Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Zelta Steps to Calories

REMOTE · STEPS-MCP.ZELTA.IN

Calories burned by a step count, and steps needed to walk off a food.

+2 this week 75 Trust /100

Last scanned (5 hours ago)

Scores higher than 64% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category Health and Science

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability41
  • 0% of prompts and resources have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the item's name).Fail
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (good).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 309 tokens (~103/item across 3 items; 2 tools + 1 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 2 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 3 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass
  • Supports UI / widget rendering.Pass
Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 2 Nov 26 +1
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 31 Oct 26 +1
    • Server version: 1.0.0 → 1.0.1 functional
  • 29 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 83 to 87. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 25 days of observed history at the previous scan, 26 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 27 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 77 to 80. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 23 days of observed history at the previous scan, 24 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 25 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 70 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 21 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 23 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 63 to 67. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 19 days of observed history at the previous scan, 20 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 20 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 53 to 57. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 16 days of observed history at the previous scan, 17 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

  • 18 Oct 26 +1

    No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://steps-mcp.zelta.in/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=zelta.in CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 3 Oct 2026 1 Jan 2027 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA256 30b164e8ca896cf80efe3e7051634778
SANs: zelta.in, steps-mcp.zelta.in, *.steps-mcp.zelta.in
CN=WE1,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 7ff31977972c224a76155d13b6d685e3
CN=GTS Root R4,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 15 Nov 2023 28 Jan 2028 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 7fe530bf331343bedd821610493d8a1b

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of steps-mcp.zelta.in. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
in. present 10094 13 Verified
zelta.in. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://steps-mcp.zelta.in/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://steps-mcp.zelta.in/mcp Inconclusive 405
MCP tools · 2 exposed · ~300 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
steps_to_burn ~173

Use this when someone asks how many steps or how long a walk it takes to burn a food or calorie amount, such as "steps to burn a samosa", "how much walking to burn 1 roti" or "steps to burn 300 calories 75 kg". Do not use for running or gym workouts, children, eating-disorder questions, or medical exercise plans.

NameTypeReqDescription
foodstring–A food: roti, samosa, rice, dal or paneer (or give kcal)
height_cmnumber–Optional height in centimetres for stride length
kcalnumber–Calorie amount to walk off, if not using a food
pacestring–Walking pace, default normal
weight_kgnumberyesBody weight in kilograms

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

steps_to_calories ~127

Use this when someone asks how many calories a number of steps burns, such as "10000 steps calories burned 70 kg", "how many calories in 5000 steps" or "calories burned walking 8000 steps brisk". Do not use for running, cycling or gym workouts, children, or medical exercise plans.

NameTypeReqDescription
height_cmnumber–Optional height in centimetres for stride length
pacestring–Walking pace, default normal
stepsintegeryesNumber of steps
weight_kgnumberyesBody weight in kilograms

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the Zelta Steps to Calories MCP server?

Zelta Steps to Calories is a hosted endpoint at https://steps-mcp.zelta.in/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · steps-mcp.zelta.in

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http in-zelta-steps-calories 'https://steps-mcp.zelta.in/mcp'
Common questions

What is the Zelta Steps to Calories MCP server?

Zelta Steps to Calories is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as in.zelta/steps-calories. Calories burned by a step count, and steps needed to walk off a food. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://steps-mcp.zelta.in/mcp).

Is the Zelta Steps to Calories MCP server safe to use?

Zelta Steps to Calories scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Zelta Steps to Calories MCP server expose?

Zelta Steps to Calories exposes 2 tools: steps_to_calories, steps_to_burn. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 300 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Zelta Steps to Calories MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Zelta Steps to Calories without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Zelta Steps to Calories MCP server still maintained?

Zelta Steps to Calories is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.