Enhanciar — company brain
REMOTE · ENHANCIAR.IN
Ask your company's Slack, Gmail, Drive, Notion, Jira and code from any MCP client, with sources.
Available components
Last scanned (6 hours ago)
Scores higher than 19% of remote servers
Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.
Category Code Search and Documentation
How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →
Endpoint Security89
- The endpoint's TLS certificate is valid, in date, and uses a strong key. View diagnostics → Pass
- The endpoint enforces authorisation, but returns a challenge with no valid RFC 9728 metadata, so a client cannot discover where to get a token. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
- HTTPS is enforced; there's no plaintext access path. View diagnostics → Pass
- The HSTS (Strict-Transport-Security) header is present. View diagnostics → Pass
- DNSSEC check failed: this domain isn't protected by DNSSEC. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Fail
Transport & Reachability0
- Transport blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to verify streamable-http. See how to fix → View diagnostics → Unverified
Schema Quality & AI Usability0
- Schema blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read it. See how to fix → Unverified
Stability & Change Management0
- Stability not yet verified: not enough scan history yet (needs a 30-day window).Unverified
Tool Coverage0
- Tool coverage blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read its tools.Unverified
Tool Safety0
- Tool safety blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read its tools.Unverified
Capabilities0
- Capabilities blocked by authentication: the endpoint requires auth we don't have to read them. See how to fix → Unverified
Unverified: 6 categories
Categories scored 0 because we could not verify them: authentication we do not have, an unreachable endpoint, or not enough scan history. We only credit what we can confirm. Claim this server and supply a read-only token to verify it and lift the score.
Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.
- 15 Oct 26 −39
- Endpoint reachability: reachable → behind authorisation ▼ security
- Authorization: unverified → fail ▼ security
- Stability: 0.80 → unverified ▼ security
- Tool safety: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Transport: pass → unverified ▼ security
- Capabilities: pass → unverified ▼ functional
- Tool coverage: 100 → unverified ▼ functional
- First check of Schema quality: unverified functional
- 13 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 73 to 77. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 22 days of observed history at the previous scan, 23 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 12 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 67 to 73. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 20 days of observed history at the previous scan, 22 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 9 Oct 26 +2
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 50 to 63. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 15 days of observed history at the previous scan, 19 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 5 Oct 26 +1
No change was recorded against any check on this day. Stability & Change Management went from 47 to 50. That category is still filling its 30-day observation window: 14 days of observed history at the previous scan, 15 at this one. The score rises as the window fills, whether or not the server changes.
- 1 Oct 26 0
- “get_page” added an optional parameter “page” cosmetic
- “get_page” added an optional parameter “path” cosmetic
- “get_page” added an optional parameter “slug” cosmetic
- “get_page” added an optional parameter “title” cosmetic
- “get_page” made “category” optional cosmetic
- “get_page” made “name” optional cosmetic
6 cosmetic changes on this day. Switch on “Show cosmetic changes” to see them.
- 28 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
- 25 Sept 26 0
- We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.
Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/
TLS valid
Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .
| Subject | Issuer | Valid from | Valid until | Key | Signature | Serial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN=enhanciar.in | CN=WR3,O=Google Trust Services,C=US | 21 Sept 2026 | 20 Dec 2026 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | eeed69c164d6543412421407c2a21ef7 |
| SANs: enhanciar.in, www.enhanciar.in | ||||||
| CN=WR3,O=Google Trust Services,C=US (CA) | CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US | 13 Dec 2023 | 20 Feb 2029 | RSA 2048 | SHA256-RSA | 7ff005a91568d63abc22861684aa4b5a |
| CN=GTS Root R1,O=Google Trust Services LLC,C=US (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 19 Jun 2020 | 28 Jan 2028 | RSA 4096 | SHA256-RSA | 77bd0d6cdb36f91aea210fc4f058d30d |
| CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE (CA) | CN=GlobalSign Root CA,OU=Root CA,O=GlobalSign nv-sa,C=BE | 1 Sept 1998 | 28 Jan 2028 | RSA 2048 | SHA1-RSA | 40000000001154b5ac394 |
Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →
DNSSEC insecure
Validation of enhanciar.in. — Not signed
| Zone | DS | Keys | Algorithms | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| . | trust_anchor | 20326, 38696 | 8, 8 | Verified |
| in. | present | 10094 | 13 | Verified |
| enhanciar.in. | absent | Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation |
Authentication Challenged, unverified
The endpoint asked for a token, but we could not retrieve and validate the RFC 9728 metadata that tells a client how to obtain one.
