Skip to content
verify mcp Beta VerifyMCP is currently in beta. If you notice any issues, get in touch and we’ll put it right.

io.github.imgproc-git/govbid-mcp-server

REMOTE · GOVBID-MCP-SERVER.GAIKOTSUIMAGEPROCESSING.WORKERS.DEV

U.S. federal contract opportunities from SAM.gov. Daily updates. Public Domain.

0 this week 75 Trust /100

Last scanned (9 hours ago)

Scores higher than 64% of remote servers

Reachable. Last reached 5 Nov 2026.

Category CRM and Sales

Trust breakdown (7 categories)

How this component scores in each security and reliability category. Every signal is checked automatically against the live server, and we only credit what we can confirm. How we score → Why this is hard to score →

Endpoint Security46
Transport & Reachability100
Schema Quality & AI Usability83
  • AI-judged instruction clarity (excellent).Pass
  • Tool/resource definitions use about 415 tokens (~103/item across 4 items; 4 tools + 0 resources), lean.Pass
  • Usage-examples check failed: none of the tools include examples. See how to fix → Fail
Stability & Change Management100
  • No destabilizing schema changes in the last 30 days.Pass
Tool Coverage100
  • 100% of tools have a non-trivial description (not blank, and not just the tool's name).Pass
  • 100% of tool parameters carry a description.Pass
Tool Safety100
  • No prompt-injection markers were found in the server instructions, tool names or descriptions we captured.Pass
  • We read all 4 captured tool definition(s), and no name or description among them implies an irreversible operation.Pass
  • An AI judge read all 4 captured unit(s) of tool text and found none that tries to manipulate the model reading it.Pass
Capabilities100
  • Implements a current MCP spec version (2026-07-28).Pass
What we tested

Checks we ran (11)

  • TLS certificate
  • HSTS header
  • DNSSEC
  • Transport
  • Schema quality
  • Stability
  • Tool coverage
  • Injection markers
  • Destructive annotations
  • Judged manipulation
  • MCP protocol

Checks we could not complete (2)

These are gaps on our side, not findings about this hosted endpoint. We only credit what we can confirm, so a category made up entirely of them scores 0.

  • Authorization in Endpoint SecurityAuthorisation not fully verified: no authorisation is required to call this server, and 4 tool(s) never declared a destructiveHint. The MCP spec treats an absent hint as destructive by default, so we cannot call this surface safe.
  • HTTPS in Endpoint SecurityHTTPS enforcement could not be verified: the plaintext port answered with HTTP 405, which proves neither a plaintext path nor enforcement.

Does not apply to this hosted endpoint (2)

  • Supply Chain SecurityScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.
  • Provenance & TransparencyScored on package channels only. This is a hosted endpoint, so there is nothing to install or inspect.

The score does not measure everything. What the score does not measure →

Changelog

Every change we have recorded for this component, newest first. Security-relevant changes are always shown. ▲ marks a change for the better, ▼ a change for the worse; unmarked changes are neutral.

  • 28 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 25 Sept 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 22 Sept 26 0
    • Stability: 0.97 → pass security
  • 31 Aug 26 0
    • Tool “search_opportunities” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: 87 → 103 ▼ functional
    • Server version: 1.0.0 → 1.1.0 functional
    • New tool “register_agent” functional
    • “search_opportunities” reworded the description of “api_key” cosmetic
  • 30 Aug 26 0
    • Tool “get_api_info” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “get_opportunity_detail” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Tool “search_opportunities” rewrote its description, which is the text the model reads security
    • Schema quality: 34 → 87 ▼ functional
    • Tool coverage: 0% → 100% ▲ functional
    • Schema quality: good → excellent functional
    • “get_opportunity_detail” reworded the description of “notice_id” cosmetic
    • “search_opportunities” reworded the description of “api_key” cosmetic
    • “search_opportunities” reworded the description of “days” cosmetic
    • “search_opportunities” reworded the description of “department” cosmetic
    • “search_opportunities” reworded the description of “limit” cosmetic
  • 26 Aug 26 0
    • We updated how we score, so this day's move reflects our rubric, not a change to the server See what changed → functional
  • 24 Aug 26 0
    • Stability: unverified → 0.03 ▲ functional
  • 23 Aug 26 0

    First indexed and scored.

Diagnostics

Diagnostic detail from the automated scan of this channel: what the scanner observed at each step, so you can see exactly where a check passed or failed. It is informational only and never changes the trust score.

Captured 5 Nov 2026 · Probed https://govbid-mcp-server.gaikotsuimageprocessing.workers.dev/mcp

TLS valid

Negotiated TLS 1.3 with TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 .

Subject Issuer Valid from Valid until Key Signature Serial
CN=gaikotsuimageprocessing.workers.dev CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US 11 Sept 2026 10 Dec 2026 ECDSA 256 ECDSA-SHA384 5f8d9faf783d5bfab3acd1b739fc7f2a54a
SANs: *.gaikotsuimageprocessing.workers.dev, gaikotsuimageprocessing.workers.dev
CN=YE1,O=Let's Encrypt,C=US (CA) CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US 3 Sept 2025 2 Sept 2028 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 5ddd70dd31f801c85c186a7a04b80afe
CN=Root YE,O=ISRG,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 ECDSA-SHA384 872165fc34b6e5fba8add5b3705fb53a
CN=ISRG Root X2,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US (CA) CN=ISRG Root X1,O=Internet Security Research Group,C=US 13 May 2026 2 Sept 2032 ECDSA 384 SHA256-RSA 6c8f1dc727c7117f7baf853ac980f9cd

Background: What to check on a remote MCP endpoint →

DNSSEC insecure

Validation of govbid-mcp-server.gaikotsuimageprocessing.workers.dev. — Not signed

Zone DS Keys Algorithms Outcome
. Trust anchor 20326, 38696 8, 8 Verified
dev. DS published 60074 8 Verified
workers.dev. No DS Unsigned (proven) parent-signed NSEC/NSEC3 proves an unsigned delegation
Authentication No authorisation required

The endpoint answered without asking for a token. Anyone who knows the URL can reach it.

