom ~113

Generate a Machine Learning Bill of Materials (MLBOM) for AI agents. Lists all models, tools, data sources, frameworks, and dependencies. Supports CycloneDX and SPDX formats. Use this when documenting AI agent dependencies for supply chain compliance.

NameTypeReqDescription
formatstring–Output format: cyclonedx (recommended), spdx, or json
include_vulnerabilitiesboolean–Include known vulnerabilities for detected components
pathstringyesPath to agent codebase to analyze

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

inkog_scan ~217

Security co-pilot for AI agent development. Scans for prompt injection, infinite loops, token bombing, SQL injection via LLM, and missing guardrails. Supports LangChain, CrewAI, LangGraph, AutoGen, n8n, and 20+ agent frameworks. Use this whenever building, reviewing, or deploying AI agents to catch security issues before they reach production.

NameTypeReqDescription
agent_namestring–Agent name for dashboard identification (auto-detected from path if not provided)
filterstring–File filtering: auto (detect agent repos, adapt filtering), agent-only (aggressive filtering), all (no filtering)
outputstring–Output format: summary (default), detailed (full findings), sarif (for CI/CD)
pathstringyesFile or directory path to scan
policystring–Security policy: low-noise (proven vulnerabilities only), balanced (default), comprehensive (all findings), governance (Article 14 focused), eu-ai-act (compliance mode)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

inkog_verify_governance ~99

Validate that AGENTS.md declarations match actual code behavior. Detects governance mismatches like 'read-only declared but code writes data' or 'human approval required but no approval gates in code'. Essential for EU AI Act Article 14 compliance. Use this whenever an AI agent project has an AGENTS.md file, or to verify governance compliance before deployment.

NameTypeReqDescription
pathstringyesPath to directory containing AGENTS.md and agent code

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.inkog-io/inkog MCP server?

io.github.inkog-io/inkog runs locally as an npm package, launched with npx -y @inkog-io/mcp. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

npm · @inkog-io/mcp

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add inkog-io-inkog -- npx -y @inkog-io/mcp
Common questions

What is the io.github.inkog-io/inkog MCP server?

io.github.inkog-io/inkog is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.inkog-io/inkog. Security co-pilot for AI agents. Scan for vulnerabilities, audit MCP servers, verify governance. This page covers its npm package (@inkog-io/mcp).

Is the io.github.inkog-io/inkog MCP server safe to use?

io.github.inkog-io/inkog scores 79 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. We recorded 2 known advisories against it as of 5 November 2026. It declares no install or post-install scripts. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.inkog-io/inkog MCP server expose?

io.github.inkog-io/inkog exposes 7 tools: inkog_scan, inkog_verify_governance, inkog_compliance_report, inkog_explain_finding, inkog_audit_mcp_server, and 2 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 921 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the io.github.inkog-io/inkog MCP server still maintained?

io.github.inkog-io/inkog is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What licence is the io.github.inkog-io/inkog MCP server under?

io.github.inkog-io/inkog declares the Apache-2.0 licence, which is OSI-approved. That covers the source only, and says nothing about the cost of any service it calls.