| Result | Challenged, unverified |
|---|---|
| Enforced | On connection |
| HTTP status | 401 |
WWW-Authenticate challenge Bearer realm="enhanciar"
Bearer realm="enhanciar" | Header | Value |
|---|---|
| strict-transport-security | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| x-content-type-options | nosniff |
| x-frame-options | DENY |
| referrer-policy | strict-origin-when-cross-origin |
| permissions-policy | accelerometer=(), camera=(), geolocation=(), gyroscope=(), magnetometer=(), microphone=(self), payment=(self), usb=(), interest-cohort=() |
| www-authenticate | Bearer realm="enhanciar" |
Protected resource metadata
| Retrieved | No |
|---|---|
| Problem | no_resource_metadata |
Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →
Transports 2 probes
| Transport | URL | Outcome | Status | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| streamable-http | https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/ | Auth required | 401 | |
| http (plaintext) | http://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/ | HTTPS enforced | 301 | https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/ |
The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →
get_graph ~82
Return the community/knowledge graph manifest for visualisation. Useful when the calling agent wants the high-level structure of the key's workspace (clusters, hub nodes, cross-references) rather than the contents of any one page. Returns ``{nodes, edges, communities, stats}`` — exact shape mirrors the ``/api/wiki/graph`` REST endpoint.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_page ~143
Fetch a single wiki page from the key's workspace. Args: category: One of ``entities | concepts | people | decisions | sources | flows | infrastructure | tickets``. name: Page slug (without ``.md`` extension), as returned by ``list_pages`` / ``search_wiki``. Returns ``{category, name, content}`` — ``content`` is the full markdown body including YAML frontmatter. Returns ``{error: "..."}`` if the page doesn't exist.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| category | – | – | – |
| name | – | – | – |
| page | – | – | – |
| path | – | – | – |
| slug | – | – | – |
| title | – | – | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_process_map ~93
Return the "living map of how the company works" for the key's workspace. A graph of process nodes (compiled skills), the external systems they touch (GitHub, Slack, Jira, …), the wiki docs they were derived from, and team groups — with derived_from / uses / references edges. Use this when the agent wants the high-level operational structure rather than one skill's steps.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
get_skill ~89
Fetch one compiled skill by name (slug from ``list_skills``). Returns ``{name, markdown, meta}`` — ``markdown`` is the full agent-executable SKILL.md content (frontmatter + steps), ``meta`` is the parsed frontmatter. Includes an ``error`` key when the skill doesn't exist (with the available names).
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
impact ~246
Compute the blast radius of changing ``target`` in the key's workspace. Use this before editing code to see what a change ripples into: direct callers/callees, every affected file, the affected tests, the transitive dependency set, and example dependency paths with per-path facts (hops, dependents at the endpoint, whether it lands in a test). There is deliberately no risk score. There was one — thresholds on the transitive count — and it was a verdict the caller could not check or argue with. The counts it was computed from are all here; judge from those. Args: target: A graph node id, wiki page name, file path (``micrograd/engine.py``), or a function fqn (``engine.py::func``). depth: How many hops to traverse the call graph (default 2). Returns the impact dict — ``{target, label, found, direct_callers, direct_callees, affected_files, affected_tests, transitive_nodes, transitive_count, paths, path_facts}``.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| depth | integer | – | – |
| target | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
list_pages ~79
List every wiki page the caller can see in the key's workspace. Returns a list of ``{category, name, title}`` records — feed each one to ``get_page`` to fetch the full markdown body. Use this first when you want a directory view; for a specific question prefer ``query`` which handles retrieval for you.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
list_proposed_actions ~108
List the key's workspace's proposed actions (the approval queue). Read-only. Optionally filter by ``status`` (proposed / approved / executing / done / failed / dismissed). Returns ``{id, action_type, status, source, title, source_doc_id, external_id}`` per proposal. NOTE: MCP can read and PROPOSE actions but deliberately cannot approve or execute them — a human approves every action in the app UI.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| status | string | – | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
list_repos ~220
List the repos ingested into the key's workspace. Returns ``{full_name, branch, last_ingested_at}`` records. Use this when the agent needs to know what context is available before asking a question. Reads what ingest actually recorded for this namespace: ``repos.json`` (the repo→clone map every other read path resolves through) plus the per-repo ``_state`` files that carry the branch and the last run's timestamp. It used to read a Firestore subcollection ``users/{uid}/repos``, which was wrong twice over. It was keyed by the person rather than the workspace — the bug this module was fixed for — and nothing in the codebase has ever written to that path, so the tool returned an empty list to everyone, forever. Hence ``branch`` rather than the old ``default_branch``: the state file records the branch that was actually ingested, and no caller can be depending on a key that never had a row under it.
