Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

Enhanciar — company brain

REMOTE · ENHANCIAR.IN · SCANNED SEP 20

Ask your team's code, Slack and docs from any MCP client. Every answer cited to source. Early access

Available components

64 Trust /100
Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security63
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability73
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Context-footprint check failed: tool/resource definitions use about 1743 tokens (~145/item across 12 items; 12 tools + 0 resources), over budget; trim descriptions and params. See how to fix → Fail
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management0
  • Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage71
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 0% of tool parameters carry a description.Fail
  • Structured output schemas are declared (100% of tools); any adoption earns full credit.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 12 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 13 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a supported MCP spec version (2025-11-25); the latest is 2026-07-28.Pass

Unverified: 1 category

A category scored 0 because we could not verify it: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm.

Install

How do I install the Enhanciar — company brain MCP server?

Enhanciar — company brain is a hosted endpoint at https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · enhanciar.in

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http in-enhanciar-enhanciar 'https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/'
// .cursor/mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "in-enhanciar-enhanciar": {
      "url": "https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/"
    }
  }
}
// .vscode/mcp.json
{
  "servers": {
    "in-enhanciar-enhanciar": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/"
    }
  }
}
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.in-enhanciar-enhanciar]
url = "https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/"
// opencode.json
{
  "$schema": "https://opencode.ai/config.json",
  "mcp": {
    "in-enhanciar-enhanciar": {
      "type": "remote",
      "url": "https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/",
      "enabled": true
    }
  }
}
# add to OpenClaw
openclaw mcp add in-enhanciar-enhanciar --url 'https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/' --transport streamable-http
# ~/.hermes/config.yaml
mcp_servers:
  in-enhanciar-enhanciar:
    url: "https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/"
// ~/.netclaw/config/netclaw.json
{
  "McpServers": {
    "in-enhanciar-enhanciar": {
      "Transport": "http",
      "Url": "https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/"
    }
  }
}
# add to Vellum
assistant mcp add in-enhanciar-enhanciar -t streamable-http -u 'https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/'
// mcp.json
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "in-enhanciar-enhanciar": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/"
    }
  }
}

The mcpServers block is a cross-client convention. Remote transports vary, so check your client's docs.

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 20 Sept 26 64

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 20 Sept 2026 · Probed https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=enhanciar.in CN=WR3,O=Google Trust Services,C=US 24 Jul 2026 22 Oct 2026 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA cd2c23faf867e6510a92f1947bc4a16b
SANs: enhanciar.in
CN=WR3,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US 13 Dec 2023 20 Feb 2029 RSA 2048 SHA256-RSA 7ff005a91568d63abc22861684aa4b5a
CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 19 Jun 2020 28 Jan 2028 RSA 4096 SHA256-RSA 77bd0d6cdb36f91aea210fc4f058d30d
CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE (CA) CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE 1 Sept 1998 28 Jan 2028 RSA 2048 SHA1-RSA 40000000001154b5ac394

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of enhanciar.in. Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. trust_anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
in. present 10094 13 Verified
enhanciar.in. absent Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200
Header Value
strict-transport-security max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
content-security-policy default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval' https://www.gstatic.com https://*.firebaseapp.com https://apis.google.com https://accounts.google.com https://checkout.razorpay.com https://*.razorpay.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://www.google.com https://www.googletagmanager.com https://browser.sentry-cdn.com https://*.ingest.sentry.io https://*.ingest.de.sentry.io https://*.ingest.us.sentry.io; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://fonts.googleapis.com; font-src 'self' data: https://fonts.gstatic.com; img-src 'self' data: blob: https://*.googleusercontent.com https://*.gstatic.com; connect-src 'self' https://*.googleapis.com https://*.firebaseio.com https://*.cloudfunctions.net https://*.firebaseapp.com https://identitytoolkit.googleapis.com https://www.google-analytics.com https://*.google-analytics.com https://www.google.com https://*.ingest.sentry.io https://*.ingest.de.sentry.io https://*.ingest.us.sentry.io https://api.razorpay.com https:
x-content-type-options nosniff
x-frame-options DENY
referrer-policy strict-origin-when-cross-origin
permissions-policy accelerometer=(), camera=(), geolocation=(), gyroscope=(), magnetometer=(), microphone=(self), payment=(self), usb=(), interest-cohort=()

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/ Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/ HTTPS enforced 301 https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/
MCP tools · 12 exposed · ~1,649 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_graph ~82

Return the community/knowledge graph manifest for visualisation. Useful when the calling agent wants the high-level structure of the key's workspace (clusters, hub nodes, cross-references) rather than the contents of any one page. Returns ``{nodes, edges, communities, stats}`` — exact shape mirrors the ``/api/wiki/graph`` REST endpoint.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_page ~127

Fetch a single wiki page from the key's workspace. Args: category: One of ``entities | concepts | people | decisions | sources | flows | infrastructure | tickets``. name: Page slug (without ``.md`` extension), as returned by ``list_pages`` / ``search_wiki``. Returns ``{category, name, content}`` — ``content`` is the full markdown body including YAML frontmatter. Returns ``{error: "..."}`` if the page doesn't exist.

NameTypeReqDescription
categorystringyes
namestringyes

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_process_map ~93

Return the "living map of how the company works" for the key's workspace. A graph of process nodes (compiled skills), the external systems they touch (GitHub, Slack, Jira, …), the wiki docs they were derived from, and team groups — with derived_from / uses / references edges. Use this when the agent wants the high-level operational structure rather than one skill's steps.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

get_skill ~89

Fetch one compiled skill by name (slug from ``list_skills``). Returns ``{name, markdown, meta}`` — ``markdown`` is the full agent-executable SKILL.md content (frontmatter + steps), ``meta`` is the parsed frontmatter. Includes an ``error`` key when the skill doesn't exist (with the available names).