Result No authorisation required
HTTP status 200

Background: How OAuth 2.1 works in the 2026 MCP spec →

Transports 2 probes
Transport URL Outcome Status Location
streamable-http https://govbid-mcp-server.gaikotsuimageprocessing.workers.dev/mcp Verified 200
http (plaintext) http://govbid-mcp-server.gaikotsuimageprocessing.workers.dev/mcp Inconclusive 405
MCP tools · 4 exposed · ~415 tokens

The tools this component advertises to a client, with an estimated token cost for each. Expand a tool to see its parameters and schema. The per-tool counts are indicative and are not scored directly; the schema's total context footprint is one signal in Schema Quality & AI Usability. A tool's description is untrusted text the model reads on every call, which is what makes this list a security surface and not just an inventory: how tool poisoning works →

Tool Tokens
get_api_info ~43

Get metadata about the GovBid Global API including version, data source, license information, and usage guidelines. Call this first to understand the service before making other tool calls.

Input schema present but exposes no named parameters.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

get_opportunity_detail ~69

Get the direct SAM.gov URL for a specific contract opportunity by its notice ID. Use this to provide users with a link to verify and view full details on SAM.gov.

NameTypeReqDescription
notice_idstringyesThe unique notice ID of the opportunity (from the 'id' field in search results)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

register_agent ~126

Register this agent with the GovBid Global API and receive an API key. Call this once if you don't already have an api_key, before calling search_opportunities. No human interaction (e.g. CAPTCHA) is required — this endpoint is designed for autonomous AI agent self-registration. The returned api_key is shown only once, so store it for reuse.

NameTypeReqDescription
agent_namestringyesA name identifying this agent or application (e.g. 'research-assistant-v2')
emailstringyesA contact email associated with this registration. One active key is allowed per email.

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

search_opportunities ~177

Search U.S. federal government contract opportunities from SAM.gov. Returns recent procurement notices with title, department, deadline, and source URL. Data is updated daily. License: Public Domain (SAM.gov). Requires an api_key — call register_agent first if you don't have one.

NameTypeReqDescription
api_keystringyesGovBid API key (X-API-Key). Required for authentication. If you don't have one, call register_agent first.
daysnumber–How many days back to search (1-365, default: 7)
departmentstring–Filter by agency/department name (partial match). Examples: 'DEFENSE', 'NAVY', 'ARMY', 'INTERIOR', 'HEALTH'
limitnumber–Number of opportunities to return (1-100, default: 10)

No output schema declared.

No examples provided.

Install

How do I install the io.github.imgproc-git/govbid-mcp-server server?

io.github.imgproc-git/govbid-mcp-server is a hosted endpoint at https://govbid-mcp-server.gaikotsuimageprocessing.workers.dev/mcp, so there is nothing to install locally. Ready-made configuration for Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Codex and 5 more is on this page, copied from each client's own documentation.

remote · govbid-mcp-server.gaikotsuimageprocessing.workers.dev

# add to Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http imgproc-git-govbid-mcp-server 'https://govbid-mcp-server.gaikotsuimageprocessing.workers.dev/mcp'
Common questions

What is the io.github.imgproc-git/govbid-mcp-server server?

io.github.imgproc-git/govbid-mcp-server is listed in the public MCP registry as io.github.imgproc-git/govbid-mcp-server. U.S. federal contract opportunities from SAM.gov. Daily updates. Public Domain. This page covers its hosted endpoint (https://govbid-mcp-server.gaikotsuimageprocessing.workers.dev/mcp).

Is the io.github.imgproc-git/govbid-mcp-server server safe to use?

io.github.imgproc-git/govbid-mcp-server scores 75 out of 100 on VerifyMCP. That is a record of what we were able to check automatically, not an endorsement. The category breakdown on this page shows every signal behind the number, including the ones we could not confirm.

What tools does the io.github.imgproc-git/govbid-mcp-server server expose?

io.github.imgproc-git/govbid-mcp-server exposes 4 tools: register_agent, search_opportunities, get_opportunity_detail, get_api_info. Their descriptions and schemas cost roughly 415 tokens of context every time the server is loaded.

Does the io.github.imgproc-git/govbid-mcp-server server require authentication?

No. We connected to io.github.imgproc-git/govbid-mcp-server without credentials and it answered, so anything it exposes is reachable by anyone who knows the address.

Is the io.github.imgproc-git/govbid-mcp-server server still maintained?

io.github.imgproc-git/govbid-mcp-server is still listed as active in the MCP registry. We last reached this channel on 5 November 2026. Those dates come from our own scans of the registry and the channel itself, not from anything the publisher announced.

What did VerifyMCP test on the io.github.imgproc-git/govbid-mcp-server server?

VerifyMCP ran 11 checks on io.github.imgproc-git/govbid-mcp-server, covering TLS certificate, HSTS header, DNSSEC, Transport and 7 more. 2 items could not be completed, a gap on our side rather than a finding about io.github.imgproc-git/govbid-mcp-server: Authorization and HTTPS. Supply Chain Security and Provenance & Transparency do not apply to a hosted endpoint, so they were not tested. The score does not measure everything, and the scoring documentation lists what it leaves out.