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
list_skills ~104
List the compiled skills (recurring procedures) in the key's workspace. Skills are agent-executable SKILL.md pages mined from that workspace's wiki by the skills compiler. Returns ``{name, title, description, confidence, last_compiled, sources}`` records — feed a ``name`` to ``get_skill`` for the full markdown. Empty list = nothing compiled yet (the user can run a compile from Enhanciar's UI or API).
Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
propose_action ~134
Propose a new action for human approval (does NOT execute it). ``action_type`` is a registered executor id (e.g. ``jira.create_issue``, ``linear.create_issue``, ``github.create_issue``). The proposal lands in the key's workspace's approval queue where a person picks the target and approves it — approve/execute are intentionally NOT exposed over MCP. Returns the created ``{id, action_type, status}`` or an ``error``.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| action_type | string | yes | – |
| description | string | – | – |
| evidence | string | – | – |
| title | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
query ~261
Ask Enhanciar a natural-language question grounded in the key's workspace. This is the high-level tool — use it for any "what does X do", "why did we choose Y", "where is Z handled" question. It runs the full retrieval + synthesis pipeline and returns the answer plus citations. Args: question: Natural-language question. model: Optional model id override (``gemini-2.5-flash``, ``gpt-4o``, ``claude-sonnet-4-5``, etc.). If omitted the saved default is used — the workspace's in a team workspace, the caller's own in a personal one. Returns ``{answer, sources, model}`` — ``sources`` is a list of ``{category, name, url}`` citations the LLM grounded its answer in. Surface them to the human so they can verify. When the workspace has nothing ingested at all you get ``{answer, empty_brain: true}`` and no sources: that is a statement about the workspace, not a failed search, so rephrasing the question will not change it.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| model | – | – | – |
| question | string | yes | – |
Structured output declared, but exposes no named fields.
No examples provided.
search_wiki ~106
Substring search across the wiki pages in the key's workspace. Cheap and deterministic — no embedding required. Returns up to ``limit`` (default 20, max 50) ``{category, name, title, snippet}`` hits. The ``snippet`` is a short window around the first match, safe to surface in chat as a citation preview. For semantic / natural-language questions prefer ``query``.
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | integer | – | – |
| query | string | yes | – |
| Name | Type | Req | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | array | yes | – |
No examples provided.
How do I install the Enhanciar — company brain MCP server?
Enhanciar — company brain is a hosted endpoint at https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.
remote · enhanciar.in
claude mcp add --transport http in-enhanciar-enhanciar 'https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/'
What is the Enhanciar — company brain MCP server?
Enhanciar — company brain is an MCP server listed in the public MCP registry as in.enhanciar/enhanciar. Ask your company's Slack, Gmail, Drive, Notion, Jira and code from any MCP client, with sources. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://enhanciar.in/enhanciar/mcp/).
Is the Enhanciar — company brain MCP server safe to use?
Enhanciar — company brain scores 36 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.
What tools does the Enhanciar — company brain MCP server expose?
Enhanciar — company brain exposes 12 tools: list_pages, search_wiki, get_page, query, impact, and 7 more. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 1,665 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.
Does the Enhanciar — company brain MCP server require authentication?
Yes. Enhanciar — company brain asked us for credentials when we connected, so you will need to authorise it in your MCP client before it can do anything.
Is the Enhanciar — company brain MCP server still maintained?
Enhanciar — company brain is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.