NameTypeReqDescription
namestringyes

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

impact ~246

Compute the blast radius of changing ``target`` in the key's workspace. Use this before editing code to see what a change ripples into: direct callers/callees, every affected file, the affected tests, the transitive dependency set, and example dependency paths with per-path facts (hops, dependents at the endpoint, whether it lands in a test). There is deliberately no risk score. There was one — thresholds on the transitive count — and it was a verdict the caller could not check or argue with. The counts it was computed from are all here; judge from those. Args: target: A graph node id, wiki page name, file path (``micrograd/engine.py``), or a function fqn (``engine.py::func``). depth: How many hops to traverse the call graph (default 2). Returns the impact dict — ``{target, label, found, direct_callers, direct_callees, affected_files, affected_tests, transitive_nodes, transitive_count, paths, path_facts}``.

NameTypeReqDescription
depthinteger
targetstringyes

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

list_pages ~79

List every wiki page the caller can see in the key's workspace. Returns a list of ``{category, name, title}`` records — feed each one to ``get_page`` to fetch the full markdown body. Use this first when you want a directory view; for a specific question prefer ``query`` which handles retrieval for you.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
resultarrayyes

No examples provided.

list_proposed_actions ~108

List the key's workspace's proposed actions (the approval queue). Read-only. Optionally filter by ``status`` (proposed / approved / executing / done / failed / dismissed). Returns ``{id, action_type, status, source, title, source_doc_id, external_id}`` per proposal. NOTE: MCP can read and PROPOSE actions but deliberately cannot approve or execute them — a human approves every action in the app UI.

NameTypeReqDescription
statusstring
NameTypeReqDescription
resultarrayyes

No examples provided.

list_repos ~220

List the repos ingested into the key's workspace. Returns ``{full_name, branch, last_ingested_at}`` records. Use this when the agent needs to know what context is available before asking a question. Reads what ingest actually recorded for this namespace: ``repos.json`` (the repo→clone map every other read path resolves through) plus the per-repo ``_state`` files that carry the branch and the last run's timestamp. It used to read a Firestore subcollection ``users/{uid}/repos``, which was wrong twice over. It was keyed by the person rather than the workspace — the bug this module was fixed for — and nothing in the codebase has ever written to that path, so the tool returned an empty list to everyone, forever. Hence ``branch`` rather than the old ``default_branch``: the state file records the branch that was actually ingested, and no caller can be depending on a key that never had a row under it.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
resultarrayyes

No examples provided.

list_skills ~104

List the compiled skills (recurring procedures) in the key's workspace. Skills are agent-executable SKILL.md pages mined from that workspace's wiki by the skills compiler. Returns ``{name, title, description, confidence, last_compiled, sources}`` records — feed a ``name`` to ``get_skill`` for the full markdown. Empty list = nothing compiled yet (the user can run a compile from Enhanciar's UI or API).

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

NameTypeReqDescription
resultarrayyes

No examples provided.

propose_action ~134

Propose a new action for human approval (does NOT execute it). ``action_type`` is a registered executor id (e.g. ``jira.create_issue``, ``linear.create_issue``, ``github.create_issue``). The proposal lands in the key's workspace's approval queue where a person picks the target and approves it — approve/execute are intentionally NOT exposed over MCP. Returns the created ``{id, action_type, status}`` or an ``error``.

NameTypeReqDescription
action_typestringyes
descriptionstring
evidencestring
titlestringyes

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

query ~261

Ask Enhanciar a natural-language question grounded in the key's workspace. This is the high-level tool — use it for any "what does X do", "why did we choose Y", "where is Z handled" question. It runs the full retrieval + synthesis pipeline and returns the answer plus citations. Args: question: Natural-language question. model: Optional model id override (``gemini-2.5-flash``, ``gpt-4o``, ``claude-sonnet-4-5``, etc.). If omitted the saved default is used — the workspace's in a team workspace, the caller's own in a personal one. Returns ``{answer, sources, model}`` — ``sources`` is a list of ``{category, name, url}`` citations the LLM grounded its answer in. Surface them to the human so they can verify. When the workspace has nothing ingested at all you get ``{answer, empty_brain: true}`` and no sources: that is a statement about the workspace, not a failed search, so rephrasing the question will not change it.

NameTypeReqDescription
model
questionstringyes

Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.

No examples provided.

search_wiki ~106

Substring search across the wiki pages in the key's workspace. Cheap and deterministic — no embedding required. Returns up to ``limit`` (default 20, max 50) ``{category, name, title, snippet}`` hits. The ``snippet`` is a short window around the first match, safe to surface in chat as a citation preview. For semantic / natural-language questions prefer ``query``.

NameTypeReqDescription
limitinteger
querystringyes
NameTypeReqDescription
resultarrayyes

No examples provided.

Common questions

What is the Enhanciar — company brain MCP server?

Enhanciar — company brain is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as in.enhanciar/enhanciar. Ask your team's code, Slack and docs from any MCP client. Every answer cited to source. Early access. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/).

Is the Enhanciar — company brain MCP server safe to use?

Enhanciar — company brain scores 64 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the Enhanciar — company brain MCP server expose?

Enhanciar — company brain exposes 12 tools: list_pages, search_wiki, get_page, query, impact, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,649 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the Enhanciar — company brain MCP server require authentication?

No. We connected to Enhanciar — company brain without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the Enhanciar — company brain MCP server still maintained?

Enhanciar — company brain is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 20 September 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.