Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Exec Sandbox

OCI · DOCKER.IO/IDCONSTRUCT/MCP-EXEC:V0.5.4

Single exec tool running caller Python in a network-isolated locked-down sandbox.

0 this week 50 Trust /100

Last scanned (7 hours ago)

Scores higher than 77% of OCI servers

Category Developer Tools

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically from public evidence about the published package, including repeated runs of it in an isolated sandbox, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Supply Chain Security0
  • No malware scan is available for this kind of package: the supply-chain vendors we use do not cover it. This is a permanent gap in our coverage, not a finding about the package.Unverified
  • Known CVEs could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
  • Install-script risk not yet assessed.Unverified
  • Dependency health could not be checked: this artifact ships no SBOM or dependency manifest, so there is no dependency list to read.Unverified
Provenance & Transparency32
Schema Quality & AI Usability72
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 387 tokens (~387/item across 1 items; 1 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety75
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • 0 of 1 tool(s) whose name or description implies an irreversible operation declare an MCP destructiveHint annotation; "exec" implies "exec" and declares no destructiveHint at all, which the MCP spec reads as destructive by default. See how to fix → Fail
  • An AI judge read all 1 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass

Unverified: 1 category

A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: a data source with nothing on this package, evidence we could not reach, or a check we could not run. We only credit what we can confirm.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 1 Nov 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 31 Oct 26 −1
    • Stability: pass → 0.97 functional
  • 17 Oct 26 +3
    • Stability: 0.83 → pass security
  • 16 Oct 26 −3
    • Stability: pass → 0.83 functional
  • 15 Oct 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 13 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 90 to 93. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 27 days of observed history at the previous scan, 28 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 12 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 80 to 90. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 24 days of observed history at the previous scan, 27 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 9 Oct 26 −2

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 93 to 80.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Analysed oci/docker.io/idconstruct/mcp-exec:v0.5.4

Provenance No attestation

The registry publishes no build provenance for this version, so there is nothing to verify.

Result No attestation
Ecosystem oci
Reason No attestation published

Background: How many MCP packages publish verified provenance →

MCP tools · 1 exposed · ~387 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
exec ~387

Execute Python code in a network-isolated sandbox and return its output. Environment: Python 3 with stdlib plus PyYAML and Jinja2. Limits: no network; wall-clock timeout defaults to 30s (max 300s); combined stdout+stderr is capped at 1048576 bytes then truncated; stdin is capped at 1048576 bytes. A non-zero exit_code or timed_out=true is a NORMAL result, not a tool error. INPUT CONTRACT — follow exactly: • `code`: Python source as a single string, newlines as \n. Top-level statements MUST start at column 0 — NO leading spaces/tabs. Indent ONLY bodies of blocks (after a line ending with ':'). Wrong: "import json\n d=json.load(...)" (leading space → IndentationError). Right: "import json\nd=json.load(...)". • `stdin`: a STRING piped to the program's stdin (read it with sys.stdin). To pass JSON, pass it AS a string — do not pass a parsed object/map. • Read input from sys.stdin, print results to stdout. Example: code="import json,sys\nd=json.load(sys.stdin)\nprint(len(d['items']))", stdin="{\"items\":[1,2,3]}" → stdout "3".

NameTypeReqDescription
codestringyesPython source as one string (\n for newlines). Top-level statements MUST start at column 0 (no leading spaces); indent only block bodies after a line ending in ':'. Read sys.stdin, print to stdout.
stdinstring–STRING piped to the program's stdin (max 1 MiB). To pass JSON, pass it as a string — not a parsed object.
timeout_sinteger–wall-clock timeout in seconds (default 30, clamped to [1,300])
NameTypeReqDescription
duration_msintegeryes–
exit_codeintegeryes–
stderrstringyes–
stdoutstringyes–
timed_outbooleanyes–
truncatedbooleanyes–

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Exec Sandbox MCP server?

Exec Sandbox runs locally as a container image, launched with docker run --rm -i -e MCP_EXEC_TRANSPORT -e MCP_EXEC_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_S -e MCP_EXEC_MAX_TIMEOUT_S -e MCP_EXEC_MAX_OUTPUT_BYTES -e MCP_EXEC_MAX_STDIN_BYTES -e MCP_EXEC_AUTH_TOKEN docker.io/idconstruct/mcp-exec:v0.5.4. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 3 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

oci · docker.io/idconstruct/mcp-exec:v0.5.4

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add inhuman-mcp-exec -- docker run --rm -i -e MCP_EXEC_TRANSPORT -e MCP_EXEC_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_S -e MCP_EXEC_MAX_TIMEOUT_S -e MCP_EXEC_MAX_OUTPUT_BYTES -e MCP_EXEC_MAX_STDIN_BYTES -e MCP_EXEC_AUTH_TOKEN docker.io/idconstruct/mcp-exec:v0.5.4

This image reads MCP_EXEC_TRANSPORT, MCP_EXEC_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_S, MCP_EXEC_MAX_TIMEOUT_S, MCP_EXEC_MAX_OUTPUT_BYTES, MCP_EXEC_MAX_STDIN_BYTES and MCP_EXEC_AUTH_TOKEN. Set them in your client's env block for this server; docker run -e passes each one through to the container.

Common questions

What is the Exec Sandbox MCP server?

Exec Sandbox is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.inhuman/mcp-exec. Single exec tool running caller Python in a network-isolated locked-down sandbox. This page covers its container image (docker.io/idconstruct/mcp-exec:v0.5.4).

Is the Exec Sandbox MCP server safe to use?

Exec Sandbox scores 50 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Exec Sandbox MCP server expose?

Exec Sandbox exposes 1 tool: exec. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 387 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Is the Exec Sandbox MCP server still maintained?

Exec Sandbox is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.